(1) Introduction: Poor diet is the fourth-leading cause of mortality in Spain, where adherence to the Mediterranean diet has declined in recent decades. To remedy this situation, a series of food policies have been proposed that would be easier to implement if they had public support. (2) Material and methods: Cross-sectional study covering a representative sample of the Spanish population (n = 1002), using telephone interviews that addressed nine food policies under four headings, namely, advertising, labeling, composition, and provision and sale. The sociodemographic determinants of support for these policies were analyzed using the chi-squared (χ²) test and Poisson multiple regression models with robust variance. (3) Results: All the proposed measures received more than 60% support. The policies that received greatest support were those targeting labeling at 96.6%, while the policies that received the least support were those directed at banning free refills at restaurants, at 63%. Support for policies was higher among women, older adults, and persons professing left-wing ideological affiliations. Compared with men, women’s support for advertising policies was 21% higher: similarly, compared with the youngest age group (18–29 years), support by the over-65 segment for provision and sale policies was 52% higher. Support for composition policies was 28% lower among persons with right-wing as opposed to left-wing political sympathies. (4) Conclusions: The authorities enjoy the support of the Spanish public as regards implementing food policies proposed by experts and overcoming the resistance of sectors opposed to such measures.

(1) Background: Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages are an effective public health intervention, but can be difficult to implement in the absence of public support. This is the first study to analyze the Spanish population’s support for a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. (2) Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of a representative sample of the Spanish adult population (n = 1002), using a computer-aided telephone interview with a questionnaire on nutritional policies. The support for the tax was calculated by the percentage of those who agreed plus those who strongly agreed with the measure. The sociodemographic determinants of support for the tax were analyzed using chi-squared test (χ²) and Poisson multiple regression models with robust variance. (3) Results: Of the participants, 66.9% supported a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. Support for the tax was 9.2% higher (70% vs. 64.1%) when responders were first asked about support for tax relief and subsidies for healthy foods (p = 0.049). Support for the tax was 16% and 35% lower among persons reporting center and right-wing political sympathies (p < 0.01), and 16% lower among regular consumers of sugar-sweetened beverages (p = 0.01). (4) Conclusions: A clear majority of the Spanish population is in favor of imposing a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. Awareness-raising campaigns and a policy of combining the measure with subsidies or tax cuts on healthy foods could increase the level of support among those currently against the intervention.

Background: Chronic hepatitis B (HB) remains a significant global health concern, despite the widespread availability of the HB vaccine. While the standard vaccine demonstrates an impressive serological response rate exceeding 90%, a subset of individuals exhibit suboptimal immunity. This study aims to elucidate the efficacy of the AS04C-adjuvanted HB vaccine in addressing non-responsiveness. Methods: Conducted at the Preventive Medicine Service of the University Albacete Hospital in Spain from 2017 to 2021, this single-center observational study enrolled 195 patients. Among them, 126 (65%) were classified as non-responders following one or two complete standard vaccination courses. Results: After the administration of a complete four-dose regimen of the AS04C-adjuvanted vaccine, 73.81% of non-responder patients exhibited antibody titers indicative of robust immunity (anti-HBs >10). Conclusions: These findings underscore the pivotal role of the AS04C-adjuvanted HB vaccine in addressing non-responsiveness, emphasizing its potential as a crucial tool in augmenting immunization strategies for various populations. This includes non-responders to standard vaccination, individuals with chronic kidney disease, those requiring seroprotection due to factors like immunosuppression or occupational hazards, as well as patients for whom conventional revaccination strategies have proven futile. Additional research is needed to expand on the promising results obtained through our protocol.

Background Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages are an effective public health intervention, but can be difficult to implement in absence of public support. This is the first study to analyse the Spanish population’s support for a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages.Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of a representative sample of the Spanish adult population (n=1002), using a computer aided telephone interview with a questionnaire on nutritional policies. We then performed a descriptive analysis of support for the tax. The sociodemographic determinants of support for the tax were analysed using Chi-squared test (χ2) and Poisson multiple regression models.Results A total of 66.9% of participants supported the introduction of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages: this figure lies midway between the figure of 64.1% when responders were asked about the tax before being asked about subsidies and tax relief, and that of 70% when they were asked about the tax after being asked about subsidies and tax relief ( p =0.049). Support for the tax was respectively 16% and 35% lower among persons reporting centre and right-wing political affiliations than among those who professed left-wing ideological sympathies ( p <0.01), and 16% lower among regular consumers of sugar-sweetened beverages than among non-consumers of these drinks ( p =0.01).Conclusions A clear majority of the Spanish population is in favour of imposing a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. Awareness-raising campaigns and a policy of combining the measure with subsidies or tax cuts on healthy foods could increase the level of support among those currently against the intervention.