Sabine Franckenberg

Dr. Sabine Franckenberg

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 April 2021 in International journal of legal medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LELars Christian Ebert
Lars Christian Ebert
SFSabine Franckenberg
Sabine Franckenberg
TSTill Sieberth
Till Sieberth
WSWolf Schweitzer
Wolf Schweitzer
MTMichael Thali
Michael Thali
SDSummer Decker
Summer Decker
Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) is a standard image modality used in forensic death investigations. Case- and audience-specific visualizations are vital for identifying relevant findings and communicating them appropriately. Different data types and visualization methods exist in 2D and 3D, and all of these types have specific applications. 2D visualizations are more suited for the radiological assessment of PMCT data because they allow the depiction of subtle details. 3D visualizations are better suited for creating visualizations for medical laypersons, such as state attorneys, because they maintain the anatomical context. Visualizations can be refined by using additional techniques, such as annotation or layering. Specialized methods such as 3D printing and virtual and augmented reality often require data conversion. The resulting data can also be used to combine PMCT data with other 3D data such as crime scene laser scans to create crime scene reconstructions. Knowledge of these techniques is essential for the successful handling of PMCT data in a forensic setting. In this review, we present an overview of current visualization techniques for PMCT.

8 October 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAnton S. Becker
Anton S. Becker
CZCaroline Zellweger
Caroline Zellweger
SBSara Bacanovic
Sara Bacanovic
SFSabine Franckenberg
Sabine Franckenberg
HNHannes W. Nagel
Hannes W. Nagel
IBIrene A. Burger
Irene A. Burger
Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is a specialized form of adipose tissue, able to increase energy expenditure by heat generation in response to various stimuli. Recently, its pathological activation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cancer cachexia. To establish a causal relationship, we retrospectively investigated the longitudinal changes in BAT and cancer in a large FDG-PET/CT cohort. We retrospectively analyzed 13 461 FDG-PET/CT examinations of n = 8 409 patients at our institution from the winter months of 2007–2015. We graded the activation strength of BAT based on the anatomical location of the most caudally activated BAT depot into three tiers, and the stage of the cancer into five general grades. We validated the cancer grading by an interreader analysis and correlation with histopathological stage. Ambient temperature data (seven-day average before the examination) was obtained from a meteorological station close to the hospital. Changes of BAT, cancer, body mass index (BMI) and temperature between the different examinations were examined with Spearman’s test and a mixed linear model for correlation, and with a causal inference algorithm for causality. We found n = 283 patients with at least two examinations and active BAT in at least one of them. There was no significant interaction between the changes in BAT activation, cancer burden or BMI. Temperature changes exhibited a strong negative correlation with BAT activity (ϱ = -0.57, p<0.00001). These results were confirmed with the mixed linear model. Causal inference revealed a link of Temperature ➜ BAT in all subjects and also of BMI ➜ BAT in subjects who had lost weight and increased cancer burden, but no role of cancer and no causal links of BAT ➜ BMI. Our data did not confirm the hypothesis that BAT plays a major role in cancer-mediated weight loss. Temperature changes are the main driver of incidental BAT activity on FDG-PET scans.

1 March 2015 in Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSabine Franckenberg
Sabine Franckenberg
FKFabian Kern
Fabian Kern
MVMichael Vogt
Michael Vogt
MTMichael J. Thali
Michael J. Thali
PFPatricia M. Flach
Patricia M. Flach

1 May 2016 in Legal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GAGaryfalia Ampanozi
Garyfalia Ampanozi
UHUlrike Held
Ulrike Held
TRThomas D. Ruder
Thomas D. Ruder
SRSteffen G. Ross
Steffen G. Ross
WSWolf Schweitzer
Wolf Schweitzer
PFPatricia M. Flach
Patricia M. Flach

1 February 2013 in Forensic Science International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRCarolina Rohner
Carolina Rohner
SFSabine Franckenberg
Sabine Franckenberg
NSNicole Schwendener
Nicole Schwendener
AOAndrea Oestreich
Andrea Oestreich
TKThomas Kraemer
Thomas Kraemer
TRThomas D. Ruder
Thomas D. Ruder

18 August 2021 in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFederico Massini
Federico Massini
LELars Ebert
Lars Ebert
GAGaryfalia Ampanozi
Garyfalia Ampanozi
SFSabine Franckenberg
Sabine Franckenberg
LBLena Benz
Lena Benz
TSTill Sieberth
Till Sieberth
Evidence acquisition, interpretation and preservation are essential parts of forensic case work that make a standardized documentation process fundamental. The most commonly used method for the documentation and interpretation of superficial wounds is a combination of two modalities: two-dimensional (2D) photography for evidence preservation and real-life examination for wound analysis. As technologies continue to develop, 2D photography is being enhanced with three-dimensional (3D) documentation technology. In our study, we compared the real-life examination of superficial wounds using four different technical documentation and visualization methods.To test the different methods, a mannequin was equipped with several injury stickers, and then the different methods were applied. A total of 42 artificial injury stickers were documented in regard to orientation, form, color, size, wound borders, wound corners and suspected mechanism of injury for the injury mechanism. As the gold standard, superficial wounds were visually examined by two board-certified forensic pathologists directly on the mannequin. These results were compared to an examination using standard 2D forensic photography; 2D photography using the multicamera system Botscan©, which included predefined viewing positions all around the body; and 3D photogrammetric reconstruction based on images visualized both on screen and in a virtual reality (VR) using a head-mounted display (HMD).The results of the gold standard examination showed that the two forensic pathologists had an inter-reader agreement ranging from 69% for the orientation and 11% for the size of the wounds. A substantial portion of the direct visual documentation showed only a partial overlap, especially for the items of size and color, thereby prohibiting the statistical comparison of these two items. A forest plot analysis of the remaining six items showed no significant difference between the methods. We found that among the forensic pathologists, there was high variability regarding the vocabulary used for the description of wound morphology, which complicated the exact comparison of the two documentations of the same wound.There were no significant differences for any of the four methods compared to the gold standard, thereby challenging the role of real-life examination and 2D photography as the most reliable documentation approaches. Further studies with real injuries are necessary to support our evaluation that technical examination methods involving multicamera systems and 3D visualization for whole-body examination might be a valid alternative in future forensic documentation.