Objectives/Hypothesis: Intracellular entry of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) depends on the interaction between its spike protein with the cellular receptor angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and depends on Furin‐mediated spike protein cleavage and spike protein priming by host cell proteases, including transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2). As the expression of ACE2, TMPRSS2, and Furin in the middle and inner ear remain unclear, we analyzed the expression of these proteins in mouse ear tissues.Study Design: Animal Research.Methods: We performed immunohistochemical analysis to examine the distribution of ACE2, TMPRSS2, and Furin in the Eustachian tube, middle ear spaces, and cochlea of mice.Results: ACE2 was present in the nucleus of the epithelium of the middle ear and Eustachian tube, as well as in some nuclei of the hair cells in the organ of Corti, in the stria vascularis, and the spiral ganglion cells. ACE2 was also expressed in the cytoplasm of the stria vascularis. TMPRSS2 was expressed in both the nucleus and cytoplasm in the middle spaces, with the expression being stronger in the nucleus in the mucosal epithelium of the middle ear spaces and Eustachian tube. TMPRSS2 was present in the cytoplasm in the organ of Corti and stria vascularis and in the nucleus and cytoplasm in the spiral ganglion. Furin was expressed in the cytoplasm in the middle ear spaces, Eustachian tube, and cochlea.Conclusions: ACE2, TMPRSS2, and Furin are diffusely present in the Eustachian tube, middle ear spaces, and cochlea, suggesting that these tissues are susceptible to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.Level of Evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 131:E2013–E2017, 2021
Objective To predict round window niche (RWN) visibility using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Study design Case series with chart review. Setting Academic tertiary care center. Subjects and methods We retrospectively reviewed 70 cochlear implant ears that underwent presurgical axial HRCT with a surgical video recorder. The visibility of the RWN was classified into three types: 17 as invisible or nearly invisible, 22 as partially visible, and 31 as fully visible. Next, we measured the following three radiologic parameters: 1) the angle of the external auditory canal (EAC) relative to the cochlear basal turn, 2) the width of the facial recess, and 3) the relative location of the facial nerve (FN) to the cochlear basal turn. These were compared with the RWN visibility. Subsequently, to predict the RWN visibility, a line was created parallel to the EAC line and along the anterior lateral FN. The location of the line relative to the round window membrane was compared with the RWN view. Results In cases that had poor RWN visibility, the angle of the posterior canal wall portion of the EAC relative to the cochlear basal turn was significantly smaller and the location of the FN to the cochlear basal turn was closer. The location of the prediction line to the round window membrane highly predicted the RWN view during the surgery. Conclusion The RWN visibility and the preoperative HRCT findings showed a high correlation. Drawing the prediction line is a simple and useful way for preoperatively predicting the RWN visibility in cochlear implant surgery.
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is known to provide excellent tumor control with functional preservation for vestibular schwannomas (VS), but its efficacy in the other major intracranial schwannomas including trigeminal (TS), facial (FS), and jugular foramen schwannomas (JFS) has not been established yet due to their rarity. We retrospectively analyzed data of 514 consecutive patients who had intracranial schwannomas (460 VS, 22 TS, 7 FS, and 25 JFS) and underwent SRS. The 5- and 10-year tumor control rates were 97% and 94% for VS, 100% and 100% for TS, 80% and 80% for FS, and 100% and 80% for JFS. Radiation-induced complications included one hydrocephalus for TS (4.5%), no cases for FS (0%), and one hydrocephalus and one lower palsy for JFS (8.0%). Through matched cohort analysis between patients with VS and each of the non-VS, we found no statistical difference in tumor control and radiation-induced adverse events. SRS seems to provide long-term tumor control with functional preservation for TS, FS and JFS and the efficacies are similar to VS.
Objectives. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of cochlear implantation for sensorineural hearing loss in patients with Waardenburg syndrome.Method. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent cochlear implantation at the University of Tokyo Hospital. Clinical classification, genetic mutation, clinical course, preoperative hearing threshold, high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone, and postoperative hearing outcome were assessed.Result. Five children with Waardenburg syndrome underwent cochlear implantation. The average age at implantation was 2 years 11 months (ranging from 1 year 9 months to 6 years 3 months). Four patients had congenital profound hearing loss and one patient had progressive hearing loss. Two patients had an inner ear malformation of cochlear incomplete partition type 2. No surgical complication or difficulty was seen in any patient. All patients showed good hearing outcome postoperatively.Conclusion. Cochlear implantation could be a good treatment option for Waardenburg syndrome.
To conduct a longitudinal national survey of cochlear implantation (CI) in Japan from 1985 through 2017. A retrospective analysis of adult and pediatric CI cases from 1985 to 2017 using the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan CI registration database was conducted. Surgical statistics were obtained, including number of surgeries, age, implanted side, facilities, and preoperative threshold levels for CI. Since 1985, more than 11,100 CI surgeries have been conducted in Japan. The number exceeded 500 in 2005 and 1,000 in 2015. Since 2007, pediatric cases consistently surpassed adult cases until 2016. More facilities meet criteria for conducting CI as determined by Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare and have now reached more than 100. Adult patients over 70 years old have become proportionally higher. Age at implantation steadily reduced in accordance with modifications of Japanese CI guidelines for children but is still not comparable to that in other developed countries. Although the number of CI surgeries for patients with moderate to severe hearing loss increased in the past ten years, the proportion was small. The CI database in Japan is quite unique in that it documents almost all the CI surgeries in Japan, allowing us to summarize the present situation as follows: fewer CI surgeries occur than are necessary, and children receiving implants are older than those in other developed countries. Continuous improvement of CI awareness is needed in Japan.