Martin Alexander Kennedy

Prof. Martin Alexander Kennedy

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 July 2019 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AIAnorexia Nervosa Genetics Initiative
Anorexia Nervosa Genetics Initiative
HWHunna J. Watson
Hunna J. Watson
ECEating Disorders Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
Eating Disorders Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
ZYZeynep Yilmaz
Zeynep Yilmaz
LTLaura M. Thornton
Laura M. Thornton
CBCynthia Bulik
Cynthia Bulik

20 March 2020 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKatrina Grasby
Katrina Grasby
NJNeda Jahanshad
Neda Jahanshad
JPJodie Painter
Jodie Painter
LCLucía Colodro Conde
Lucía Colodro Conde
JBJanita Bralten
Janita Bralten
EGEnhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis Consortium (ENIGMA)—Genetics working group
Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis Consortium (ENIGMA)—Genetics working group
INTRODUCTION: The cerebral cortex underlies our complex cognitive capabilities. Variations in human cortical surface area and thickness are associated with neurological, psychological, and behavioral traits and can be measured in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Studies in model organisms have identified genes that influence cortical structure, but little is known about common genetic variants that affect human cortical structure. RATIONALE: To identify genetic variants associated with human cortical structure at both global and regional levels, we conducted a genome-wide association meta-analysis of brain MRI data from 51,665 individuals across 60 cohorts. We analyzed the surface area and average thickness of the whole cortex and 34 cortical regions with known functional specializations. RESULTS: We identified 369 nominally genome-wide significant loci ( P < 5 × 10 −8 ) associated with cortical structure in a discovery sample of 33,992 participants of European ancestry. Of the 360 loci for which replication data were available, 241 loci influencing surface area and 66 influencing thickness remained significant after replication, with 237 loci passing multiple testing correction ( P < 8.3 × 10 −10 ; 187 influencing surface area and 50 influencing thickness). Common genetic variants explained 34% (SE = 3%) of the variation in total surface area and 26% (SE = 2%) in average thickness; surface area and thickness showed a negative genetic correlation ( r G = −0.32, SE = 0.05, P = 6.5 × 10 −12 ), which suggests that genetic influences have opposing effects on surface area and thickness. Bioinformatic analyses showed that total surface area is influenced by genetic variants that alter gene regulatory activity in neural progenitor cells during fetal development. By contrast, average thickness is influenced by active regulatory elements in adult brain samples, which may reflect processes that occur after mid-fetal development, such as myelination, branching, or pruning. When considered together, these results support the radial unit hypothesis that different developmental mechanisms promote surface area expansion and increases in thickness. To identify specific genetic influences on individual cortical regions, we controlled for global measures (total surface area or average thickness) in the regional analyses. After multiple testing correction, we identified 175 loci that influence regional surface area and 46 that influence regional thickness. Loci that affect regional surface area cluster near genes involved in the Wnt signaling pathway, which is known to influence areal identity. We observed significant positive genetic correlations and evidence of bidirectional causation of total surface area with both general cognitive functioning and educational attainment. We found additional positive genetic correlations between total surface area and Parkinson’s disease but did not find evidence of causation. Negative genetic correlations were evident between total surface area and insomnia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depressive symptoms, major depressive disorder, and neuroticism. CONCLUSION: This large-scale collaborative work enhances our understanding of the genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex and its regional patterning. The highly polygenic architecture of the cortex suggests that distinct genes are involved in the development of specific cortical areas. Moreover, we find evidence that brain structure is a key phenotype along the causal pathway that leads from genetic variation to differences in general cognitive function. Identifying genetic influences on human cortical structure.: ( A ) Measurement of cortical surface area and thickness from MRI. ( B ) Genomic locations of common genetic variants that influence global and regional cortical structure. ( C ) Our results support the radial unit hypothesis that the expansion of cortical surface area is driven by proliferating neural progenitor cells. ( D ) Cortical surface area shows genetic correlation with psychiatric and cognitive traits. Error bars indicate SE. IMAGE CREDITS: (A) K. COURTNEY; (C) M. R. GLASS

