Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: Mental health issues have become a significant global public health challenge. Traditional assessments rely on subjective methods with limited ecological validity. Passive sensing via wearable devices and smartphones, combined with machine learning (ML), enables objective, continuous, and noninvasive mental health monitoring. Objective: This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current state of passive sensing-based and machine learning (ML) technologies for mental health monitoring. We summarize the technical approaches, reveal the association patterns between behavioral features and mental disorders, and explore potential directions for future advancements. Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched seven major databases (Web of Science, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, etc.) for studies published between 2015 and 2025. A total of 42 studies were included. Information was extracted from dimensions such as data collection, preprocessing, feature engineering, ML methods, and validation, integrating the association patterns between behavioral features (e.g., sleep, activity, social interaction) and mental disorders (e.g., depression, anxiety). Results: The study found that the most commonly used digital biomarkers were heart rate (n=28), movement index (n=25), and step count (n=17), which were significantly associated with mental disorders such as depression and anxiety. Deep learning models (e.g., CNN, LSTM) performed exceptionally well in processing time-series data. However, traditional methods (e.g., random forest, XGBoost), due to their higher interpretability, remain widely adopted. Current studies face challenges such as small sample sizes (median = 60.5 participants), short data collection periods (45.24% of studies had data collection periods of less than 7 days), and limited device variety (76.19%). Additionally, only one study conducted external validation, limiting the clinical generalizability of the models. On the ethical front, only a few studies (14.29%) explicitly mentioned data anonymization, highlighting the need for enhanced privacy protection and algorithm fairness. Conclusions: The combination of passive sensing technologies and machine learning offers innovative solutions for mental health monitoring. However, key challenges, including data quality, model generalization, and ethical standards, need to be addressed before clinical translation. Future research should focus on large-scale longitudinal data collection, multimodal data integration, algorithm optimization, and interdisciplinary collaboration to drive the widespread adoption and clinical application of these technologies.