Knee osteoarthritis is a common degenerative joint disease characterized by chronic knee pain and disability in daily living. The lesion can involve the cartilage as well as the synovium, bone, ligaments, and meniscus, indicating a complicated pathology for knee osteoarthritis. The association with the meniscus has recently attracted much attention. Meniscal tears can initiate and progress knee osteoarthritis, with deleterious effects on the important roles of the meniscus in load distribution, shock absorption, and stability of the knee joint. Degenerative meniscus lesions are commonly observed in elderly people, but they have less impact on the prognosis of osteoarthritis. However, they are often accompanied by meniscal extrusion, which substantially decreases the hoop function of the meniscus and increases the risk of knee osteoarthritis. When surgical treatment is necessary, meniscal tears should be repaired to the greatest extent possible to preserve meniscus function. Long-term studies show better clinical outcomes and less degenerative osteoarthritis changes following meniscal repair than following partial meniscectomy. For meniscal extrusion repair, centralization techniques have been proposed that involve suturing the meniscus-capsule complex to the edge of the tibial plateau. Advancements in orthobiologics, such as platelet-rich plasma or stem cell therapy, have the potential to prevent the initiation or progression of osteoarthritis.

We have been studying mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in synovial fluid and the intra-articular injection of synovial MSCs in osteoarthritis (OA) knees. Here, mainly based on our own findings, we overview the characteristics of endogenous MSCs in the synovial fluid of OA knees and their mode of action when injected exogenously into OA knees. Many MSCs similar to synovial MSCs were detected in the synovial fluid of human OA knees, and their number correlated with the radiological OA grade. Our suspended synovium culture model demonstrated the release of MSCs from the synovium through a medium into a non-contacting culture dish. In OA knees, endogenous MSCs possibly mobilize in a similar manner from the synovium through the synovial fluid and act protectively. However, the number of mobilized MSCs is limited; therefore, OA progresses in its natural course. Synovial MSC injections inhibited the progression of cartilage degeneration in a rat OA model. Injected synovial MSCs migrated into the synovium, maintained their MSC properties, and increased the gene expressions of TSG-6, PRG-4, and BMP-2. Exogenous synovial MSCs can promote anti-inflammation, lubrication, and cartilage matrix synthesis in OA knees. Based on our findings, we have initiated a human clinical study of synovial MSC injections in OA knees.

The recently developed arthroscopic centralization for lateral meniscal extrusion has obtained satisfactory short‐term clinical and radiological results and improves the meniscus biomechanical properties. However, the effectiveness of treatment for meniscus extrusion after partial meniscectomy still requires elucidation. This study investigated the effect of centralization with modifications from a mechanical viewpoint. Porcine knee joints (N = 6) were set in a universal tester under the following conditions: (1) Intact; (2) Meniscectomy: Inner half of the posterior half meniscus was removed; (3) Extrusion: Posterior meniscus was dislocated laterally by transecting the posterior root and the meniscotibial ligament; (4) Centralization‐1: Centralization procedure using one anchor; (5) Centralization‐2: Centralization procedure using two anchors; and (6) Centralization‐ad: Centralization with capsular advancement using two anchors. Load distributions and contact pressure in the meniscus and tibial cartilage were evaluated with an axial compressive force of 200 N. After meniscectomy, the tibial cartilage load increased and that of the medial margin of the posterior part of the meniscus decreased. When the meniscus was extruded, the load was concentrated only on the tibial cartilage. Centralization‐1 increased the load on the meniscus, while Centralization‐2 further increased the meniscus load but decreased the tibial cartilage load. Centralization‐ad further decreased the load on the tibial plateau. The average contact pressure of the tibial cartilage was significantly higher in the Extrusion group than in the Intact group or the Centralization‐ad group. From a biomechanical viewpoint, centralization with capsular advancement was the most effective of the tested procedures for treatment for an extruded meniscus after partial meniscectomy.

