Akiko Abe

Dr. Akiko Abe

The Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2023 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAtsushi Fusegi
Atsushi Fusegi
HKHiroyuki Kanao
Hiroyuki Kanao
STShiho Tsumura
Shiho Tsumura
AMAtsushi Murakami
Atsushi Murakami
AAAkiko Abe
Akiko Abe
HNHidetaka Nomura
Hidetaka Nomura
Fusegi A, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Nov;34(1):e5. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e5

25 February 2022 in International Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAkiko Abe
Akiko Abe
MYMasao Yuasa
Masao Yuasa
YIYoshie Imai
Yoshie Imai
TKTomohiro Kagawa
Tomohiro Kagawa
AMAyuka Mineda
Ayuka Mineda
TITakeshi Iwasa
Takeshi Iwasa

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAkiko Abe
Akiko Abe
IIIssei Imoto
Issei Imoto
AUArisa Ueki
Arisa Ueki
HNHidetaka Nomura
Hidetaka Nomura
HKHiroyuki Kanao
Hiroyuki Kanao
Approximately 20% of cases of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are hereditary, sharing many causative genes with breast cancer. The lower frequency of EOC compared to breast cancer makes it challenging to estimate absolute or relative risk and verify the efficacy of risk-reducing surgery in individuals harboring germline pathogenic variants (GPV) in EOC predisposition genes, particularly those with relatively low penetrance. Here, we review the molecular features and hereditary tumor risk associated with several moderate-penetrance genes in EOC that are involved in the homologous recombination repair pathway, i.e., ATM, BRIP1, NBN, PALB2, and RAD51C/D. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the expression and function of these genes may elucidate trends in the development and progression of hereditary tumors, including EOC. A fundamental understanding of the genes driving EOC can help us accurately estimate the genetic risk of developing EOC and select appropriate prevention and treatment strategies for hereditary EOC. Therefore, we summarize the functions of the candidate predisposition genes for EOC and discuss the clinical management of individuals carrying GPV in these genes.

1 January 2025 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMayumi Kamata
Mayumi Kamata
AFAtsushi Fusegi
Atsushi Fusegi
NKNozomi Kurihara
Nozomi Kurihara
AAAkiko Abe
Akiko Abe
HNHidetaka Nomura
Hidetaka Nomura
HKHiroyuki Kanao
Hiroyuki Kanao
Kamata M, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Jul;36:e22. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e22

28 February 2013 in Acta Cytologica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAkiko Abe
Akiko Abe
YSYuko Sugiyama
Yuko Sugiyama
RFReiko Furuta
Reiko Furuta
NFNoriyuki Furuta
Noriyuki Furuta
MMMaki Matoda
Maki Matoda
NTNobuhiro Takeshima
Nobuhiro Takeshima
Objective: This study retrospectively investigated the usefulness of intraoperative diagnosis based on imprint cytology and frozen sections for ovarian germ cell tumor. Study Design: Intraoperative studies were reviewed for 23 cases with ovarian germ cell tumor treatment for which both frozen sections and imprint cytology were available. Final histopathologic diagnoses were compared with those based on intraoperative examinations. Results: Underlying pathologies included dysgerminoma (n = 6), yolk sac tumor (n = 1), non-gestational choriocarcinoma (n = 1), mature cystic teratoma with malignant transformation (n = 1), immature teratoma (n = 11), and mixed germ cell tumor (n = 3). Discrepancies between intraoperative imprint cytology and definitive histologic diagnosis were seen in 6 of the 23 cases. Accuracy was 54.5% (6/11) for immature teratoma and 91.7% (11/12) for other tumors. Cytologic examination facilitated accurate diagnosis in both of our cases, and intraoperative diagnosis by frozen section proved inaccurate. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that intraoperative assessment based on imprint cytology for immature teratoma has a relatively lower sensitivity, but an acceptable sensitivity for other germ cell tumors. Diagnostic approaches combining frozen sections and imprint cytology are advisable to improve the yield for intraoperative diagnosis.

18 June 2022 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAkiko Abe
Akiko Abe
IIIssei Imoto
Issei Imoto
STShoichiro Tange
Shoichiro Tange
MNMasato Nishimura
Masato Nishimura
TITakeshi Iwasa
Takeshi Iwasa
The prevalence of germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1/2-PV) in patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) in a rural area of Japan and their association with clinical characteristics, including treatment response and survival outcome, were investigated. A total of 123 unbiased patients with OC were tested for gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 using next-generation sequencing-based targeted amplicon sequencing. Clinical characteristics of OC patients with and without gBRCA1/2 status were compared. The overall prevalence of gBRCA1/2-PV was 15.4% (19 cases), with gBRCA2-PV (10.5%, 13 cases) being more common than gBRCA1-PV (4.9%, 6 cases). Among the observed gBRCA1/2-PV, several novel variants were included, suggesting that gBRCA1/2-PV unique to the local area exist. gBRCA1/2-PV was significantly more prevalent in OC patients at an older age, with high-grade serous carcinoma, with advanced-stage tumors, and with a family history of breast cancer or hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC)-associated cancers. Patients with advanced-stage OC with gBRCA1/2-PV showed a significantly lower recurrence rate and tended to have better progression-free and overall survival than those with wild-type gBRCA1/2. Genetic testing for gBRCA1/2 status in all OC patients is useful not only for diagnosing HBOC in patients and their relatives to assess the risk of HBOC-associated cancers, but also to estimate therapy response and outcomes in patients.