To assess the risk factors, antibiotic therapy and outcomes of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (MDRGNB) bacteraemia in hospitalized patients with cancer. Episodes of MDRGNB bacteraemia were compared with a susceptible control group in a 4 year prospective study. Of 747 bacteraemias, 372 (49.7%) were caused by a Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Fifty-one of these (13.7%) were caused by a multidrug-resistant (MDR) strain. Previous antibiotics [odds ratio (OR) 3.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63–7.80] and urinary catheter (OR 2.41; 95% CI 1.01–5.74) were identified as independent risk factors for MDRGNB acquisition. The most frequent mechanism of resistance was extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production (45%), mainly by Escherichia coli, followed by Amp-C cephalosporinase hyperproduction (24%). Patients with MDRGNB bacteraemia more frequently received inadequate initial antibiotic therapy (69% versus 9%; P < 0.001) and time to adequate therapy was longer in this group (41% versus 4%; P < 0.001). Patients in the resistant group more frequently required intensive care unit (ICU) admission (14% versus 5%; P = 0.023), had greater need for mechanical ventilation (14% versus 3%; P = 0.005) and had a higher overall case-fatality rate (41% versus 21%; P = 0.003). Risk factors for mortality were solid tumour (OR 5.04; 95% CI 2.49–10.19), current corticosteroid use (OR 4.38; 95% CI 2.39–8.05), ICU admission (OR 11.40; 95% CI 3.19–40.74) and MDRGNB bacteraemia (OR 3.52; 95% CI 1.36–9.09). MDRGNB bacteraemia was common among cancer patients, especially in those exposed to antibiotics and urinary catheter. The most frequent mechanism of resistance was ESBL production. Patients with MDRGNB more frequently received inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy and presented poorer outcomes with a higher overall case-fatality rate (within 30 days).

To assess the clinical features, risk factors, molecular epidemiology and outcome of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) bacteraemia in hospitalized cancer patients. Episodes of ESBL-EC bacteraemia were compared with a susceptible control group in a 3 year prospective study. ESBL-EC strains were studied by PCR and isoelectric focusing, and molecular typing was performed by PFGE. Out of 531 episodes of bacteraemia, 135 were caused by E. coli. Seventeen of these cases involved ESBL-EC-producing strains (12.6%). In the multivariate analysis, female gender [odds ratio (OR) 3.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–11.4] and previous antibiotic therapy (OR 3.22; 95% CI 1.00–10.3) were found to be independent risk factors for ESBL acquisition. An analysis of ESBL-EC isolates revealed a polyclonal distribution with CTX-M predominance (59%). Patients with ESBL-EC bacteraemia were more likely to have received an inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy (65% versus 6%; P = 0.000), and the time to adequate therapy was longer in this group (0 versus 1.50 days; P = 0.000). The overall mortality rate was 22%, ranging from 20% to 35% (P = 0.20). Risk factors for mortality were solid tumour (OR 19.41; 95% CI 4.66–80.83), corticosteroid therapy (OR 3.04 95% CI 1.05–8.81) and intensive care unit admission (OR 248.24, 95% CI 18.49–3332.14). In neutropenic patients, ESBL-EC bacteraemia was associated with poorer outcome and a higher overall mortality rate (37.5% versus 6.5%; P = 0.01). In our centre, ESBL-EC bacteraemia is frequent among cancer patients, especially in those exposed to antibiotic pressure. All ESBL-EC strains were unrelated and most of them carried a CTX-M group enzyme. Patients with ESBL-EC bacteraemia received inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy more frequently than patients carrying a susceptible strain, but significant differences in mortality could not be demonstrated.

Sepsis is a frequent complication in immunosuppressed cancer patients and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients that is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The worldwide emergence of antimicrobial resistance is of special concern in this population because any delay in starting adequate empirical antibiotic therapy can lead to poor outcomes. In this review, we aim to address: (1) the mechanisms involved in the development of sepsis and septic shock in these patients; (2) the risk factors associated with a worse prognosis; (3) the impact of adequate initial empirical antibiotic therapy given the current era of widespread antimicrobial resistance; and (4) the optimal management of sepsis, including adequate and early source control of infection, optimized antibiotic use based on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics changes in these patients, and the role of the new available antibiotics.

Confinement during the COVID‐19 pandemic is expected to have a serious and complex impact on the mental health of patients with an eating disorder (ED) and of patients with obesity. The present manuscript has the following aims: (1) to analyse the psychometric properties of the COVID Isolation Eating Scale (CIES), (2) to explore changes that occurred due to confinement in eating symptomatology; and (3) to explore the general acceptation of the use of telemedicine during confinement. The sample comprised 121 participants (87 ED patients and 34 patients with obesity) recruited from six different centres. Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) tested the rational‐theoretical structure of the CIES. Adequate goodness‐of‐fit was obtained for the confirmatory factor analysis, and Cronbach alpha values ranged from good to excellent. Regarding the effects of confinement, positive and negative impacts of the confinement depends of the eating disorder subtype. Patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and with obesity endorsed a positive response to treatment during confinement, no significant changes were found in bulimia nervosa (BN) patients, whereas Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder (OSFED) patients endorsed an increase in eating symptomatology and in psychopathology. Furthermore, AN patients expressed the greatest dissatisfaction and accommodation difficulty with remote therapy when compared with the previously provided face‐to‐face therapy. The present study provides empirical evidence on the psychometric robustness of the CIES tool and shows that a negative confinement impact was associated with ED subtype, whereas OSFED patients showed the highest impairment in eating symptomatology and in psychopathology.