Background: Meniscal extrusion results in loss of the ability to resist hoop strain and biomechanical overload on the joint articular surface. A centralization technique has been developed to overcome these problems. In this study, we analyzed the biomechanics of the extruded and centralized lateral meniscus (LM) in porcine knee joints at different flexion angles. Methods: Porcine knee joints (n = 8) were set in the universal tester and each knee was tested under the following states: 1) intact; 2) extrusion—meniscal extrusion was created by resecting the posterior root of the LM and posterior synovial capsule; and 3) centralization—centralization was performed by two anchors inserted in the lateral tibial plateau. Deviation distance of the meniscus, contact pressure, and contact area in the anterior LM, middle LM, posterior LM, and the contact pressure of the tibial cartilage were evaluated with an axial compressive force of 200 N at knee flexion angles of 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°. Results: The deviation distance of LM significantly increased in extrusion but was restored to the intact status after centralization at all angles. Both the contact pressure and area significantly decreased in extrusion and were restored after centralization close to the intact status in the anterior and middle LM; in the posterior LM, however, decreased contact pressure and area were not restored after centralization. The contact pressure of the tibial cartilage increased significantly in extrusion but decreased close to the intact status after centralization. Conclusions: This centralization procedure could reduce extrusion of the LM and restore the load-distributing function of the anterior-middle LM. However, the procedure itself could not restore hoop function in cases where the defect lies in the posterior LM.

We have developed a fully automatic three-dimensional MRI analysis software program for automatic segmentation of knee cartilage using a deep neural network. The purpose of this study was to use this software to clarify the interscan measurement error of the knee cartilage thickness and projected cartilage area ratio at 9 regions and 45 subregions in the knee. Ten healthy volunteers underwent MRI twice in the same day. The software provided cartilage thickness and projected cartilage area ratio (thickness ≥ 1.5 mm) at 9 regions and 45 subregions of the knee without any manual correction. The interscan measurement error was calculated at each region and subregion from the data of nine donors, except for one donor who had body motion during the MRI examination. The interscan measurement error of cartilage thickness was less than 0.10 mm at all 9 regions and at 39 subregions among 45 subregions. The measurement errors ranged from 0.03 to 0.21 mm. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of cartilage thickness were higher than 0.75 at all 9 regions and 41 subregions. The interscan measurement error of the projected cartilage area ratio ranged from 0.01 to 0.03 for all 9 regions. This study clarified the interscan measurement error of the knee cartilage thickness and projected cartilage area ratio.

Background: We have developed 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis software that allows measurement of the projected cartilage area ratio with a particular thickness intended to allow quantitation of the cartilage in the knee. Our aims in this study were to validate the projected cartilage area ratio in both pig and human knees and to examine the ratio in patients reporting knee pain. Methods: After 3D MRI reconstruction, the femoral cartilage was projected onto a flat surface. The projected cartilage area was determined in pig knees using our 3D MRI analysis software, and was compared with the area obtained with other software. The projected cartilage area ratio (for cartilage thickness ≥1.5 mm) at 4 segments was also validated in human knees. Finally, changes in the projected cartilage area ratio were examined in 8 patients with knee pain who had undergone 2 MR images at 3 to 21-month intervals. Results: The projected cartilage areas determined with our 3D MRI analysis software were validated in pig knees. The projected cartilage area ratio at each segment in human knees had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.87 to 0.99 (n = 16) between readers and 0.76 to 0.99 (n = 20) between measurements on repeat MR images. The projected cartilage area ratio (for cartilage thickness ≥1.5 mm) at the most affected segment in 8 human patients significantly decreased between the pairs of MR images obtained at intervals of 3 to 21 months. Conclusions: We proposed a novel evaluation method using 3D MRI to quantify the amount of cartilage in the knee. This method had a low measurement error in both pig and human knees. Clinical Relevance: The projected cartilage area ratio based on a particular thickness may serve as a sensitive method for assessing changes in cartilage over time.