Otgonbaatar C, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2022 Sep;23:e68. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2022.0127

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) image quality and blooming artifacts from coronary artery stents in comparison to conventional methods, including hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR). Methods: A retrospective analysis included 66 CCTA patients from July to November 2022. Major coronary arteries were evaluated for image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Stent sharpness was quantified using 10%-90% edge rise slope (ERS) and 10%-90% edge rise distance (ERD). Qualitative analysis employed a 5-point scoring system to assess overall image quality, image noise, vessel wall, and stent structure. Results: SR-DLR demonstrated significantly lower image noise compared to HIR and DLR. SNR and CNR were notably higher in SR-DLR. Stent ERS was significantly improved in SR-DLR, with mean ERD values of 0.70 ± 0.20 mm for SR-DLR, 1.13 ± 0.28 mm for HIR, and 0.85 ± 0.26 mm for DLR. Qualitatively, SR-DLR scored higher in all categories. Conclusions: SR-DLR produces images with lower image noise, leading to improved overall image quality, compared with HIR and DLR. SR-DLR is a valuable image reconstruction algorithm for enhancing the spatial resolution and sharpness of coronary artery stents without being constrained by hardware limitations. Advances in knowledge: The overall image quality was significantly higher in SR-DLR, resulting in sharper coronary artery stents compared to HIR and DLR.

Background: The demand for homogeneous and higher vascular contrast enhancement is critical to provide an appropriate interpretation of abnormal vascular findings in coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Purpose: To evaluate the effect of various contrast media concentrations (Iohexol-370, Iohexol-300, Iohexol-240) and image reconstructions (filtered back projection [FBP], hybrid iterative reconstruction [IR], and deep learning reconstruction [DLR]) on coronary CTA. Material and Methods: A total of 63 patients referred for coronary CTA between July and October 2021 were enrolled in this prospective study, and they randomly received one of three contrast media. CTA images were reconstructed with FBP, hybrid IR, and DLR. The CT attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for all three images. The images were subjectively evaluated by two radiologists in terms of overall image quality, artifacts, image noise, and vessel wall delineation on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: The application of DLR resulted in significantly lower image noise; higher CT attenuation, SNR, and CNR; and better subjective analysis among the three different concentrations of contrast media groups ( P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the CT attenuation of the left ventricle ( P = 0.089) and coronary arteries ( P = 0.072) between hybrid IR at Iohexol-300 and DLR at Iohexol-240. Furthermore, application of DLR to the Iohexol-240 significantly improved SNR and CNR; it achieved higher subjective scores compared with hybrid IR at Iohexol-300 ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: We suggest that using DLR with Iohexol-240 contrast media is preferable to hybrid IR with Iohexol-300 contrast media in coronary CTA.

This study aimed to investigate the potential of contrast enhancement (CE)-boost technique in the head and neck computed tomography (CT) angiography in terms of the objective and subjective image quality. Consecutive patients who underwent head and neck CT angiography between May 2022 and July 2022 were included. The CE-boost images were generated by combining the subtracted iodinated image and contrast-enhanced image. The objective image analysis was compared for each image with and without CE-boost technique using the CT attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), and image sharpness (full width at half width maximum, FWHM). The subjective image analysis was evaluated by two independent experienced radiologists in the following aspects: the overall image quality, motion artifact, vascular delineation, and vessel sharpness. A total of 65 patients (mean age, 59.48 ± 13.71 years; range, 24–87 years; 36 women) were included. The CT attenuation of the vertebrobasilar arteries was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the images obtained using CE-boost technique than in conventional images. Image noise was significantly (p < 0.001) lower for CE-boost images (6.09 ± 1.93) than for conventional images (7.79 ± 1.73). Moreover, CE-boost technique yielded higher SNR (64.43 ± 17.17 vs. 121.37 ± 38.77, p < 0.001) and CNR (56.90 ± 18.79 vs. 116.65 ± 57.44, p < 0.001) than conventional images. CE-boost resulted in shorter FWHM than conventional images (p < 0.001). Higher subjective image quality scores were also demonstrated by the CE-boost than images without CE-boost technique. In both objective and subjective image analysis, the CE-boost technique provided higher image quality without increasing the flow rate and concentration of contrast media in the head and neck CT angiography. Furthermore, the vessel completeness and delineation were superior in CE-boost images than in conventional images.

Background: The reference protocol for the quantification of coronary artery calcium (CAC) should be updated to meet the standards of modern imaging techniques. Purpose: To assess the influence of filtered-back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR), and three levels of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on CAC quantification on both in vitro and in vivo studies. Material and Methods: In vitro study was performed with a multipurpose anthropomorphic chest phantom and small pieces of bones. The real volume of each piece was measured using the water displacement method. In the in vivo study, 100 patients (84 men; mean age = 71.2 ± 8.7 years) underwent CAC scoring with a tube voltage of 120 kVp and image thickness of 3 mm. The image reconstruction was done with FBP, hybrid IR, and three levels of DLR including mild (DLR_mild), standard (DLR_std), and strong (DLR_str). Results: In the in vitro study, the calcium volume was equivalent ( P = 0.949) among FBP, hybrid IR, DLR_mild, DLR_std, and DLR_str. In the in vivo study, the image noise was significantly lower in images that used DLR_str-based reconstruction, when compared images other reconstructions ( P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the calcium volume ( P = 0.987) and Agatston score ( P = 0.991) among FBP, hybrid IR, DLR_mild, DLR_std, and DLR_str. The highest overall agreement of Agatston scores was found in the DLR groups (98%) and hybrid IR (95%) when compared to standard FBP reconstruction. Conclusion: The DLR_str presented the lowest bias of agreement in the Agatston scores and is recommended for the accurate quantification of CAC.

To investigate the usefulness of super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) with cardiac option in the assessment of image quality in patients with stent-assisted coil embolization, coil embolization, and flow-diverting stent placement compared with other image reconstructions. This single-centre retrospective study included 50 patients (mean age, 59 years; range, 44-81 years; 13 men) who were treated with stent-assisted coil embolization, coil embolization, and flow-diverting stent placement between January and July 2023. The images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR), and SR-DLR. The objective image analysis included image noise in the Hounsfield unit (HU), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and full width at half maximum (FWHM). Subjectively, two radiologists evaluated the overall image quality for the visualization of the flow-diverting stent, coil, and stent. The image noise in HU in SR-DLR was 6.99 ± 1.49, which was significantly lower than that in images reconstructed with FBP (12.32 ± 3.01) and hybrid IR (8.63 ± 2.12) (P < .001). Both the mean SNR and CNR were significantly higher in SR-DLR than in FBP and hybrid IR (P < .001 and P < .001). The FWHMs for the stent (P < .004), flow-diverting stent (P < .001), and coil (P < .001) were significantly lower in SR-DLR than in FBP and hybrid IR. The subjective visual scores were significantly higher in SR-DLR than in other image reconstructions (P < .001). SR-DLR with cardiac option is useful for follow-up imaging in stent-assisted coil embolization and flow-diverting stent placement in terms of lower image noise, higher SNR and CNR, superior subjective image analysis, and less blooming artifact than other image reconstructions. SR-DLR with cardiac option allows better visualization of the peripheral and smaller cerebral arteries. SR-DLR with cardiac option can be beneficial for CT imaging of stent-assisted coil embolization and flow-diverting stent.