Kirk A. Moloney

Dr. Kirk A. Moloney


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

44Years (1983-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 January 2004 in Oikos
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TWThorsten Wiegand
Thorsten Wiegand
KMKirk A. Moloney
Kirk A. Moloney

1 December 1999 in The American Naturalist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TWThorsten Wiegand
Thorsten Wiegand
KMKirk A. Moloney
Kirk A. Moloney
JNJavier Naves
Javier Naves
FKFelix Knauer
Felix Knauer
We construct and explore a general modeling framework that allows for a systematic investigation of the impact of changes in landscape structure on population dynamics. The essential parts of the framework are a landscape generator with independent control over landscape composition and physiognomy, an individual-based spatially explicit population model that simulates population dynamics within heterogeneous landscapes, and scale-dependent landscape indices that depict the essential aspects of landscape that interact with dispersal and demographic processes. Landscape maps are represented by a grid of [Formula: see text] cells and consist of good-quality, poor-quality, or uninhabitable matrix habitat cells. The population model was shaped in accordance to the biology of European brown bears (Ursus arctos), and demographic parameters were adjusted to yield a source-sink configuration. Results obtained with the spatially explicit model do not confirm results of earlier nonspatial source-sink models where addition of sink habitat resulted in a decrease of total population size because of dilution of high-quality habitat. Our landscape indices, which describe scale-dependent correlation between and within habitat types, were able to explain variations in variables of population dynamics (mean number of females with sink home ranges, mean number of females with source home ranges, and mean dispersal distance) caused by different landscape structure. When landscape structure changed, changes in these variables generally followed the corresponding change of an appropriate landscape index in a linear way. Our general approach incorporates source-sink dynamics as well as metapopulation dynamics, and the population model can easily be modified for other species groups.

19 January 2005 in Conservation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TWThorsten Wiegand
Thorsten Wiegand
EREloy Revilla
Eloy Revilla
KMKirk A. Moloney
Kirk A. Moloney

1 March 1996 in Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKirk A. Moloney
Kirk A. Moloney
SLSimon A. Levin
Simon A. Levin
Phenomena such as disturbance play a major role in structuring ecological systems by producing a spatiotemporal mosaic of patches at different successional states. The distribution of species within the resulting mosaic depends upon an interaction between species' life history traits and the spatial and temporal structure of the ecological processes controlling species' distributions. We have used a spatially explicit simulation model (Jasper) of a serpentine grassland to examine the importance of some of these relationships, focusing primarily on the role of disturbance. The model Jasper is hierarchical in design and was developed to simulate the population dynamics of three interacting plant species: Bromus mollis, Calycadenia multiglandulosa, and Plantago erecta. Population dynamics were modeled as occurring within local sites, which were then arranged in a square array to form a landscape. Connections among sites within a landscape were made primarily through seed dispersal. Several components of disturbance architecture were varied systematically among model runs to determine their impact on population dynamics at the scale of the landscape. We considered three levels of organization in modeling disturbance: (1) overall rate of disturbance, (2) size of individual disturbances, and (3) temporal and spatial autocorrelation among individual disturbances. The results demonstrate that the impact of disturbance depends upon a complex interaction between the life history characteristics of the species making up the community and the spatial and temporal structure of the disturbance regime. For example, we found that the biggest impact on species abundance occurred in response to a shift in the temporal autocorrelation structure of the disturbance regime. Also, species diversity was found to increase at intermediate levels of disturbance (as has been shown in several other studies). However, what can be considered an intermediate level of disturbance depends as much upon the temporal autocorrelation structure of the disturbance regime as it does upon the absolute rate of disturbance. These results suggest that predicting the impact of disturbance on ecological communities will require an explicit understanding of at least some aspects of the spatial and temporal architecture of the disturbance regime.

18 April 2005 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LMLeanne M. Martin
Leanne M. Martin
KMKirk A. Moloney
Kirk A. Moloney
BWBrian J. Wilsey
Brian J. Wilsey

1 October 1998 in Journal of Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FJF. Jeltsch
F. Jeltsch
SMS.J. Milton
S.J. Milton
WDW.R.J. Dean
W.R.J. Dean
NRN. van Rooyen
N. van Rooyen
KMKirk A. Moloney
Kirk A. Moloney