Stefano Avenia

Dr. Stefano Avenia


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 February 2024 in Surgical Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Roberto CirocchiRoberto Cirocchi
Roberto Cirocchi
MCMaria Chiara Cianci
Maria Chiara Cianci
LALavinia Amato
Lavinia Amato
LPLuca Properzi
Luca Properzi
MBMassimo Buononato
Massimo Buononato
Antonino MorabitoAntonino Morabito
Antonino Morabito
Background: Conventional three-access laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) is currently the gold standard treatment, however, Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy (SILA) has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this systematic review/meta-analysis was to evaluate safety and efficacy of SILA compared with conventional approach. Methods: Per PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CLA vs SILA for acute appendicitis. The randomised Mantel–Haenszel method was used for the meta-analysis. Statistical data analysis was performed with the Review Manager software and the risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane "Risk of Bias" assessment tool. Results: Twenty-one studies (RCTs) were selected (2646 patients). The operative time was significantly longer in the SILA group (MD = 7,32), confirmed in both paediatric (MD = 9,80), (Q = 1,47) and adult subgroups (MD = 5,92), (Q = 55,85). Overall postoperative morbidity was higher in patients who underwent SILA, but the result was not statistically significant. In SILA group were assessed shorter hospital stays, fewer wound infections and higher conversion rate, but the results were not statistically significant. Meta-analysis was not performed about cosmetics of skin scars and postoperative pain because different scales were used in each study. Conclusions: This analysis show that SILA, although associated with fewer postoperative wound infection, has a significantly longer operative time. Furthermore, the risk of postoperative general complications is still present. Further studies will be required to analyse outcomes related to postoperative pain and the cosmetics of the surgical scar.

10 November 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Roberto CirocchiRoberto Cirocchi
Roberto Cirocchi
LPLaura Panata
Laura Panata
EGEwen Griffiths
Ewen Griffiths
GTGiovanni Domenico Tebala
Giovanni Domenico Tebala
MLMassimo Lancia
Massimo Lancia
AVAnna Maria Verdelli
Anna Maria Verdelli
Background. To define what type of injuries are more frequently related to medicolegal claims and civil action judgments. Methods. We performed a scoping review on 14 studies and 2406 patients, analyzing medicolegal claims related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy injuries. We have focalized on three phases associated with claims: phase of care, location of injuries, type of injuries. Results. The most common phase of care associated with litigation was the improper intraoperative surgical performance (47.6% ± 28.3%), related to a “poor” visualization, and the improper post-operative management (29.3% ± 31.6%). The highest rate of defense verdicts was reported for the improper post-operative management of the injury (69.3% ± 23%). A lower rate was reported in the incorrect presurgical assessment (39.7% ± 24.4%) and in the improper intraoperative surgical performance (21.39% ± 21.09%). A defense verdict was more common in cystic duct injuries (100%), lower in hepatic bile duct (42.9%) and common bile duct (10%) injuries. Conclusions. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the most common cause of claims, associated with lower rate of defense verdict, was the improper intraoperative surgical performance. The decision to take legal action was determined often for poor communication after the original incident.

25 August 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Roberto CirocchiRoberto Cirocchi
Roberto Cirocchi
FDFrancesca Duro
Francesca Duro
SAStefano Avenia
Stefano Avenia
MCMatteo Capitoli
Matteo Capitoli
GTGiovanni Domenico Tebala
Giovanni Domenico Tebala
RNRiccardo Nascimbeni
Riccardo Nascimbeni
Background: This systematic umbrella review aims to investigate and provide an analysis of guidelines regarding the treatment of diverticular abscesses. Material and methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the Cochrane Overviews of Reviews model and the ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines’; at the end of initial search, only 12 guidelines were included in this analysis. The quality of the guidelines was assessed by adopting the “Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II” (AGREE II). The comparative analysis of these guidelines has highlighted the presence of some differences regarding the recommendations on the treatment of diverticular abscesses. In particular, there are some controversies about the diameter of abscess to be used in order to decide between medical treatment and percutaneous drainage. Different guidelines propose different abscess diameter cutoffs, such as 3 cm, 4–5 cm, or 4 cm, for distinguishing between small and large abscesses. Conclusions: Currently, different scientific societies recommend that diverticular abscesses with diameters larger than 3 cm should be considered for percutaneous drainage whereas abscesses with diameters smaller than 3 cm could be appropriately treated by medical therapy with antibiotics; only a few guidelines suggest the use of percutaneous drainage for abscesses with a diameter greater than 4 cm. The differences among guidelines are the consequence of the different selection of scientific evidence. In conclusion, our evaluation has revealed the importance of seeking new scientific evidence with higher quality to either confirm, reinforce or potentially weaken the existing recommendations from different societies.