26 November 2018 in Nature Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RWRaymond K. Walters
Raymond K. Walters
RPRenato Polimanti
Renato Polimanti
EJEmma Johnson
Emma Johnson
JMJeanette N. McClintick
Jeanette N. McClintick
MAMark J. Adams
Mark J. Adams
AAArpana Agrawal
Arpana Agrawal

4 April 2017 in Molecular Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RCR C Culverhouse
R C Culverhouse
NSN L Saccone
N L Saccone
AHA C Horton
A C Horton
YMY Ma
Y Ma
KAK J Anstey
K J Anstey
LBL J Bierut
L J Bierut
The hypothesis that the S allele of the 5-HTTLPR serotonin transporter promoter region is associated with increased risk of depression, but only in individuals exposed to stressful situations, has generated much interest, research and controversy since first proposed in 2003. Multiple meta-analyses combining results from heterogeneous analyses have not settled the issue. To determine the magnitude of the interaction and the conditions under which it might be observed, we performed new analyses on 31 data sets containing 38 802 European ancestry subjects genotyped for 5-HTTLPR and assessed for depression and childhood maltreatment or other stressful life events, and meta-analysed the results. Analyses targeted two stressors (narrow, broad) and two depression outcomes (current, lifetime). All groups that published on this topic prior to the initiation of our study and met the assessment and sample size criteria were invited to participate. Additional groups, identified by consortium members or self-identified in response to our protocol (published prior to the start of analysis) with qualifying unpublished data, were also invited to participate. A uniform data analysis script implementing the protocol was executed by each of the consortium members. Our findings do not support the interaction hypothesis. We found no subgroups or variable definitions for which an interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype was statistically significant. In contrast, our findings for the main effects of life stressors (strong risk factor) and 5-HTTLPR genotype (no impact on risk) are strikingly consistent across our contributing studies, the original study reporting the interaction and subsequent meta-analyses. Our conclusion is that if an interaction exists in which the S allele of 5-HTTLPR increases risk of depression only in stressed individuals, then it is not broadly generalisable, but must be of modest effect size and only observable in limited situations.

22 September 2019 in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CNCharity Nofziger
Charity Nofziger
ATAmy J. Turner
Amy J. Turner
KSKatrin Sangkuhl
Katrin Sangkuhl
MWMichelle Whirl-Carrillo
Michelle Whirl-Carrillo
Jose AgundezJose Agundez
Jose Agundez
AGAndrea Gaedigk
Andrea Gaedigk
The Pharmacogene Variation Consortium (PharmVar) provides nomenclature for the highly polymorphic human CYP2D6 gene locus. CYP2D6 genetic variation impacts the metabolism of numerous drugs and, thus, can impact drug efficacy and safety. This GeneFocus provides a comprehensive overview and summary of CYP2D6 genetic variation and describes how the information provided by PharmVar is utilized by the Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB) and the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC).

26 January 2016 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ECEng Wee Chua
Eng Wee Chua
SCSimone L. Cree
Simone L. Cree
KTKim N. T. Ton
Kim N. T. Ton
KLKlaus Lehnert
Klaus Lehnert
PSPhillip Shepherd
Phillip Shepherd
MKMartin Alexander Kennedy
Martin Alexander Kennedy
Whole-exome sequencing (WES) has been widely used for analysis of human genetic diseases, but its value for the pharmacogenomic profiling of individuals is not well studied. Initially, we performed an in-depth evaluation of the accuracy of WES variant calling in the pharmacogenes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 by comparison with MiSeq® amplicon sequencing data (n = 36). This analysis revealed that the concordance rate between WES and MiSeq® was high, achieving 99.60% for variants that were called without exceeding the truth-sensitivity threshold (99%), defined during variant quality score recalibration. Beyond this threshold, the proportion of discordant calls increased markedly. Subsequently, we expanded our findings beyond CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 to include more genes genotyped by the iPLEX® ADME PGx Panel in the subset of twelve samples. WES performed well, agreeing with the genotyping panel in approximately 99% of the selected pass-filter variant calls. Overall, our results have demonstrated WES to be a promising approach for pharmacogenomic profiling, with an estimated error rate of lower than 1%. Quality filters, particularly variant quality score recalibration, are important for reducing the number of false variants. Future studies may benefit from examining the role of WES in the clinical setting for guiding drug therapy.