Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a noteworthy contributor to both morbidity and mortality in the context of patients who undergo colorectal surgery. Several risk factors have been identified; however, their relative significance remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies from their inception up until 2023 that investigated risk factors for SSIs in colorectal surgery. A random-effects model was used to pool the data and calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each risk factor. Results: Our analysis included 26 studies with a total of 61,426 patients. The pooled results showed that male sex (OR = 1.45), body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 (OR = 1.09), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3 (OR = 1.69), were all independent risk factors for SSIs in colorectal surgery. Conversely, laparoscopic surgery (OR = 0.70) was found to be a protective factor. Conclusions: The meta-analysis conducted revealed various risk factors, both modifiable and non-modifiable, associated with surgical site infections (SSIs) in colorectal surgery. These findings emphasize the significance of targeted interventions, including optimizing glycemic control, minimizing blood loss, and using laparoscopic techniques whenever feasible in order to decrease the occurrence of surgical site infections in this particular group of patients.
Cystic echinococcosis is a zoonotic parasitic disease that affects the liver in more than 70% of cases, and there is still an underestimated incidence in endemic areas. With a peculiar clinical presentation that ranges from paucisymptomatic illness to severe and possibly fatal complications, quality imaging and serological studies are required for diagnosis. The mainstay of treatment to date is surgery combined with antiparasitic agents. The surgical armamentarium consists of open and laparoscopic procedures for selected cases with growing confidence in parenchyma-sparing interventions. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is extremely useful for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary fistulas. Recent relevant studies in the literature are reviewed, and two complex cases are presented. The first patient underwent open surgery to treat 11 liver cysts, and during the follow-up, a right pulmonary cyst was diagnosed that was treated by minimally invasive surgery. The second case is represented by the peritoneal rupture of a giant liver cyst in a young woman who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Both patients developed biliary fistulas that were managed by ERCP. Both patients exhibited a non-specific clinical presentation and underwent several surgical procedures combined with antiparasitic agents, highlighting the necessity of customized treatment in order to decrease complications and successfully cure the disease.
Background: Surgical treatment for rectal cancer may cause complications that exacerbate the condition, lengthen hospital stays, and raise healthcare costs. Rectal cancer surgery complications can be detected immediately with postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) monitoring. Elevated levels of CRP indicate the presence of inflammation and can serve as a predictive factor for future outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on 67 rectal cancer surgery patients. Prior to and after surgery, CRP levels were measured on days 1–3 and 4–7. Postoperative complications were linked to CRP, surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, conversion), and patient characteristics. This study included t-tests, chi-square tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, ANOVA, Pearson and Spearman correlation analyses, and logistic regression. Results: There was a significant correlation between high levels of CRP on postoperative days 4–7 and the development of problems (p < 0.001). The ratios of CRP/albumin and CRP/platelet were highly predictive of problems over this period (p = 0.000033). Patients who encountered problems had a notably greater estimated blood loss (p = 0.0086). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores and an elevated probability of experiencing problems (p = 0.0078). Moreover, patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery but had to be converted to an open method saw a notably greater incidence of complications (p = 0.0022). From a financial standpoint, the average cost per patient with complications was EUR 1128.75, resulting in a total cost of EUR 44,021.25 for all 39 patients. Conversely, patients who did not experience any difficulties had a cost of EUR 731.25 per patient, resulting in a total of EUR 20,475.00 for all 28 patients. Conclusions: Regularly monitoring CRP, particularly between days 4 and 7 following surgery for rectal cancer, can promptly identify any complications. Monitoring CRP levels and promptly managing any abnormalities can enhance surgical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.
Background: Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess (KLAS) is a potentially life-threatening condition with variable outcomes. Identifying risk factors for mortality is crucial for improving patient management. We aimed to analyze factors associated with in-hospital mortality in a cohort of patients with KLAS and review current diagnostic and treatment challenges. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical, laboratory, microbiological, and treatment data from 20 patients admitted with KLAS. Patients were divided into survivor (n = 15) and non-survivor (n = 5) groups. Univariate analyses were performed using appropriate statistical tests to compare groups and identify mortality-related factors. Results: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 25.0% (5/20). Factors significantly associated with mortality included undergoing laparotomy drainage (60.0% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.018) and developing in-hospital complications (80.0% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.002). Laparoscopic drainage was significantly associated with survival (93.3% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.026). Trends toward increased mortality were observed with diabetes mellitus and higher glucose levels at admission. Despite p-values < 0.05 from prior Fisher’s exact test, and the fact that ESBL positivity (OR = 22, 95% CI 0.86–571.32) and septic shock at admission (OR = 16.08, 95% CI 0.75–343.64) showed a very high point estimate for risk of mortality, the association was not statistically significant in our study. Conclusions: Mortality in this KLAS cohort was considerable. The necessity for open drainage and the development of in-hospital complications emerged as significant predictors of death, while other independent risk factor such as diabetes mellitus, high blood glucose levels at admission, septic shock at admission, and ESBL-positive strains indicated a trend towards unfavorable outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of aggressive sepsis management and addressing antimicrobial resistance. Conflicting results regarding the statistical significance of independent risk factors due to a limited sample size highlight the need for larger studies to confirm these findings.
Background: Biliary peritonitis is a severe intra-abdominal emergency with high mortality. Effective management requires source control and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Methods: This review synthesizes recent literature (2016–2025), as well as established guidelines recommendations on the evolving microbiology and antimicrobial resistance patterns in biliary tract infections, as data on biliary peritonitis is scarce and relatively heterogeneous. Results: The microbiological landscape is stratified by patient history. Community-acquired infections are typically caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus spp. In contrast, healthcare-associated infections show a shift, with highly resistant pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and a tendency towards polymicrobial infections. The rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE), is a critical challenge limiting therapeutic options. Resistance patterns vary geographically, necessitating the use of local data. Conclusions: This review argues for a paradigm shift from severity-based guidelines to a dual-axis model incorporating resistance risk factors (prior healthcare exposure, previous biliary interventions, a history of MDR infections). We propose a risk-stratified approach to empiric antibiotic selection, emphasizing microbiological diagnostics for therapy de-escalation. Future research should focus on prospective studies, novel antibiotics, and rapid diagnostics.
Iatrogenic bile duct injury (IBDI) constitutes a major complication of cholecystectomy. The optimal timing, method, and setting for definitive repair remain subjects of debate. This study aimed to systematically evaluate management strategies, timing of repair, and prognostic factors influencing postoperative outcomes following IBDI. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines (PROSPERO CRD420251003227). PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched through March 2025. Eligible randomized trials and cohort studies reporting management outcomes were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently. Pooled analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Twenty-eight studies (2 randomized trials, 24 cohort studies, 2 systematic reviews) involving >18,000 patients were analyzed. Surgical repair achieved higher success than endoscopic therapy (92.6% vs. 76.1%; RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10–1.35) and reduced stricture risk (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15–0.38). Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy provided durable outcomes (success 83.5%; stricture 8.9%). Early (6 weeks) repair after sepsis control was associated with lower morbidity (9–11%) compared with intermediate repair (2–6 weeks). Referral to hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) centers reduced complications (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23–0.46). Overall morbidity and mortality were 22.7% and 2.9%. Outcomes following IBDI are determined primarily by surgical expertise and patient stability rather than timing alone. In optimized patients, both early and delayed reconstruction are safe and effective, whereas intermediate repair and non-specialist interventions increase risk. Timely referral to HPB centers should be considered standard practice.