Background: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is nowadays considered a valuable minimally invasive approach to treat oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). The aim of this technique is to improve functional preservation and reduce morbidity with excellent oncologic outcomes compared to the traditional transoral approach and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The purpose of this systematic review is to assess an exhaustive overview of functional outcomes of TORS for OPSCC by evaluating several parameters reported in the available literature, such as the prevalence and dependence of tracheotomy, feeding tubes (FTs) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), the length of hospitalization, swallowing scores, speech tests and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires. Methods: A systematic literature review has been performed following the PRISMA 2020 checklist statement. A computer-aided search was carried out using an extensive set of queries on the Embase/PubMed, Scopus and Web of Sciences databases relating to papers published from 2007 to 2024. Results: A total of 28 papers were systematically reviewed, reporting 1541 patients’ data. The mean time of hospitalization was 6 days. A planned tracheotomy was performed in 8% of patients with a mean time of removal of 8 days. The prevalence and dependence of FT was 60% and 10%, respectively. Moreover, the presence of a high-stage T tumor with the contextual requirement of adjuvant therapies, the involvement of base tongues and the patient’s age being >55 years increased the risk of requiring an FT and PEG. Swallowing and long-term QoL outcomes highlight the superiority of the TORS approach alone compared to TORS with adjuvant therapies. Conclusions: TORS presented various favorable functional outcomes compared to other surgical approaches and primary CRT. However, adjuvant therapies after TORS strongly reduced the advantage of the robotic procedure, thus suggesting that T1 and T2 tumors may benefit mainly from TORS alone.

Background: Nowadays, head and neck surgical approaches need an increased level of anatomical knowledge and practical skills; therefore, the related learning curve is both flat and long. On such procedures, surgeons must decrease operating time as much as possible to reduce the time of general anesthesia and related stress factors for patients. Consequently, little time can be dedicated for training skills of students and young residents in the operating theater. Fresh human cadavers offer the most obvious surrogate for living patients, but they have several limitations, such as cost, availability, and local regulations. Recently, the feasibility of using ex vivo animal models, in particular ovine ones, have been considered as high-fidelity alternatives to cadaveric specimens. Methods: This comprehensive review explores all of head and neck otolaryngology applications with this sample. We analyzed studies about ear surgery, orbital procedures, parotid gland and facial nerve reanimation, open laryngeal and tracheal surgery, microlaryngoscopy procedures, laryngotracheal stenosis treatment, and diagnostic/operative pediatric endoscopy. For each different procedure, we underline the main applications, similarities, and limitations to human procedures so as to improve the knowledge of this model as a useful tool for surgical training. Results: An ovine model is easily available and relatively inexpensive, it has no limitations associated with religious or animal ethical issues, and it is reliable for head and neck surgery due to similar consistencies tissues and neurovascular structures with respect to humans. However, some other issues should be considered, such as differences about some anatomical features, the risk of zoonotic diseases, and the absence of bleeding during training. Conclusion: This comprehensive review highlights the potentials of an ex vivo ovine model and aims to stimulate the scientific and academic community to further develop it for other applications in surgical education.

Objective. Supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) represents a major surgical challenge in organ-preserving treatment. Type I open partial horizontal laryngectomy (OPHL I) is considered the most popular. To date, minimally-invasive approaches such as laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) have gained increasing relevance. The aim of this narrative review is to obtain a descriptive comparison of functional and oncological outcomes from studies on patients with supraglottic SCC treated with OPHL I and TORS, respectively. Material and methods. A computerised search was performed using the Pubmed database for articles published from 2000 to 2023. A comparative analysis on functional and oncological outcomes of patients treated by TORS and OPHL I was performed. Results. The present narrative review shows a superiority of TORS compared to open surgery for supraglottic SCC in terms of functional outcomes, while maintaining comparable oncological outcomes. Conclusions. Although recently introduced in the treatment of laryngeal pathology, TORS has been shown to be a reliable technique not only for functional but also for oncological outcomes, ensuring good overall survival, disease-free survival, and disease control rates comparable to OPHL I.

Introduction: Syphilis is a systemic bacterial infection caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum. Head and neck mucosal manifestations of syphilis can be observed in each and all of primary, secondary and tertiary syphilis, especially in the secondary one. Therefore, oropharynx is an unusual localization of syphilitic lesions, mainly represented by ulcerous lesions, tissue hypertrophy, mucosal patches and cancer-like lesions. Serology is routinely considered the gold standard for the screening and diagnosis of syphilis. However, direct detection is routinely used during polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of oropharyngeal tissue and suspicious cervical lymphadenopathies. Methods: PRISMA 2020 guidelines were applied to make a systematic literature review with the aim to make an overview of clinical manifestations and diagnostic tools of oropharyngeal syphilitic infection. A computerized MEDLINE search was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane databases. Results: The intended analysis was based on 38 papers, including a total of 55 cases. The main localization of oropharyngeal infection was the tonsil (71%), followed by lateral and posterior wall of oropharynx (16%). Ulcerous lesions were the most frequently encountered lesions in the primary syphilis (56%) and secondary syphilis (36%), whereas gumma’s lesions were encountered in the tertiary syphilis (57%). Diagnosis based on serological assays was used in combination with non-treponemal methods to determine disease activity (80% cases). Conclusions: Oropharyngeal syphilis has historically been referred to as the “great imitator” due to its highly variable manifestations, which can resemble malignancies. Physicians have to recognize oropharyngeal luetic features early, in order to set up an effective diagnostic and therapeutic work-up.