Circulating tumour cells (CTC) in the blood have been accepted as a prognostic marker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Only limited data exist on the prognostic impact of CTC in patients with early stage CRC using standardised detection assays. The aim of this study was to elucidate the role of CTC in patients with non-metastatic CRC. A total of 287 patients with potentially curable CRC were enrolled, including 239 patients with UICC stage I–III. CTC were measured in the blood using the CellSearch system preoperatively and on postoperative days 3 and 7. The complete patient group (UICC I–IV) and the non-metastatic cohort (UICC I–III) were analysed independently. Patients were followed for 28 (0–53) months. Prognostic factors for overall and progression-free survival were analysed using univariate and multivariate analyses. CTC were detected more frequently in patients with metastatic disease. No clinicopathological variables were associated with CTC detection in non-metastatic patients. CTC detection (1 CTC per 7.5 ml blood) in the blood was significantly associated with worse overall survival (49.8 vs 38.4 months; P<0.001) in the non-metastatic group (UICC I–III), as well as in the complete cohort (48.4 vs 33.6 months; P<0.001). On multivariate analysis CTC were the strongest prognostic factor in non-metastatic patients (hazard ratio (HR) 5.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3–13.6) as well as in the entire study group (HR 5.6; 95% CI 2.6–12.0). Preoperative CTC detection is a strong and independent prognostic marker in non-metastatic CRC.

The skills, knowledge and resources to search for, find, understand, evaluate and apply health information is defined as health literacy (HL). If individuals want to use health information from the Internet, they need Digital Health Literacy (eHL), which in addition to HL also includes, for example, media literacy. If information cannot be found or understood by patients due to low (e)HL, patients will not have the opportunity to make informed decisions. In addition, many health apps for self-management or prevention also require (e)HL. Thus, it follows that active participation in healthcare, in terms of Person-Centered Care (PCC) is only possible through (e)HL. Currently, there is a great need to strengthen these competencies in society to achieve increased empowerment of patients and their health. However, at the same time, there is a need to train and improve competencies in the field of healthcare professionals so that they can counsel and guide patients. This article provides an overview with a focus on HL and eHL in healthcare, shows the opportunities to adapt services and describes the possible handling of patients with low (e)HL. In addition, the opportunities for patients and healthcare professionals to improve (e)HL are highlighted.

Impact of mobile health and medical applications on clinical practice in gastroenterology

The COVID-19 pandemic has tremendously changed private and professional interactions and behaviors worldwide. The effects of this pandemic and the actions taken have changed our healthcare systems, which consequently has affected medical education and surgical training. In the face of constant disruptions of surgical education and training during this pandemic outbreak, structured and innovative concepts and adapted educational curricula are important to ensure a high quality of medical treatment. While efforts were undertaken to prevent viral spreading, it is important to analyze and assess the effects of this crisis on medical education, surgical training and teaching at large and certainly in the field of surgical oncology. Against this background, in this paper we introduce practical and creative recommendations for the continuity of students’ and residents’ medical and surgical training and teaching. This includes virtual educational curricula, skills development classes, video-based feedback and simulation in the specialty field of surgical oncology. In conclusion, the effects of COVID 19 on Surgical Training and Teaching, certainly in the field of Surgical Oncology, are challenging.

Purpose: Clinical abundance of artificial intelligence has increased significantly in the last decade. This survey aims to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge and acceptance of AI applications among surgeons in Germany.Methods: A total of 357 surgeons from German university hospitals, academic teaching hospitals and private practices were contacted by e-mail and asked to participate in the anonymous survey.Results: A total of 147 physicians completed the survey. The majority of respondents (n = 85, 52.8%) stated that they were familiar with AI applications in medicine. Personal knowledge was self-rated as average (n = 67, 41.6%) or rudimentary (n = 60, 37.3%) by the majority of participants. On the basis of various application scenarios, it became apparent that the respondents have different demands on AI applications in the area of “diagnosis confirmation” as compared to the area of “therapy decision.” For the latter category, the requirements in terms of the error level are significantly higher and more respondents view their application in medical practice rather critically. Accordingly, most of the participants hope that AI systems will primarily improve diagnosis confirmation, while they see their ethical and legal problems with regard to liability as the main obstacle to extensive clinical application.Conclusion: German surgeons are in principle positively disposed toward AI applications. However, many surgeons see a deficit in their own knowledge and in the implementation of AI applications in their own professional environment. Accordingly, medical education programs targeting both medical students and healthcare professionals should convey basic knowledge about the development and clinical implementation process of AI applications in different medical fields, including surgery.

Partial hepatectomy remains the most effective therapeutic modality for patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Within a multimodal setting, partial hepatectomy may result in 10-year survival rates of as high as 24%.¹ However, after curative resection, as many as 70% of patients develop hepatic or extrahepatic disease recurrence.^2,3 Although approximately one-quarter of patients with intrahepatic recurrence may undergo repeated hepatectomy, most patients with disease recurrence after potentially curative partial hepatectomy for CRLM are candidates for palliative therapy only.⁴