BACKGROUND: This descriptive study evaluates the impact on endometrial development of standard and high doses of a GnRH antagonist in stimulated cycles compared with GnRH agonist and natural cycles. METHODS: Thirty-one oocyte donors were treated with a combination of rFSH and 0.25 mg/day ganirelix (standard dose), 2 mg/day ganirelix (high dose) or 0.6 mg/day buserelin (long protocol). Vaginal progesterone (200 mg/day) was administered in the luteal phase. Endometrial biopsies were performed 2 and 7 days after HCG administration. Additional biopsies were carried out in a subset of 12 subjects, 2 and 7 days following the LH peak of their previous natural cycle. Biopsies were evaluated histologically and by scanning electron microscopy. Gene expression profiles were also studied. RESULTS: At HCG +2, all the parameters studied were similar in all the groups and comparable to those observed in the natural cycle. At HCG +7, endometrial dating, steroid receptors and the presence of pinopodes were comparable in both GnRH antagonist groups and in the natural cycle. In buserelin group, endometrial dating and pinopode expression suggested an arrested endometrial development. For window of implantation genes, expression patterns were closer to those in the natural cycle following standard- or high-dose ganirelix than after buserelin administration. CONCLUSION: No relevant alteration was observed in the endometrial development in the early and mid-luteal phases in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte donation following daily treatment with a standard- or high-dose GnRH antagonist. In addition, the endometrial development after GnRH antagonist mimics the natural endometrium more closely than after GnRH agonist.

Highly purified hMG (hp-hMG) has recently shown better cycle outcome than the recombinant FSH (rFSH) when compared in GnRH agonist long protocol cycles. However, they have not yet been compared in GnRH antagonist cycles. A RCT comparing the ongoing pregnancy rate (primary end-point) in 280 patients undergoing IVF/ICSI after stimulation with hp-hMG or rFSH controlled with a GnRH antagonist. No significant differences were observed between hp-hMG and rFSH in terms of the ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle (35.0 versus 32.1%, respectively; P = 0.61); relative risk: 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 0.78–1.51; risk difference: 2.9%). No differences were observed for implantation, clinical pregnancy and pregnancy loss rates. More oocytes were obtained from patients receiving rFSH then hMG (14.4 ± 8.1 versus 11.3 ± 6.0, respectively; P = 0.001). Estradiol was higher at the end of stimulation in the hp-hMG group (P = 0.02), whereas progesterone was higher in patients stimulated with rFSH (P < 0.001). A similar outcome was observed for hp-hMG and rFSH when used for stimulation in GnRH antagonist cycles. However, some differences were found in ovarian response in terms of oocyte yield and hormonal profile. Clinical Trials.gov Trial registration number: NCT00669786.

BACKGROUND: In order to investigate whether gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists exert a significant effect on steroid secretion in vivo compared with GnRH agonists, concentrations of sex steroid hormones (oestradiol, progesterone and testosterone) were studied in follicular fluid from women undergoing ovarian stimulation and treated with either GnRH agonist or antagonist. In addition, the correlation between follicular fluid steroid hormone concentrations and variables of follicular and oocyte development was evaluated. METHODS: Microparticle enzyme immunoassay and radioimmunoassays were used. RESULTS: The mean (SEM) follicular fluid oestradiol concentration was significantly lower in patients treated with GnRH antagonist than in those treated with GnRH agonist (542.0 ± 76.9 versus 873.0 ± 105.1 pg/ml, P = 0.02), which correlates with the mean serum oestradiol concentrations found in these two groups. No significant differences were found between groups in follicular fluid progesterone concentrations. Women undergoing GnRH antagonist treatment showed similar concentrations of follicular fluid testosterone compared with GnRH agonist-treated women (14.8 ± 1.1 versus 13.3 ± 2.7 ng/ml). The oestradiol:testosterone ratio was markedly reduced in women treated with GnRH antagonist (49.1 ± 2.3 versus 60.1 ± 4.4, P = 0.04). In contrast, no differences were found either in the progesterone:testosterone ratio, or in the oestradiol:progesterone ratio. CONCLUSIONS: GnRH antagonist therapy in women undergoing ovarian stimulation had a significant effect on ovarian follicular steroidogenesis.