Background: Stroke is the second cause of mortality worldwide and the first in women. The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model to estimate the risk of mortality in the admission of patients who have not received reperfusion treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of a clinical–administrative database, reflecting all cases of non-reperfused ischaemic stroke admitted to Spanish hospitals during the period 2008–2012. A predictive model based on logistic regression was developed on a training cohort and later validated by the “hold-out” method. Complementary machine learning techniques were also explored. Results: The resulting model had the following nine variables, all readily obtainable during initial care. Age (OR 1.069), female sex (OR 1.202), readmission (OR 2.008), hypertension (OR 0.726), diabetes (OR 1.105), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.537), dyslipidaemia (0.638), heart failure (OR 1.518) and neurological symptoms suggestive of posterior fossa involvement (OR 2.639). The predictability was moderate (AUC 0.742, 95% CI: 0.737–0.747), with good visual calibration; Pearson’s chi-square test revealed non-significant calibration. An easily consulted risk score was prepared. Conclusions: It is possible to create a predictive model of mortality for patients with ischaemic stroke from which important advances can be made towards optimising the quality and efficiency of care. The model results are available within a few minutes of admission and would provide a valuable complementary resource for the neurologist.

Treatment with interferon-free direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has become the gold standard in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Nevertheless, little research about the metabolic impact of achieving sustained virological response (SVR) is available in HCV/HIV co-infected patients. This research aimed to evaluate early anthropometric, lipid and liver parameters changes after achieving SVR 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). A real-life retrospective descriptive before-after study assessed 128 DAA treatment episodes from 2015 to 2019 in HCV/HIV co-infected patients. Anthropometric parameters (weight, body mass index), lipid profile, genotype (GT) and viral load, liver data (basics laboratory necroinflammatory parameters and transient elastography (TE)) were collected before treatment with DAA (baseline), and when SVR12 was achieved. Significant increases (p < 0.01) were found in the early lipid profile, measured by LDLc (84.6 ± 35.0 vs. 108.6 ± 35.1 mg/dL) and total cholesterol (161.3 ± 41.0 vs. 183.3 ± 41.6 mg/dL). Significant changes (p < 0.05) were found in liver parameters, measured by ALT (58.2 ± 34.0 vs. 22.0 ± 16.0 U/L), bilirubin (0.8 ± 0.6 vs. 0.6 ± 0.5 mg/dL), albumin (4.2 ± 0.4 vs. 4.3 ± 0.3 g/dL) and liver stiffness (LS) (13.7 ± 13.3 vs. 11.8 ± 12.1 kPa). The main conclusions were that the use of DAA has an early negative impact on lipid metabolism. Achieving SVR12 against HCV leads to an early improvement in liver function and LS in HCV/HIV co-infected patients without interference with antiretroviral treatment (ART) and DAA. Short-term close lipid monitoring may be necessary when combining protease inhibitors. HCV-GT-3/HIV co-infected patients might require further close monitoring for residual fibrosis. These findings can be relevant for actual clinical practice.

Background/Objectives: Neck pain is a complex biopsychosocial condition that affects a significant proportion of the global population. Projections indicate that over the next 30 years, cervical pain will impact approximately 269 million individuals, positioning it as one of the primary drivers of healthcare expenditure and system burden worldwide. While exercise is a key approach for neck pain, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments delivered remotely remain underexplored. The aim of this study is to analyse the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the treatment of non-specific neck pain through a telerehabilitation programme based on cervical exercise and analgesic electrotherapy. Methods: This is a study protocol for an economic evaluation based on a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a sample size of 210 participants (N = 210). The sample will be evenly divided into two groups to perform the same cervical exercise programme combined with electroanalgesia: one group will receive the intervention via telerehabilitation, and the other will receive the intervention face-to-face. Three sessions will be held per week for eight weeks for a total of 24 sessions. Demographic and clinical data of the participants, healthcare resource utilisation, and associated costs will be collected. Assessments will be carried out throughout the study: before the first session (baseline), at 8 weeks (post-intervention), and 6 months after completion of the treatment (follow-up). Discussion: This study will make a significant contribution to reducing costs and improving the treatment of patients with non-specific chronic neck pain. The social perspective associated with economic evaluation will enable the investigation of indirect costs such as work absenteeism or expenses borne by the patient, providing useful data to optimise planning and decision-making in the healthcare sector.

Background: Stroke is a highly prevalent disease that can provoke severe disability. We evaluate a predictive model based on the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) compiled by the Spain Health Ministry, obtained for the period 2008–2012 for patients with ischaemic stroke in Spain, to establish the model’s validity and to optimise its calibration. The MBDS is the main clinical-administrative database for hospitalisations recorded in Spain, and to our knowledge, no predictive models for stroke mortality have previously been developed using this resource. The main study aim is to perform an external validation and recalibration of the coefficients of this predictive model with respect to a chronologically later cohort. Material and Methods: External validation (testing the model on a different cohort to assess its performance) and recalibration (validation with optimisation of model coefficients) were performed using the MBDS for patients admitted for ischaemic stroke in the period 2016–2018. A cohort study was designed, in which a recalibrated model was obtained by applying the variables of the original model without their coefficients. The variables from the original model were then applied to the subsequent cohort, together with the coefficients from the initial model. The areas under the curve (AUC) of the recalibration and the external validation procedure were compared. Results: The recalibrated model produced an AUC of 0.743 and was composed of the following variables: age (odds ratio, OR:1.073), female sex (OR:1.143), ischaemic heart disease (OR:1.192), hypertension (OR:0.719), atrial fibrillation (OR:1.414), hyperlipidaemia (OR:0.652), heart failure (OR:2.133) and posterior circulation stroke (OR: 0.755). External validation produced an AUC of 0.726. Conclusions: The recalibrated clinical model thus obtained presented moderate-high discriminant ability and was generalisable to predict death for patients with ischaemic stroke. Rigorous external validation slightly decreased the AUC but confirmed the validity of the baseline model for the chronologically later cohort.