Steven David

Dr. Steven David


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 August 2019 in Breast Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ANAadya Nagpal
Aadya Nagpal
RRRichard P. Redvers
Richard P. Redvers
XLXiawei Ling
Xiawei Ling
SAScott Ayton
Scott Ayton
MFMiriam Fuentes
Miriam Fuentes
NPNormand Pouliot
Normand Pouliot
Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-targeted therapies prolong survival in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Benefit stems primarily from improved control of systemic disease, but up to 50% of patients progress to incurable brain metastases due to acquired resistance and/or limited permeability of inhibitors across the blood-brain barrier. Neratinib, a potent irreversible pan-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, prolongs disease-free survival in the extended adjuvant setting, and several trials evaluating its efficacy alone or combination with other inhibitors in early and advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients are ongoing. However, its efficacy as a first-line therapy against HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis has not been fully explored, in part due to the lack of relevant pre-clinical models that faithfully recapitulate this disease. Here, we describe the development and characterisation of a novel syngeneic model of spontaneous HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis (TBCP-1) and its use to evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of action of neratinib. TBCP-1 cells were derived from a spontaneous BALB/C mouse mammary tumour and characterised for hormone receptors and HER2 expression by flow cytometry, immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry. Neratinib was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in the metastatic and neoadjuvant setting. Its mechanism of action was examined by transcriptomic profiling, function inhibition assays and immunoblotting. TBCP-1 cells naturally express high levels of HER2 but lack expression of hormone receptors. TBCP-1 tumours maintain a HER2-positive phenotype in vivo and give rise to a high incidence of spontaneous and experimental metastases in the brain and other organs. Cell proliferation/viability in vitro is inhibited by neratinib and by other HER2 inhibitors, but not by anti-oestrogens, indicating phenotypic and functional similarities to human HER2-positive breast cancer. Mechanistically, neratinib promotes a non-apoptotic form of cell death termed ferroptosis. Importantly, metastasis assays demonstrate that neratinib potently inhibits tumour growth and metastasis, including to the brain, and prolongs survival, particularly when used as a neoadjuvant therapy. The TBCP-1 model recapitulates the spontaneous spread of HER2-positive breast cancer to the brain seen in patients and provides a unique tool to identify novel therapeutics and biomarkers. Neratinib-induced ferroptosis provides new opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Further evaluation of neratinib neoadjuvant therapy is warranted.

1 February 2020 in The Breast
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SDSteven David
Steven David
JTJennifer Tan
Jennifer Tan
PSPeter Savas
Peter Savas
MBMathias Bressel
Mathias Bressel
DKDianne Kelly
Dianne Kelly
SSShankar Siva
Shankar Siva
Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an emerging noninvasive approach for the treatment of oligometastases. Limited prospective evidence is available in breast cancer. To determine the safety and feasibility of single fraction SABR for patients with bone only oligometastatic breast cancer. Secondary endpoints were local and distant progression-free survival (LPFS and DPFS), toxicity and response assessment. In this single institution prospective trial we screened patients with computed tomography, bone scan, and sodium fluoride positron emission tomography. Eligible patients had one to three bone only oligometastases. All patients were treated at a dose of 20Gy in 1 fraction to each metastasis. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to determine local and distant progression free survival (LPFS and DPFS). Toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event version 4.0. 15 eligible patients were recruited to the study. Median follow-up time was 24 months. The treatment was feasible in 12 (80%) of patients with 3 (20%) of patients having treatment delayed by more than 3 days. 10 (67%) of patients experienced grade 1 treatment related toxicity, 4 (27%) experienced grade 2 toxicity and no patients experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment related toxicity. The two-year LPFS was 100%, DPFS was 67%. We observed that SABR is feasible, well tolerated and effective in this cohort with two thirds of patients disease-free at two years. In selected patients with bone-only oligometastatic disease, SABR could be considered a treatment option. Randomised trials are required to assess the impact of SABR on overall survival when compared to the standard of care.

1 January 2021 in Translational Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SDSteven David
Steven David
GHGwo Yaw Ho
Gwo Yaw Ho
DDDaphne Day
Daphne Day
MHMarion Harris
Marion Harris
JTJennifer Tan
Jennifer Tan
MWMichelle White
Michelle White
Current first-line systemic treatment in most patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER-2 negative breast cancer is an aromatase inhibitor in combination with a cyclin dependant kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor. Frequently, these patients require palliative radiotherapy (RT) for symptomatic disease management. There is a paucity of data on the safety of combining a CDK 4/6 inhibitor with palliative RT, with conflicting case reports in the literature. We report on 5 cases at our institution where enhanced radiotherapy toxicity was observed when palliative doses of RT was delivered during or prior to treatment with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor. After review of pre-clinical and mechanistic data, we hypothesise that the effects of CDK4/6 inhibition on normal tissue and the tumour microenvironment may impede tissue recovery and exacerbate acute radiation and radiation recall toxicities. Further studies are required to clarify the potential toxicities of this combination. Clinicians should consider the potential risks when combining CDK 4/6 inhibitors with palliative RT and individualise patient management accordingly.

