Purpose: Carbon-ion beam (C-beam) has a sharp dose distribution called the Bragg peak. Carbon-ion radiation therapy, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy in photon radiotherapy, can be completed in a short period by concentrating the radiation dose on the tumor while minimizing the dose to organs at-risk. However, the stopping position of C-beam is sensitive to density variations along the beam path and such variations can lower the tumor dose as well as cause the delivery of an unexpectedly high dose to the organs at risk. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of a robust planning technique considering gastrointestinal gas (G-gas) to deliver accurate radiation doses in carbon-ion radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer.Materials and methods: We focused on the computed tomography (CT) value replacement method. Replacement signifies the overwriting of CT values in the CT images. The most effective replacement method for robust treatment planning was determined by verifying the effects of the three replacement patterns. We selected 10 consecutive patients. Pattern 1 replaces the CT value of the G-gas contours with the value of the region without G-gas (P1). This condition indicates a no-gas state. Pattern 2 replaces each gastrointestinal contour using the mean CT value of each contour (P2). The effect of G-gas was included in the replacement value. Pattern 3 indicates no replacement (P3). We analyzed variations in the target coverage (TC) and homogeneity index (HI) from the initial plan using in-room CT images. We then performed correlation analysis on the variations in G-gas, TC, and HI to evaluate the robustness against G-gas.Results: Analysis of variations in TC and HI revealed a significant difference between P1 and P3 and between P2 and P3. Although no statistically significant difference was observed between P1 and P2, variations, including the median, tended to be fewer in P2. The correlation analyses for G-gas, TC, and HI showed that P2 was less likely to be affected by G-gas.Conclusion: For a treatment plan that is robust to G-gas, P2 mean replacement method should be used. This method does not necessitate any particular software or equipment, and is convenient to implement in clinical practice.

Background/Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the dose distribution between scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy (sCIRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy with stereotactic body radiation therapy (VMAT-SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Fifteen patients with early-stage NSCLC who underwent sCIRT at Kanagawa Cancer Center between 2018-2020 were enrolled. Dose-volume histogram parameters of the planned target volume and normal organs for sCIRT and VMAT-SBRT were evaluated. Results: The homogeneity index of the target volume of sCIRT was significantly lower than that of VMAT-SBRT. The dose of sCIRT was significantly lower than that of VMAT-SBRT at low volumes in the lung, heart, spinal cord, and esophagus. Conclusion: The dose distribution of sCIRT for early-stage NSCLC was better than that of VMAT-SBRT.

Radioactivity was measured in a micellar gel dosimeter, a polymer gel dosimeter, and water was irradiated by carbon ion beams at various beam energy conditions. Monte Carlo simulation was also performed to estimate the radioactivity. Short-lived positron-emitting nuclides were observed immediately after irradiation, but they decayed rapidly into the background. At 24 h post-irradiation, the dominant measured radioactivity was of ⁷Be. The simulation also showed minor activity of ²⁴Na and ³H; however, they were not experimentally observed. The measured radioactivity was independent of the type of gel dosimeter under all irradiation conditions, suggesting that the radioactivity was induced by the interaction of carbon ions with water (the main component of the gel dosimeters). The ratio between the simulated and measured radioactivity was within 0.9–1.5. The activity concentration of ⁷Be was found to be less than 1/10 of the value derived using the exemption concept proposed by the International Atomic Energy Agency. This result should be applicable to irradiated gel dosimeters containing mainly water and 0–4 wt.% C and 0–1.7 wt.% N.

This study aimed to establish a treatment planning strategy with carbon-ion scanning radiotherapy (CIRTs) for stage I esophageal cancer. The clinical data of seven patients treated with CIRTs were used. The setup error and interfractional and intrafractional motion error were analyzed using in-room computed tomography (CT) images for each treatment day. Finally, the planning target volume (PTV) margin was identified according to the accuracy of the treatment system. To ensure robustness against the positional displacements of the target and organs at risk (OAR), the replacement areas were placed as a contour adjacent to the tumor or OAR on the CT-image. The CT values of these areas were replaced by those of the target or OAR. Further, the dose distributions were optimized. Moreover, the variations in the target coverage from the initial plan for each treatment day (ΔV95%) were evaluated. By contrast, the risk of OAR was not evaluated in this study. The setup error was within 1.0 mm. The interfractional and intrafractional target motion errors were 2.8 and 5.0 mm, respectively. The PTV margins were 6.5 and 6.8 mm in the axial and depth directions, respectively. The robustness to target and OAR displacement was evaluated. The results showed that the target coverage with replacement could suppress decreased target coverage more than that without replacement. The PTV determination and replacement methods used in this study improved the target coverage in CIRTs for stage I esophageal cancer. Despite the need for a clinical follow-up, this method may help to improve clinical outcomes.

Background/Aim: The current study aimed to evaluate a treatment planning method that is robust against tumor growth and to assess its effectiveness in particle therapy for head and neck cancer. Patients and Methods: The proposed method optimizes dose distribution by replacing the relative stopping power ratio (rSPR) of the clinical target volume (CTV) cavity region with a tumor-equivalent rSPR (Condition 1). The optimized initial treatment plan template was then recalculated using in-room CT images acquired in the same treatment position, and the doses to the tumor and organs at risk were compared with those in the initial treatment plan. We evaluated this method in 10 patients with head and neck cancer treated with carbon ion radiotherapy. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we compared it to the initial treatment plan without the replacement (Condition 2). Results: CTV V95% reduction relative to that of the initial treatment plan at the end of treatment was 1.3%±2.9% and 2.6%±3.7% for Condition 1 and Condition 2, respectively, with Condition 1 (Replacement condition) providing better CTV coverage. Subgroup analysis showed a higher change in target coverage in the mucosal melanoma than in the adenoid cystic carcinoma, suggesting that this was influenced by the rate of tumor growth. Conclusion: The proposed treatment planning method, which adjusts for tumor growth by modifying the rSPR in the cavity region, improved robustness in carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Condition 1 (with replacement) achieved better CTV coverage than Condition 2 (without replacement), particularly in fast-growing tumors like mucosal melanoma. This method ensures consistent dose delivery to tumors while maintaining safe doses to organs at risk, offering potential for improved treatment outcomes.