Mary Beth Privitera

Dr. Mary Beth Privitera

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2017 in Applied Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMary Beth Privitera
Mary Beth Privitera
MEMark Evans
Mark Evans
DSDarren John Southee
Darren John Southee
This paper focuses on the challenges of meeting agency requirements as it pertains to the application of human factors in the medical device development (MDD) process. Individual case studies of the design and development process for 18 medical device manufacturers located in the US and EU were analyzed and compared using a multiple case study design. The results indicate that there are four main challenges in implementing international standards. These include a lack of direct access to users for the purposes of device development; a lack of understanding by users with regards to the impact of their feedback on the development process; contract formalities limiting user exchanges; and the attitude of clinical users directly impacting on the device developer's invitation to participate in the development processes. The barriers presented in this research have the potential to be resolved but only with greater commitment by both medical device users and developers.

1 September 2009 in 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
MPMary Beth Privitera
Mary Beth Privitera
MDM. Design
M. Design
DMDale L. Murray
Dale L. Murray
This paper describes methodology for determining user needs within the design process currently being used by the University of Cincinnati's Medical Device Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program. Topics such as ethnography (user observation and interviews), task analysis, and human factors for product embodiment are discussed. Specific tools for data gathering, analysis and synthesis towards determining design considerations, requirements and specifications are defined.


1 April 2005 in Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TBTimothy J. Broderick
Timothy J. Broderick
MPMary Beth Privitera
Mary Beth Privitera
SPScott E. Parazynski
Scott E. Parazynski
MCMarsh Cuttino
Marsh Cuttino
Introduction: Previous simulation and porcine experiments aboard the reduced gravity program KC-135 turbojet have demonstrated that microgravity surgery is feasible. Ideally, surgical care in spaceflight will incorporate recent advances in care while remaining easy enough for a crew medical officer (CMO) lacking surgical proficiency or extensive surgical experience to perform. As a minimally invasive surgical technique, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) benefits the patient via smaller incisions, less pain, and faster recovery than traditional open surgery. HALS also helps less experienced laparoscopic surgeons perform laparoscopic surgery. Methods: An inexpensive inanimate surgical simulator was constructed to evaluate the usefulness of HALS in microgravity. This simulator was utilized during brief periods of microgravity provided by parabolic flight on the KC-135. The simulator was successfully used by both a physician-astronaut and an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. Task completion included simulated surgery with exploration of the intestines and ligation of the appendix. Results: Simulated HALS was successfully performed in microgravity. HALS effectively contained operative equipment and small amounts of introduced fluids within the simulated abdominal cavity. Astronaut and surgeon experience suggest that HALS could facilitate minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in microgravity. Discussion: HALS holds promise as a surgical approach in microgravity, particularly as space travel extends beyond low earth orbit. HALS provides the benefits of MIS, facilitates MIS surgery by less surgically proficient or experienced CMOs, and contains equipment and fluid within the operative field. Simulation provides an easy, cost-effective platform to evaluate medical technology for space flight as well as a method to train CMOs on-orbit.

5 June 2013 in Pediatric Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SKSoumya R. Kashinkunti
Soumya R. Kashinkunti
RNRami A. Nachabe
Rami A. Nachabe
JRJudy M. Racadio
Judy M. Racadio
NJNeil D. Johnson
Neil D. Johnson
KKKamlesh U. Kukreja
Kamlesh U. Kukreja
TATodd A. Abruzzo
Todd A. Abruzzo

1 September 2009 in 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
MPMary Beth Privitera
Mary Beth Privitera
JJJeffrey Johnson
Jeffrey Johnson
MDM. Design
M. Design
The relationship between basic science research and product design/development are intertwined. This paper explores the definition of basic science and design as it relates to medical device development. It is intended to serve as a reference for both researchers and device developers to assist in trans-disciplinary collaborative efforts in improving patient care as each are of equal importance. The definition of a medical device is broad and varied. This paper is aimed towards those devices which interact with tissue and are rooted in the tenets of science. Both the scientific method and the design process are compared with similarities and opposites identified. The paper concludes identifying fundamental principles of medical device development and highlights the importance of both entities.