23 March 2021 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RAReem Alomran
Reem Alomran
MWMichelle White
Michelle White
MBMelissa Bruce
Melissa Bruce
MBMathias Bressel
Mathias Bressel
SRSusan Roache
Susan Roache
SDSteven David
Steven David
Background: The enhanced knowledge of cancer biology has led to considerable advancement in systemic therapy for advanced breast cancer. Recently, studies showed that cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, when added to endocrine therapy, had improved the outcomes of patients with advanced ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. However, the disease often progresses following a period of treatment response. In a subset of patients, disease progression may occur at limited sites, i.e., oligoprogressive disease (OPD). In the past few years, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for advanced cancer when delivered to limited metastatic sites. Hence, it is worth investigating the role of SRT in the setting of oligoprogressive breast cancer. Method: AVATAR is a multicentre phase II registry trial of SRT with endocrine therapy and CDK 4/6 inhibitor for the management of advanced ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. The study aims to enrol 32 patients with OPD limited to 5 lesions. The primary endpoint of the study is time to change systemic therapy measured from the commencement of SRT to change in systemic therapy. Secondary objectives include overall survival, progression free survival and treatment related toxicity. The exploratory objective is to describe the time to change in systemic therapy by the site (bone only vs. non-bone lesions) and number (1 vs. > 1) of OPD. Discussion: This study aims to explore the effect of SRT in maximising the benefit of systemic therapy in patients with oligoprogressive ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. This approach might help reduce the burden of disease and improve the life quality in these patients. Trial registration: ACTRN, ACTRN12620001212943. Date of registration 16 November 2020- Retrospectively registered.

31 March 2022 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSteven David
Steven David
JTJennifer Tan
Jennifer Tan
SSSiva Shankar
Siva Shankar
LKLama Karroum
Lama Karroum
PSPeter Savas
Peter Savas
SLSherene Loi
Sherene Loi
The role of radiotherapy and immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is of emerging interest in many solid tumours, including breast cancer. There is increasing evidence that the host’s immune system plays an important role in influencing the response to treatment and prognosis in breast cancer. Several pre-clinical studies and clinical trials have reported on the ‘abscopal effect—regression of distant untreated tumour sites, mediated by an immunological response following ionizing radiation to a targeted tumour site. Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive technique used to augment various immune responses with an ablative tumoricidal dose when compared to conventional radiotherapy. SABR is characterized by typically 1–5 precision radiotherapy treatments that simultaneously deliver a high dose, whilst sparing normal tissues. Following SABR, there is evidence of systemic immune activation in patients with increased PD1 expression on CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. Studies continue to focus on metastatic triple-negative disease, a highly immunogenic subtype of breast cancer with poor prognosis. In this review, we discuss the immunological effect of SABR, alone and in combination with immunotherapy, and the importance of dose and fractionation. We also propose future strategies for treating oligometastatic disease, where this approach may be most useful for producing durable responses.

1 March 2025 in JCO Oncology Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDSteven David
Steven David
ECEmma Connolly
Emma Connolly
MBMathias Bressel
Mathias Bressel
JTJennifer Tan
Jennifer Tan
GHGerard G. Hanna
Gerard G. Hanna
MWMichelle White
Michelle White
PURPOSE: AVATAR (trial registration: ACTRN 12620001212943) is a multicenter phase II single-arm trial to evaluate whether stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for oligoprogressive estrogen receptor (ER)–positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative breast cancer can delay a change from combination cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and an aromatase inhibitor (AI) to next-line systemic therapy. METHODS: Patients received SABR to all sites of oligoprogressive disease while continuing CDK 4/6i and AI therapy. SABR was permitted for further oligoprogression without altering systemic therapy. The primary end point was event-free survival defined as the time from SABR to either (1) a change in systemic therapy, (2) any progression within 6 months, or (3) the appearance of >3 new progressing lesions. A key secondary end point was modified progression-free survival (mPFS), defined as oligoprogression not amenable to further SABR, or death due to any cause. RESULTS: Thirty-two eligible patients were recruited between August 2020 and November 2022, with a median follow-up of 24 months. The primary end point was met, with 47% (95% CI, 29 to 63) of patients remaining event-free for ≥6 months. The median mPFS was 9.9 months (95% CI, 4.1 to not reached), with an estimated 44% (95% CI, 26 to 60) and 36% (95% CI, 20 to 53) of patients maintaining systemic therapy unchanged for 12 and 24 months, respectively. Median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.1 to 6.8), with 11 (34%) and two (6%) of patients receiving second and third courses of SABR, respectively. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: In patients with oligoprogressive ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, these findings suggest that SABR is a viable strategy to maintain treatment with CDK 4/6i in lieu of a change in systemic therapy.