and In-Seob Lee

Dr. and In-Seob Lee


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in Korean Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Hyo Jung ParkHyo Jung Park
Hyo Jung Park
YSYongbin Shin
Yongbin Shin
JPJisuk Park
Jisuk Park
HKHyosang Kim
Hyosang Kim
ALand In-Seob Lee
and In-Seob Lee
KKKyung Won Kim
Kyung Won Kim
Park HJ, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2019 Oct;20:e101. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0470

1 January 2022 in Journal of Gastric Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHSun-Hwi Hwang
Sun-Hwi Hwang
DPDo Joong Park
Do Joong Park
HKHyung-Ho Kim
Hyung-Ho Kim
WHWoo Jin Hyung
Woo Jin Hyung
HHHoon Hur
Hoon Hur
SHSang-Uk Han
Sang-Uk Han
Hwang SH, et al. J Gastric Cancer. 2022 Apr;22(2):94-106. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2022.22.e8

12 February 2023 in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HCHeewon Chung
Heewon Chung
YKYousun Ko
Yousun Ko
ALand In-Seob Lee
and In-Seob Lee
HHHoon Hur
Hoon Hur
JHJimi Huh
Jimi Huh
Jinseok LeeJinseok Lee
Jinseok Lee
Background: Personalized survival prediction is important in gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy based on large datasets with many variables including time‐varying factors in nutrition and body morphometry. One year after gastrectomy might be the optimal timing to predict long‐term survival because most patients experience significant nutritional change, muscle loss, and postoperative changes in the first year after gastrectomy. We aimed to develop a personalized prognostic artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict 5 year survival at 1 year after gastrectomy.Methods: From a prospectively built gastric surgery registry from a tertiary hospital, 4025 gastric cancer patients (mean age 56.1 ± 10.9, 36.2% females) treated gastrectomy and survived more than a year were selected. Eighty‐nine variables including clinical and derived time‐varying variables were used as input variables. We proposed a multi‐tree extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, an ensemble AI algorithm based on 100 datasets derived from repeated five‐fold cross‐validation. Internal validation was performed in split datasets (n = 1121) by comparing our proposed model and six other AI algorithms. External validation was performed in 590 patients from other hospitals (mean age 55.9 ± 11.2, 37.3% females). We performed a sensitivity analysis to analyse the effect of the nutritional and fat/muscle indices using a leave‐one‐out method.Results: In the internal validation, our proposed model showed AUROC of 0.8237, which outperformed the other AI algorithms (0.7988–0.8165), 80.00% sensitivity, 72.34% specificity, and 76.17% balanced accuracy. In the external validation, our model showed AUROC of 0.8903, 86.96% sensitivity, 74.60% specificity, and 80.78% balanced accuracy. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the nutritional and fat/muscle indices influenced the balanced accuracy by 0.31% and 6.29% in the internal and external validation set, respectively. Our developed AI model was published on a website for personalized survival prediction.Conclusions: Our proposed AI model provides substantially good performance in predicting 5 year survival at 1 year after gastric cancer surgery. The nutritional and fat/muscle indices contributed to increase the prediction performance of our AI model.

12 February 2021 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKyung Won Kim
Kyung Won Kim
KLKoeun Lee
Koeun Lee
JLJung-Bok Lee
Jung-Bok Lee
TPTaeyong Park
Taeyong Park
SKSeungwoo Khang
Seungwoo Khang
ALand In-Seob Lee
and In-Seob Lee
Background: Patients with gastric cancer have an increased nutritional risk and experience a significant skeletal muscle loss after surgery. We aimed to determine whether muscle loss during the first postoperative year and preoperative nutritional status are indicators for predicting prognosis. Methods: From a gastric cancer registry, a total of 958 patients who received curative gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy for stage 2 and 3 gastric cancer and survived longer than 1 year were investigated. Clinical and laboratory data were collected. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was assessed based on the muscle area at the L3 level on abdominal computed tomography. Results: Preoperative nutritional risk index (NRI) and postoperative decrement of SMI (dSMI) were significantly associated with overall survival (hazards ratio: 0.976 [95% CI: 0.962–0.991] and 1.060 [95% CI: 1.035–1.085], respectively) in a multivariate Cox regression analysis. Recurrence, tumor stage, comorbidity index were also significant prognostic indicators. Kaplan-Meier analyses exhibited that patients with higher NRI had a significantly longer survival than those with lower NRI (5-year overall survival: 75.8% vs. 63.0%, P < 0.001). In addition, a significantly better prognosis was observed in a patient group with less decrease of SMI (5-year overall survival: 75.7% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.009). A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the performance of preoperative NRI and dSMI in mortality prediction was quite significant (AUC: 0.63, P < 0.001) and the combination of clinical factors enhanced the predictive accuracy to the AUC of 0.90 (P < 0.001). This prognostic relevance of NRI and dSMI was maintained in patients experiencing tumor recurrence and highlighted in those with stage 3 gastric adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: Preoperative NRI is a predictor of overall survival in stage 2 or 3 gastric cancer patients and skeletal muscle loss during the first postoperative year was significantly associated with the prognosis regardless of relapse in stage 3 tumors. These factors could be valuable adjuncts for accurate prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer patients.

1 December 2019 in Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKoeun Lee
Koeun Lee
KKKyung Won Kim
Kyung Won Kim
JLJung-Bok Lee
Jung-Bok Lee
YSYongbin Shin
Yongbin Shin
JJJin Kyoo Jang
Jin Kyoo Jang
ALand In-Seob Lee
and In-Seob Lee

25 May 2022 in Gut and Liver
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JNJin Hee Noh
Jin Hee Noh
JSJun Young Shin
Jun Young Shin
JLJeong Hoon Lee
Jeong Hoon Lee
YPYoung Soo Park
Young Soo Park
ALand In-Seob Lee
and In-Seob Lee
HJHwoon-yong Jung
Hwoon-yong Jung
Jin Hee Noh, Jun Young Shin, Jeong Hoon Lee, Young Soo Park, In-Seob Lee, Ga Hee Kim, Hee Kyong Na, Ji Yong Ahn, Kee Wook Jung, Do Hoon Kim, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song, Gin Hyug Lee, and Hwoon-Yong Jung. Gut and Liver 2023;17:69-77. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl210593