Özcan Yavaşi

Dr. Özcan Yavaşi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 May 2023 in Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SYSarper Yilmaz
Sarper Yilmaz
OKOnur Karakayali
Onur Karakayali
SYSerkan Yilmaz
Serkan Yilmaz
MÇMurat Çetin
Murat Çetin
SESerkan Emre Eroğlu
Serkan Emre Eroğlu
HAHaldun Akoglu
Haldun Akoglu
An earthquake measuring 7.7 magnitude on the Richter scale occurred at 04:17am on February 6, 2023 in the Pazarcık district of Kahramanmaraş province Turkey. In the hours following the 7.7 magnitude event in Kahramanmaraş, a second 7.6 magnitude earthquake struck the region and a third 6.4 magnitude earthquake struck Gaziantep, causing extensive damage and death. A total of ten provinces directly experienced the earthquake, including Kahramanmaraş, Hatay, Gaziantep, Osmaniye, Malatya, Adana, Diyarbakır, Şanlıurfa, Adıyaman, and Kilis. The official figures indicate 31,643 people were killed, 80,278 were injured, and 6,444 buildings were destroyed within seven days of the earthquakes (as of 12:00pm/noon on Monday, February 13th). The area affected by the earthquake has been officially declared to be 500km in diameter. This report primarily relies on observations made by pioneer Emergency Physicians (EPs) who went to the disaster areas shortly after the first earthquake (in the early stages of the disaster). According to their observations: (1) Due to winter conditions, there were transportation problems and a shortage of personnel reaching disaster areas on the first day after the disaster; (2) On the second day of the disaster, health equipment was in short supply; (3) As of the third day, health workers were unprepared in terms of knowledge and experience for the disaster; and (4) The subsequent deployment of health personnel to the disaster area was uncoordinated and unplanned on the following days, which resulted in the health personnel working there not being able to meet even their basic needs (such as food, heating, and shelter). During the first week, coordination was most frequently reported as the most significant problem.

1 October 2010 in European Journal of Emergency Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EÜErden Erol Ünlüer
Erden Erol Ünlüer
ÖYÖzcan Yavaşi
Özcan Yavaşi
OEOrhan Eroğlu
Orhan Eroğlu
CYCengiz Yilmaz
Cengiz Yilmaz
FAFunda Karbek Akarca
Funda Karbek Akarca
Our objective was to study the accuracy of emergency medicine [(EM) bedside ultrasonography (BUS)] and radiology residents performed ultrasonography (RUS) in patients with suspected mechanical small bowel obstruction (SBO). After a 6-h training program, from January to June 2009, four EM residents used BUS to prospectively evaluate the patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected SBO. Then, patients underwent RUS. Outcome was determined by surgical findings if they were operated upon or self-reported the condition upon telephone follow-up at 1-month. BUS and RUS results were compared with chi2 testing. Of the 174 enrolled patients, 90 patients were BUS-positive. Of these, surgical findings agreed with the BUS findings in 84 patients. In 78 cases, BUS was negative, and 76 of these patients had benign clinical courses. Six patients were excluded from the study. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio for BUS were 97.7, 92.7, 93.3, 97.4, and 13.4%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for RUS were 88.4, 100, 100, and 89.1%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of BUS and RUS were not statistically different from each other (kappa=0.81). The presence of dilated small bowel loops (>25 mm in jejunum or >15 mm in ileum) was the most sensitive (94%) and specific (94%) sonographic finding for SBO. Abdominal sonography for the diagnosis of SBO is a new application of BUS in the emergency department. EM residents can diagnose SBO using BUS with a high-degree of accuracy, comparable with that of radiology residents.

14 March 2011 in Emergency Medicine Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EÜErol Erden Ünlüer
Erol Erden Ünlüer
SBSerdar Bayata
Serdar Bayata
NPNursen Postaci
Nursen Postaci
MYMurat Yeşil
Murat Yeşil
ÖYÖzcan Yavaşi
Özcan Yavaşi
SASerhat Akay
Serhat Akay
Introduction The identification of diastolic heart failure (DHF) is important for determining the prognosis of congestive heart failure patients. This study attempted to determine the accuracy of emergency physicians who performed bedside echocardiography (BECH) in patients with diastolic dysfunction. Methods Three attending emergency physicians underwent 3 h of didactic and 3 h of hands-on training taught by a cardiology specialist for the echocardiographic diagnostic criteria of DHF. Between February and April 2010, the emergency physicians performed BECH for patients presenting with dyspnoea, and echocardiographic views were recorded. Our gold standard for the diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction was the cardiologists' echocardiography report. Results were compared with χ2 testing. Results Of the 69 enrolled patients, 51 were diagnosed as having diastolic dysfunction by emergency physicians. The sensitivity of BECH was 89% (77–95) and specificity was 80% (51–95) with 95% CI. The accuracy of the emergency physicians' echocardiographic diagnosis was 87%. Conclusion BECH performed by emergency physicians may serve as an objective, rapid, non-invasive tool in the assessment of patients presenting with dyspnoea in ED.

1 January 2016 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HKHizir Kazdal
Hizir Kazdal
AKAyhan Kanat
Ayhan Kanat
HFHuseyin Findik
Huseyin Findik
ASAhmet Sen
Ahmet Sen
BOBulent Ozdemir
Bulent Ozdemir
MIMehmet Fatih Inecikli
Mehmet Fatih Inecikli

1 May 2014 in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ÖYÖzcan Yavaşi
Özcan Yavaşi
EÜErden Erol Ünlüer
Erden Erol Ünlüer
KKKamil Kayayurt
Kamil Kayayurt
SESelim Ekinci
Selim Ekinci
CSCaner Sağlam
Caner Sağlam
MYMurat Yeşil
Murat Yeşil

20 April 2012 in International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKamil Kayayurt
Kamil Kayayurt
HAHaldun Akoglu
Haldun Akoglu
OLOnder Limon
Onder Limon
AEAsım Oktay Ergene
Asım Oktay Ergene
ÖYÖzcan Yavaşi
Özcan Yavaşi
EUErden Erol Unluer
Erden Erol Unluer
We wished to compare the San Francisco Syncope Rule (SFSR), Evaluation of Guidelines in Syncope Study (EGSYS) and the Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sincope nel Lazio (OESIL) risk scores and to assess their efficacy in recognising patients with syncope at high risk for short-term adverse events (death, the need for major therapeutic procedures, and early readmission to the hospital). We also wanted to test those variables to designate a local risk score, the Anatolian Syncope Rule (ASR).