Dingqiang Li

Prof. Dr. Dingqiang Li

Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GWGao-Ling Wei
Gao-Ling Wei
DLDingqiang Li
Dingqiang Li
MZMu-Ning Zhuo
Mu-Ning Zhuo
YLYi-Shan Liao
Yi-Shan Liao
ZXZhen-Yue Xie
Zhen-Yue Xie
ZLZhi-Quan Liang
Zhi-Quan Liang

1 July 2016 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GWGao-Ling Wei
Gao-Ling Wei
XLXiao-Liang Liang
Xiao-Liang Liang
DLDingqiang Li
Dingqiang Li
MZMu-Ning Zhuo
Mu-Ning Zhuo
SZSi-Yi Zhang
Si-Yi Zhang
ZYZai-Jian Yuan
Zai-Jian Yuan

5 September 2017 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BHBin Huang
Bin Huang
ZLZhongwu Li
Zhongwu Li
DLDingqiang Li
Dingqiang Li
ZYZaijian Yuan
Zaijian Yuan
ZCZhiliang Chen
Zhiliang Chen
JHJinquan Huang
Jinquan Huang

22 April 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Bin HuangBin Huang
Bin Huang
ZYZaijian Yuan
Zaijian Yuan
MZMingguo Zheng
Mingguo Zheng
YLYishan Liao
Yishan Liao
KNK. LOI NGUYEN
K. LOI NGUYEN
DLDingqiang Li
Dingqiang Li
Soil and water loss is a severe environmental problem in tropical and subtropical Asia (TSA). This review systematically summarizes the techniques that have been widely applied in the TSA region and compares the conservation efficiency of these techniques based on the runoff and sediment reduction ratios (ηr and ηs). The results show that the current techniques can be divided into biological, engineering and agricultural practice measures, and in most cases, their efficiencies in reducing sediment loss (ηs = 14.0–99.5%, 61.3–100.0% and 0.6–95.4%, respectively) were higher than in reducing runoff loss (ηr = 2.8–9.38%, 0.28–83.3% and 1.62–70.2%, respectively). Monocultures of single tree species (e.g., Pinus massoniana) sometimes showed very limited conservation effects. Vetiver and alfalfa were more effective at reducing soil loss than other hedgerow species. Contour tillage, ridge farming, and reduced tillage generally showed high efficiencies in reducing soil loss compared with other agricultural practice measures. The combination of engineering and biological techniques could more effectively reduce soil and water loss compared with the application of these techniques along. Future works should be conducted to build unified technical standards and reasonable comprehensive evaluation systems, to combine these techniques with environmental engineering technologies, and to develop new amendment materials.