Maurizio Sanguinetti

Prof. Dr. Maurizio Sanguinetti

Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS UCSC Roma
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2018 in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ETEvelina Tacconelli
Evelina Tacconelli
ECElena Carrara
Elena Carrara
ASAlessia Savoldi
Alessia Savoldi
SHStephan Harbarth
Stephan Harbarth
MMMarc Mendelson
Marc Mendelson
AZAnna Zorzet
Anna Zorzet

1 May 2018 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AUA.J. Ullmann
A.J. Ullmann
JAJ.M. Aguado
J.M. Aguado
SAS. Arikan-Akdagli
S. Arikan-Akdagli
DDD.W. Denning
D.W. Denning
AGA.H. Groll
A.H. Groll
OCOliver A. Cornely
Oliver A. Cornely

13 January 2017 in Gut
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGiovanni Cammarota
Giovanni Cammarota
Gianluca IaniroGianluca Ianiro
Gianluca Ianiro
HTHerbert Tilg
Herbert Tilg
MRMirjana Rajilić-Stojanović
Mirjana Rajilić-Stojanović
PKPatrizia Kump
Patrizia Kump
AGAntonio Gasbarrini
Antonio Gasbarrini
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an important therapeutic option for Clostridium difficile infection. Promising findings suggest that FMT may play a role also in the management of other disorders associated with the alteration of gut microbiota. Although the health community is assessing FMT with renewed interest and patients are becoming more aware, there are technical and logistical issues in establishing such a non-standardised treatment into the clinical practice with safety and proper governance. In view of this, an evidence-based recommendation is needed to drive the practical implementation of FMT. In this European Consensus Conference, 28 experts from 10 countries collaborated, in separate working groups and through an evidence-based process, to provide statements on the following key issues: FMT indications; donor selection; preparation of faecal material; clinical management and faecal delivery and basic requirements for implementing an FMT centre. Statements developed by each working group were evaluated and voted by all members, first through an electronic Delphi process, and then in a plenary consensus conference. The recommendations were released according to best available evidence, in order to act as guidance for physicians who plan to implement FMT, aiming at supporting the broad availability of the procedure, discussing other issues relevant to FMT and promoting future clinical research in the area of gut microbiota manipulation. This consensus report strongly recommends the implementation of FMT centres for the treatment of C. difficile infection as well as traces the guidelines of technicality, regulatory, administrative and laboratory requirements.

17 April 2018 in Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FPFrancesca Romana Ponziani
Francesca Romana Ponziani
SBSherrie Bhoori
Sherrie Bhoori
CCChiara Castelli
Chiara Castelli
LPLorenza Putignani
Lorenza Putignani
LRLicia Rivoltini
Licia Rivoltini
VMVincenzo Mazzaferro
Vincenzo Mazzaferro

1 March 2015 in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGiovanni Cammarota
Giovanni Cammarota
Luca MasucciLuca Masucci
Luca Masucci
Gianluca IaniroGianluca Ianiro
Gianluca Ianiro
Stefano BibbòStefano Bibbò
Stefano Bibbò
GDG. Dinoi
G. Dinoi
AGA. Gasbarrini
A. Gasbarrini
Summary: Background: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy donors is considered an effective treatment against recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.Aim: To study the effect of FMT via colonoscopy in patients with recurrent C. difficile infection compared to the standard vancomycin regimen.Methods: In an open‐label, randomised clinical trial, we assigned subjects with recurrent C. difficile infection to receive: FMT, short regimen of vancomycin (125 mg four times a day for 3 days), followed by one or more infusions of faeces via colonoscopy; or vancomycin, vancomycin 125 mg four times daily for 10 days, followed by 125–500 mg/day every 2–3 days for at least 3 weeks. The latter treatment did not include performing colonoscopy. The primary end point was the resolution of diarrhoea related to C. difficile infection 10 weeks after the end of treatments.Results: The study was stopped after a 1‐year interim analysis. Eighteen of the 20 patients (90%) treated by FMT exhibited resolution of C. difficile‐associated diarrhoea. In FMT, five of the seven patients with pseudomembranous colitis reported a resolution of diarrhoea. Resolution of C. difficile infection occurred in 5 of the 19 (26%) patients in vancomycin (P < 0.0001). No significant adverse events were observed in either of the study groups.Conclusions: Faecal microbiota transplantation using colonoscopy to infuse faeces was significantly more effective than vancomycin regimen for the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection. The delivery of donor faeces via colonoscopy has the potential to optimise the treatment strategy in patients with pseudomembranous colitis.

1 June 2007 in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMario Tumbarello
Mario Tumbarello
Maurizio SanguinettiMaurizio Sanguinetti
Maurizio Sanguinetti
EMEva Montuori
Eva Montuori
ETEnrico Maria Trecarichi
Enrico Maria Trecarichi
Brunella PosteraroBrunella Posteraro
Brunella Posteraro
TSTeresa Spanu
Teresa Spanu
Bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms markedly increase the rates of treatment failure and death. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis to identify risk factors for mortality in adult in-patients with BSI caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-BSI). Particular attention was focused on defining the impact on the mortality of inadequate initial antimicrobial therapy (defined as the initiation of treatment with active antimicrobial agents >72 h after collection of the first positive blood culture). A total of 186 patients with ESBL-BSI caused by Escherichia coli ( n = 104), Klebsiella pneumoniae ( n = 58), or Proteus mirabilis ( n = 24) were identified by our microbiology laboratory from 1 January 1999 through 31 December 2004. The overall 21-day mortality rate was 38.2% (71 of 186). In multivariate analysis, significant predictors of mortality were inadequate initial antimicrobial therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 6.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.18 to 12.42; P < 0.001) and unidentified primary infection site (OR = 2.69; 95% CI = 1.38 to 5.27; P = 0.004). The inadequately treated patients (89 of 186 [47.8%]) had a threefold increase in mortality compared to the adequately treated group (59.5% versus 18.5%; OR = 2.38; 95% CI = 1.76 to 3.22; P < 0.001). The regimens most commonly classified as inadequate were based on oxyimino cephalosporin or fluoroquinolone therapy. Prompt initiation of effective antimicrobial treatment is essential in patients with ESBL-BSI, and empirical decisions must be based on a sound knowledge of the local distribution of pathogens and their susceptibility patterns.