Adenomyosis is a commonly diagnosed benign condition characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial glands within the underlying myometrium. The most common presenting signs and symptoms are abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility. The clinical relevance of this condition is evident in both medical and surgical care. Histopathology and imaging studies are used for the diagnosis and classification of adenomyosis, which are hallmarks of the advancement of our ability to diagnose adenomyosis. Importantly, the diagnosis and classification of adenomyosis lacks standardization due to the nature of imaging techniques, features of adenomyosis, and the clinical spectrum of adenomyosis. We reviewed the literature to summarize the available classification systems for adenomyosis and highlight the different imaging approaches and histologic criteria used in diagnosis. Despite the high prevalence of the disease, there is no clear consensus on one classification system. We provide a review of some of the classification systems available and discuss their strengths and limitations.

Uterine Adenomyosis is a benign condition characterized by the presence of endometrium-like epithelial and stromal tissue in the myometrium. Several medical treatments have been proposed, but still, no guidelines directing the management of adenomyosis are available. While a hysterectomy is typically regarded as the definitive treatment for adenomyosis, the scarcity of high-quality data leaves patients desiring fertility with limited conservative options. Based on the available data, the levonorgestrel-IUD appears to offer the most favorable outcomes. Other treatments, including GnRH antagonists, dienogest, prolactin, and oxytocin modulators, show promise; however, further data are required to establish their efficacy definitively. Furthermore, there are many emerging therapies that have been developed that seem worthy of consideration in the near future. The aim of this narrative review was to explore the current medical treatments available for adenomyosis and to provide a glimpse of future therapies under assessment. For this scope, we performed a literature search on PubMed and Medline from incept to September 2022 using the keywords: “medical treatment”, “non-steroidal anti-inflammatory”, “progesterone intrauterine device”, “dienogest”, “combined oral contraceptives”, “gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist”, “gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist”, “danazol”, “aromatase inhibitors”, “ulipristal acetate”, “anti-platelet therapy”, “dopamine”, “oxytocin antagonists”, “STAT3”, “KRAS”, “MAPK”, “micro-RNA”, “mifepristone”, “valproic acid”, “levo-tetrahydropalamatine”, and “andrographolide”. The search was limited to articles in English, with subsequent screening of abstracts. Abstracts were screened to select relevant studies.

PURPOSE: The new CAP guideline published in August 2022 recommends using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to test for mismatch repair defects in gastroesophageal (GE), small bowel (SB), or endometrial carcinoma (EC) cancers over next-generation sequencing assessment of microsatellite instability (NGS-MSI) for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy eligibility and states there is a preference to use IHC over NGS-MSI in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). METHODS: We assessed the concordance of NGS-MSI and IHC-MMR from a very large cohort across the spectrum of solid tumors. RESULTS: Of the over 190,000 samples with both NGS-MSI and IHC-MMR about 1,160 were initially flagged as discordant. Of those samples initially flagged as discordant, 50.9% remained discordant after being reviewed by an additional pathologist. This resulted in a final discordance rate of 0.31% (590/191,767). Among CRC, GE, SB and EC, 55.4% of mismatch repair proficient/MSI high (MMRp/MSI-H) tumors had at least one somatic pathogenic mutation in an MMR gene or POLE . Mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite stable (MMRd/MSS) tumors had a significantly lower rate of high tumor mutational burden than MMRp/MSI-H tumors. Across all solid tumors, MMRd/MSI-H tumors had significantly longer overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.47, P < .001) and post-ICI survival (HR, 1.82, P < .001) as compared with MMRp/MSS tumors. The OS for the MMRd/MSS group was slightly worse compared to the MMRp/MSI-H tumors, but this difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.73, P = .058), with a similar pattern when looking at post-ICI survival (HR, 0.43, P = .155). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that NGS-MSI is noninferior to IHC-MMR and can identify MSI-H tumors that IHC-MMR is unable to detect and conversely IHC-MMR can identify MMRd tumors that NGS-MSI misses.

The association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with increased risk for developing epithelial ovarian cancer is well established. However, the observed clinical differences, particularly the improved therapy response and patient survival in BRCA2-mutant patients, are unexplained. Our objective is to identify molecular pathways that are differentially regulated upon the loss of BRCA1 and BRCA2 functions in ovarian cancer. Transcriptomic and pathway analyses comparing BRCA1-mutant, BRCA2-mutant, and homologous recombination wild-type ovarian tumors showed differential regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Using Wnt3A-treated BRCA1/2 wild-type, BRCA1-null, and BRCA2-null mouse ovarian cancer cells, we observed preferential activation of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling in BRCA1/2 wild-type ovarian cancer cells, whereas noncanonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling was preferentially activated in the BRCA1-null ovarian cancer cells. Interestingly, BRCA2-null mouse ovarian cancer cells demonstrated a unique response to Wnt3A with the preferential upregulation of the Wnt signaling inhibitor Axin2. In addition, decreased phosphorylation and enhanced stability of β-catenin were observed in BRCA2-null mouse ovarian cancer cells, which correlated with increased inhibitory phosphorylation on GSK3β. These findings open venues for the translation of these molecular observations into modalities that can impact patient survival. Significance: We show that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation statuses differentially impact the regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, a major effector of cancer initiation and progression. Our findings provide a better understanding of molecular mechanisms that promote the known differential clinical profile in these patient populations.

Nuclear and cytoplasmic green fluorescence were measured in all cells from cultures represented in Figure 3C using image J. Nuclear (left panel) and cytoplasmic (right panel) quantifications are reported separately for each cell line. Statistical significance between control and treated cultures was not achieved.

Chord diagrams of top 10 differentially regulated Pathways and involved DEGs in BRCA2mt vs HRwt