7 October 2024 in International Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Roberto CirocchiRoberto Cirocchi
Roberto Cirocchi
MMMatteo Matteucci
Matteo Matteucci
ELEleonora Lori
Eleonora Lori
Vito D'AndreaVito D'Andrea
Vito D'Andrea
AAAlberto Arezzo
Alberto Arezzo
Salvatore SorrentiSalvatore Sorrenti
Salvatore Sorrenti
Background: One of the most important surgical steps during thyroidectomy is the safe ligation of vessels. In fact, it is crucial to avoid postoperative bleeding and nerves’ injury. The “clamp and tie” technique was first introduced in the 19th century. Since then, a lot of other techniques have been adopted to facilitate the safe ligation and sectioning of thyroidal vessels; however, one of the most relevant advances is the introduction of energy-based devices (EBDs), which occurred three decades ago. Purpose: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of sutureless FOCUS harmonic scalpel (second-generation EBDs) versus conventional clamps-and-tie technique) in total thyroidectomy. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis represent the largest comparison in the literature between the thyroidectomy procedure with the second-generation advanced harmonic scalpel ultrasonic focus (UAS FOCUS) versus the conventional clamp-and-tie (CT) technique: as a matter of fact, it includes 43 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a total of 10 361 patients. The incidence of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was statistically lower in patients undergoing UAS (3.99%) rather than CT (5.23%) (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63–0.99). The incidence of transient hypocalcemia was 11.3% in patients who underwent thyroidectomy with UAS FOCUS and 15.4% in those who underwent thyroidectomy with CT. Conclusion: Sutureless EBD is associated with a lower risk of damage to the laryngeal nerves and parathyroid glands. The rate of hypocalcemia and nerve paresis is indeed lower due to less thermic damage. Sutureless EBD can also diminish the rate of postoperative bleeding and cervical hematoma, a rare but potentially fatal complication.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gioia BrachiniGioia Brachini
Gioia Brachini
MMMatteo Matteucci
Matteo Matteucci
Paolo SapienzaPaolo Sapienza
Paolo Sapienza
Roberto CirocchiRoberto Cirocchi
Roberto Cirocchi
Alessandro FavilliAlessandro Favilli
Alessandro Favilli
BCBruno Cirillo
Bruno Cirillo
Background: Knowledge of vascular anatomy and its possible variations is essential for performing embolization or revascularization procedures and complex surgery in the pelvis. The obturator artery (OA) is a branch of the anterior division of the internal iliac artery (IIA), and it has the highest frequency of variation among branches of the internal iliac artery. Possible anomalies of the origin of the obturator artery (OA) should be known when performing pelvic and groin surgery, where its control or ligation may be required. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis, based on Sanudo’s classification, is to analyze the origin of the obturator artery (OA) and its variants. Methods: Thirteen articles published between 1952 and 2020 were included. Results: The obturator artery (OA) was present in almost all cases (99.8%): the pooled prevalence estimate for the origin from the IIA axis was 77.7% (95% CI 71.8–83.1%) vs. 22.3% (95% CI 16.9–28.2%) for the origin from EIA axis. In most cases, the obturator artery (OA) originated from the anterior division trunk of the internal iliac artery (IIA) (61.6%). Conclusions: Performing preoperative radiological examination to determine the pelvic vascular pattern and having the awareness to evaluate possible changes in the obturator artery can reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury and complications.

10 February 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Roberto CirocchiRoberto Cirocchi
Roberto Cirocchi
GMgiulio mari
giulio mari
BABruno Amato
Bruno Amato
GTGiovanni Domenico Tebala
Giovanni Domenico Tebala
GPGeorgi Popivanov
Georgi Popivanov
RNRiccardo Nascimbeni
Riccardo Nascimbeni
Background and aim: Although sigmoidectomy is a well-standardized procedure for diverticular disease, there are still unclear areas related to the varying morphology and vascular supply of the sigmoid colon. The level of vascular ligation could affect the functional outcomes of patients operated on for diverticular disease. The aim of this review is to primarily evaluate sexual, urinary and defecatory function outcomes, as well as postoperative results, in patients who underwent surgery for diverticular disease, with or without inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) preservation. Materials and methods: The MEDLINE/PubMed, WOS and Scopus databases were interrogated. Comparative studies including patients who underwent sigmoidectomy for diverticular diseases were considered. Bowel function, genitourinary function, anastomotic leak, operation time, conversion to open surgery, anastomotic bleeding, bowel obstruction were the main items of interest. Results: Twelve studies were included in the review, three randomized and nine comparative studies. Bowel and genitourinary function are not differently affected by the level of vascular ligation. The site of ligation of IMA did not influence the rate of functional complications, anastomotic leak and bleeding. Of note, the preservation of IMA is associated with a higher conversion rate and longer operative time. Conclusions: Despite the heterogeneity of patient groups, and although the findings should be interpreted with caution, functional and clinical outcomes after sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease do not seem to be affected by the level of vascular ligation as long as the IMA is ligated far from its origin.