The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of operating cash flow (OCF) on the likelihood and the duration of distressed firms returning to a profitable position for survival. By selecting 309 marginally distressed firms that are Taiwan listed firms, we identified 218 firms that survived from financial distress and 91 firms that did not survive from financial distress for the logistic regression model. We found that the greater adequacy, stability, and growth of changes in OCF and the higher liquidity, growth, and size of firms significantly increased the likelihood of firm survival, suggesting that a distressed firm is more likely to return to profitability for survival if it can improve OCF after suddenly encountering financial distress. Moreover, applying duration analysis, this study took a further step to investigate the time dependence of firm survival among 218 surviving firms. The results suggest that firms generating more OCF in the post-distress period and possessing higher profitability, liquidity, and growth in the pre-distress period significantly took less time on resolving financial distress for survival. However, an economic recession can significantly impede the time and speed of firm survival. Overall, the study found consistent and robust evidence that OCF is a reliable instrument to predict the likelihood and duration of survival for financially distressed firms. The study also provides practical implications for managers, investors, policymakers, and lenders who intend to promote firm financial performance and sustainability.

The purpose of the study is to investigate whether bank diversification influences borrowing firms’ financial constraints on investment decisions. It also analyzes whether the different dimensions of bank diversification could alleviate financial constraints to firm investment. Further, the role of bank diversification in achieving firm financial sustainability is explored. By applying the Two-step System GMM, this study examines the effect of changes in bank diversification on financial constraints to borrowing firm investment in a reduced-form investment model with a sample of 810 listed firms in Taiwan over the period 1997–2019. The empirical findings indicate that firms are financially constrained as well as there being a positive relationship between cash flow and investment among Taiwanese listed firms. Additionally, bank diversification significantly reduces the investment-cash flow sensitivity of firms, suggesting that bank diversification mitigates the financial constraints to borrowing firms. Moreover, the multi-diversification of a bank compared to single-diversification will have greater impact on mitigating the firms’ financial constraints on investment. Thus, bank diversification strategies are proposed in a bank-based financial system, leading to the easing of the borrowing firms’ financial constraints to investments.

This study investigates how corporate governance and changes in governance rankings influence firms’ cost of capital. Using data from 1723 Taiwanese listed firms, comprising 11,940 firm-year observations between 2017 and 2024, the analysis applies Taiwan’s corporate governance evaluation system, published by government-affiliated institutions. The results reveal a significant negative relationship between corporate governance and firms’ cost of capital, indicating that higher governance rankings are associated with lower financing costs. Moreover, when firms’ governance rankings improve, their cost of capital decreases, whereas downgrades lead to increases. These findings suggest that capital markets adjust firms’ cost of capital inversely in response to changes in governance rankings. The study further shows that the ability to reduce capital costs depends on firms’ governance levels; a downgrade results in a more pronounced cost increase for well-governed firms. Overall, this research provides empirical evidence from an emerging market and offers practical implications for firms, creditors, investors, and regulators aiming to enhance sustainable development, strengthen risk management, optimize investment selection, and improve corporate governance practices.