In view of the pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2, there is increasing evidence that face masks should be worn in public spaces as an integral part of hygiene measures to contain the virus (1). Currently, the most common face masks are FFP2 masks...

Purpose of Review: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) represents a well-established and effective non-pharmaceutical heart failure (HF) treatment in selected patients. Still, a significant number of patients remain CRT non-responders. An optimal placement of the left ventricular (LV) lead appears crucial for the intended hemodynamic and hence clinical improvement. A well-localized target area and tools that help to achieve successful lead implantation seem to be of utmost importance to reach an optimal CRT effect. Recent Findings: Recent studies suggest previous multimodal imaging (CT/cMRI/ECG torso) to guide intraprocedural LV lead placement. Relevant benefit compared to empirical lead optimization is still a matter of debate. Technical improvements in leads and algorithms (e.g., multipoint pacing (MPP), adaptive algorithms) promise higher procedural success. Recently emerging alternatives for ventricular synchronization such as conduction system pacing (CSP), LV endocardial pacing, or leadless pacing challenge classical biventricular pacing. Summary: This article reviews current strategies for a successful planning, implementation, and validation of the optimal CRT implantation. Pre-implant imaging modalities offer promising assistance for complex cases; empirical lead positioning and intraoperative testing remain the cornerstone in most cases and ensure a successful CRT effect.

Introduction: Left atrial (LA) low voltage areas (LVA) are a controversial target in atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. However, LVA and LA volume are good predictors of arrhythmia recurrence in ablation‐naïve patients. Their predictive value in progressively diseased pre‐ablated atria is uncertain.Methods: Consecutive patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT), who were scheduled for repeat LA ablation, were enrolled in the prospective Bernau ablation registry between 2016 and 2020. All patients received a complete LA ultrahigh‐density map before ablation. Maps were analyzed for LA size, LVA percentage and distribution. The predictive value of demographic, anatomic, and mapping variables on AF recurrence was analyzed.Results: 160 patients (50.6% male, 1.3 pre‐ablations, 60% persistent AF) with complete LA voltage maps were included. Mean follow‐up time was 16 ± 11 months. Mean recorded electrograms (EGMs) per map were 9754 ± 5808, mean LA volume was 176.1 ± 35.9 ml and mean rate of LVAs 30 s was 55.6%. Patients with recurrence had a significant higher percentage of LVAs (40.0% vs. 18.8%, p < .001) but no relevant difference in LA volume (172 vs. 178 mL, p = .299). ROC curves revealed LVA as a good predictor for recurrence (AUC = 0.79, p < .001) and a cut‐off of 22% LVAs with highest sensitivity (73.0%) and specificity (71.8%). Based on this cut off, event free survival was significantly higher in the Low LVA group (p < .01).Conclusion: Total LVA percentage has a good predictive power on arrhythmia recurrence in a cohort of advanced scarred left atria in repeat procedures independent of the applied ablation strategy. Left atrial volume seems to have minor impact on the rhythm outcome in our study cohort.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmia recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is common. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to determine the impact of increased physical activity on atrial fibrillation recurrence after PVI. METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, we randomly assigned 200 patients with atrial fibrillation to the ACTION or NO-ACTION group in 4 different centers in the local country of Brandenburg, Germany. Patients were eligible if they were scheduled to undergo PVI, aged ≥50 to ≤77 years, body mass index ≥23 to ≤35 kg/m ² , and accepted wearing an activity tracker allowing 24-hour activity monitoring via mobile app. Patients in the ACTION group were actively remote-controlled via transmitted activity data by a physiotherapist, and individual motivational interviewing call sessions were scheduled with each ACTION patient every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the composite of recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia >30 seconds, additional ablation procedure, cardioversion, and new onset of antiarrhythmic drugs earliest after 90 days after index PVI over 12 months. RESULTS: Overall, the median age of patients was 66 (interquartile range, 61–71) years, 33.5% were women, and 52% had persistent atrial fibrillation. The number of steps per day increased in both groups of patients from baseline to 12 months ( P <0.001). The absolute increase in steps per day did not differ between patients in the ACTION group with +3205 steps (597–4944) compared with those in the NO-ACTION group +2423 steps (17–4284), P =0.325. Unadjusted intention-to-treat analysis showed no difference in the primary composite end point in the ACTION group (27.3%) versus the NO-ACTION group (32.7%), P =0.405. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity improved in patients after PVI. The present randomized controlled trial shows that activity tracker and motivational calls to increase physical activity versus activity tracker alone did not reduce the occurrence of the primary composite end point of atrial fibrillation recurrence or the absolute increase in steps per day. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.cochranelibrary.com ; Unique identifier: DRKS00012914.

This study aimed to investigate the incidence and potentially modifiable risk factors of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) admitted for removal of infected and non-infected transvenous leads. In this observational cohort study, data from 147 consecutive patients with CIED undergoing transvenous lead removal were analyzed. Study endpoint was AKI according to the KDIGO criteria. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for AKI. Lead removal was performed due to systemic infection (50.3%), isolated pocket infection (34.0%), pocket or lead perforation without infection (13.6%), and endocarditis (2.0%). Out of 147 patients, 34 (23.1%) developed AKI (82.4% stage 1, 8.8% stage 2, and 8.8% stage 3). There was no difference regarding incidence of AKI when separated by infectious vs. non-infectious lead status (25.5 vs. 25.0%) p = 0.605. Defibrillator lead type (HR 24.55, CI 2.41 - 249.97, p = 0.007), necessity to perform laser-assisted lead removal (HR 5.41, CI 1.12 - 26.13, p = 0.035), and time from initial implantation to lead removal (HR 1.01, CI 1.00 - 1.02, p = 0.013) were independent risk factors for AKI. Also, AKI was associated with in-hospital mortality (HR 8.44, CI 2.08 - 34.33, p = 0.003). Almost a quarter of patients undergoing transvenous lead removal developed AKI. Independent modifiable risk factors for AKI were identified. The role of procedure-related risk factors for AKI, such as lead type and use of laser, needs further evaluation in these patients.

With a growing number of ICD recipients, device complications are seen more frequently in the clinical setting and outpatient departments. Among the most severe are ICD infections and inappropriate therapies caused by oversensing of atrial tachycardias or lead fracture. We report on a 76-year-old female patient with dilative cardiomyopathy and Broca’s aphasia after stroke, who experienced 105 consecutive inappropriate ICD shocks due to cluster missensing of her fractured ICD lead. The diagnosis was complicated and delayed by patient’s aphasia emphasizing the need for intensified remote monitoring along with regular in-person visits, especially in people with intellectual or communication disabilities.