Ashlynn Stillwell

Dr. Ashlynn Stillwell

2521 Hydrosystems Lab Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 205 N. Mathews Urbana Illinois 61801 IL, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2011 in Ecology and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAshlynn Stillwell
Ashlynn Stillwell
CKCarey W. King
Carey W. King
MWMichael E. Webber
Michael E. Webber
IDIan J. Duncan
Ian J. Duncan
AHAmy Hardberger
Amy Hardberger
Stillwell, A. S., C. W. King, M. E. Webber, I. J. Duncan, and A. Hardberger. 2011. The energy-water nexus in Texas. Ecology and Society 16(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03781-160102

5 April 2010 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAshlynn Stillwell
Ashlynn Stillwell
DHDavid C. Hoppock
David C. Hoppock
MWMichael Webber
Michael Webber
This manuscript uses data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to analyze the potential for energy recovery from wastewater treatment plants via anaerobic digestion with biogas utilization and biosolids incineration with electricity generation. These energy recovery strategies could help offset the electricity consumption of the wastewater sector and represent possible areas for sustainable energy policy implementation. We estimate that anaerobic digestion could save 628 to 4,940 million kWh annually in the United States. In Texas, anaerobic digestion could save 40.2 to 460 million kWh annually and biosolids incineration could save 51.9 to 1,030 million kWh annually.

1 January 2016 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TDTyler A. DeNooyer
Tyler A. DeNooyer
JPJoshua M. Peschel
Joshua M. Peschel
ZZZhenxing Zhang
Zhenxing Zhang
ASAshlynn Stillwell
Ashlynn Stillwell

12 March 2018 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCChristopher Chini
Christopher Chini
ASAshlynn Stillwell
Ashlynn Stillwell
Data on urban water resources are scarce, despite a majority of the U.S. population residing in urban environments. Further, information on the energy required to facilitate the treatment, distribution, and collection of urban water are even more limited. In this study, we evaluate the energy‐for‐water component of the energy‐water nexus by providing and analyzing a unique primary database consisting of drinking water and wastewater utility flows and energy. These anthropogenic fluxes of water through the urban environment are used to assess the state of the U.S. urban energy‐water nexus at over 160 utilities. The average daily per person water flux is estimated at 560 L of drinking water and 500 L of wastewater. Drinking water and wastewater utilities require 340 kWh/1,000 m3 and 430 kWh/1,000 m3 of energy, respectively, to treat these resources. The total national energy demand for water utilities accounts for 1.0% of the total annual electricity consumption of the United States. Additionally, the water and embedded energy loss associated with non‐revenue water accounts for 9.1 × 109 m3 of water and 3,100 GWh, enough electricity to power 300,000 U.S. households annually. Finally, the water flux and embedded energy fluctuated monthly in many cities. As the nation's water resources become increasingly scarce and unpredictable, it is essential to have a set of empirical data for continuous evaluation and updates on the state of the U.S. urban energy‐water nexus.

17 December 2022 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Filippo MazzoniFilippo Mazzoni
Filippo Mazzoni
Stefano AlvisiStefano Alvisi
Stefano Alvisi
Mirjam BlokkerMirjam Blokker
Mirjam Blokker
SBSteven G. Buchberger
Steven G. Buchberger
ACAndrea Castelletti
Andrea Castelletti
MFMarco Franchini
Marco Franchini

12 January 2017 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCChristopher Chini
Christopher Chini
JCJames Canning
James Canning
KSKelsey L. Schreiber
Kelsey L. Schreiber
JPJoshua Peschel
Joshua Peschel
ASAshlynn Stillwell
Ashlynn Stillwell
Green infrastructure is a unique combination of economic, social, and environmental goals and benefits that requires an adaptable framework for planning, implementing, and evaluating. In this study, we propose an experimental framework for policy, implementation, and subsequent evaluation of green stormwater infrastructure within the context of sociotechnical systems and urban experimentation. Sociotechnical systems describe the interaction of complex systems with quantitative and qualitative impacts. Urban experimentation—traditionally referencing climate change programs and their impacts—is a process of evaluating city programs as if in a laboratory setting with hypotheses and evaluated results. We combine these two concepts into a singular framework creating a policy feedback cycle (PFC) for green infrastructure to evaluate municipal green infrastructure plans as an experimental process within the context of a sociotechnical system. After proposing and discussing the PFC, we utilize the tool to research and evaluate the green infrastructure programs of 27 municipalities across the United States. Results indicate that green infrastructure plans should incorporate community involvement and communication, evaluation based on project motivation, and an iterative process for knowledge production. We suggest knowledge brokers as a key resource in connecting the evaluation stage of the feedback cycle to the policy phase. We identify three important needs for green infrastructure experimentation: (i) a fluid definition of green infrastructure in policy; (ii) maintenance and evaluation components of a green infrastructure plan; and (iii) communication of the plan to the community.