Background: Virtual reality (VR) produces a virtual manifestation of the real world and has been shown to be useful as a digital education modality. As VR encompasses different modalities, tools, and applications, there is a need to explore how VR has been used in medical education.Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to map existing research on the use of VR in undergraduate medical education and to identify areas of future research.Methods: We performed a search of 4 bibliographic databases in December 2020. Data were extracted using a standardized data extraction form. The study was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and reported in line with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines.Results: Of the 114 included studies, 69 (60.5%) reported the use of commercially available surgical VR simulators. Other VR modalities included 3D models (15/114, 13.2%) and virtual worlds (20/114, 17.5%), which were mainly used for anatomy education. Most of the VR modalities included were semi-immersive (68/114, 59.6%) and were of high interactivity (79/114, 69.3%). There is limited evidence on the use of more novel VR modalities, such as mobile VR and virtual dissection tables (8/114, 7%), as well as the use of VR for nonsurgical and nonpsychomotor skills training (20/114, 17.5%) or in a group setting (16/114, 14%). Only 2.6% (3/114) of the studies reported the use of conceptual frameworks or theories in the design of VR.Conclusions: Despite the extensive research available on VR in medical education, there continue to be important gaps in the evidence. Future studies should explore the use of VR for the development of nonpsychomotor skills and in areas other than surgery and anatomy.International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046986

Background: Extended reality, which encompasses virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), is increasingly used in medical education. Studies assessing the effectiveness of these new educational modalities should measure relevant outcomes using outcome measurement tools with validity evidence. Objective: Our aim is to determine the choice of outcomes, measurement instruments, and the use of measurement instruments with validity evidence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of VR, AR, and MR in medical student education. Methods: We conducted a systematic mapping review. We searched 7 major bibliographic databases from January 1990 to April 2020, and 2 reviewers screened the citations and extracted data independently from the included studies. We report our findings in line with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Results: Of the 126 retrieved RCTs, 115 (91.3%) were on VR and 11 (8.7%) were on AR. No RCT on MR in medical student education was found. Of the 115 studies on VR, 64 (55.6%) were on VR simulators, 30 (26.1%) on screen-based VR, 9 (7.8%) on VR patient simulations, and 12 (10.4%) on VR serious games. Most studies reported only a single outcome and immediate postintervention assessment data. Skills outcome was the most common outcome reported in studies on VR simulators (97%), VR patient simulations (100%), and AR (73%). Knowledge was the most common outcome reported in studies on screen-based VR (80%) and VR serious games (58%). Less common outcomes included participants’ attitudes, satisfaction, cognitive or mental load, learning efficacy, engagement or self-efficacy beliefs, emotional state, competency developed, and patient outcomes. At least one form of validity evidence was found in approximately half of the studies on VR simulators (55%), VR patient simulations (56%), VR serious games (58%), and AR (55%) and in a quarter of the studies on screen-based VR (27%). Most studies used assessment methods that were implemented in a nondigital format, such as paper-based written exercises or in-person assessments where examiners observed performance (72%). Conclusions: RCTs on VR and AR in medical education report a restricted range of outcomes, mostly skills and knowledge. The studies largely report immediate postintervention outcome data and use assessment methods that are in a nondigital format. Future RCTs should include a broader set of outcomes, report on the validity evidence of the measurement instruments used, and explore the use of assessments that are implemented digitally.

Patient and graft survival 20-years after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) are excellent. In children, attainment of normal growth, education and social adaptation to be an independent adult are equally important. This is particularly relevant for children who receive liver transplant at a young age, where infantile-onset liver disease, surgery and immunosuppression can adversely affect growth and neurodevelopment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term physical and psychosocial outcomes of pLT recipients with normal graft function. We coin the term ‘meaningful survival’. We performed a cross-sectional study of pLT recipients who received transplants between 1985 and 2004. A 20-year evaluation of physical health (growth, renal function), mental wellbeing and social outcomes (substance abuse, adherence, education, employment) was performed. All patients included were considered to have normal graft function. Eighty-four patients met study criteria. Median age at transplantation was 1.3 years (IQR 0·7–3·3 years), with median duration of follow-up of 20.2 years (18·0–23·5). At median of 20-years, 19 patients (23%) had chronic renal dysfunction and 3 patients (4%) had a BMI of >30 (mean 20·4). Evaluation of long-term psychosocial outcomes demonstrated 22 patients (26%) with mental health disorders. Substance abuse was lower than national average. 62 patients (74%) were in education, employment or training. Overall, only 26% of our cohort achieved a composite outcome of ‘meaningful survival’. This is the largest reported long-term study of biopsychosocial outcomes of pLT recipients with normal liver biochemistry, with follow-up upon completion of physical growth and senior school education. Importantly, despite normal liver function, many patients did not demonstrate ‘meaningful survival’. We must refocus our efforts towards better understanding the long-term outcomes of children. A ‘meaningful survival’ rather than mere survival should be our goal. None.

Liver transplantation for pediatric inherited metabolic liver diseases

The historical use of the term non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in obese/overweight children has been controversial as to the appropriateness of this terminology in children, and lately, in adults too. Newer game-changer terminology, metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), for this condition signifies a positive step forward that addresses the limitations of the previous definition for both adults and children. The prevalence of MAFLD has surged in tandem with the global rise in obesity rates, establishing itself as a predominant cause of chronic liver disease in both adult and pediatric populations. The adoption of the recently proposed nomenclature reflects a more encompassing comprehension of the disease and its etiology compared to its predecessor, NAFLD. Notably, the revised terminology facilitates the recognition of MAFLD as an autonomous condition while acknowledging the potential coexistence of other systemic fatty liver disorders. Particularly in children, this includes various paediatric-onset genetic and inherited metabolic disorders, necessitating thorough exclusion, especially in cases where weight loss interventions yield no improvement or in the absence of obesity. MAFLD presents as a multifaceted disorder; evidence suggests its origins lie in a complex interplay of nutritional, genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. Despite advancements, current non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers exhibit limitations in accuracy, often necessitating imaging and histological evaluations for definitive diagnosis. While dietary and lifestyle modifications stand as cornerstone measures for MAFLD prevention and management, ongoing evaluation of therapeutic agents continues. This article provides an overview of the latest developments and emerging therapies in the realm of paediatric MAFLD.