David Dawson

Dr. David Dawson

School of Civil Engineering; University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2014 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KRKaty Roelich
Katy Roelich
DDDavid Dawson
David Dawson
PPPhil Purnell
Phil Purnell
CKChristof Knoeri
Christof Knoeri
RRRuairi Revell
Ruairi Revell
JSJulia K. Steinberger
Julia K. Steinberger
Decarbonisation of existing infrastructure systems requires a dynamic roll-out of technology at an unprecedented scale. The potential disruption in supply of critical materials could endanger such a transition to low-carbon infrastructure and, by extension, compromise energy security more broadly because low carbon technologies are reliant on these materials in a way that fossil-fuelled energy infrastructure is not. Criticality is currently defined as the combination of the potential for supply disruption and the exposure of a system of interest to that disruption. We build on this definition and develop a dynamic approach to quantifying criticality, which monitors the change in criticality during the transition towards a low-carbon infrastructure goal. This allows us to assess the relative risk of different technology pathways to reach a particular goal and reduce the probability of being ‘locked in’ to currently attractive but potentially future-critical technologies. To demonstrate, we apply our method to criticality of the proposed UK electricity system transition, with a focus on neodymium. We anticipate that the supply disruption potential of neodymium will decrease by almost 30% by 2050; however, our results show the criticality of low carbon electricity production increases ninefold over this period, as a result of increasing exposure to neodymium-reliant technologies

1 February 2016 in Journal of Transport Geography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DDDavid Dawson
David Dawson
JSJon Shaw
Jon Shaw
WGW. Roland Gehrels
W. Roland Gehrels
Future climate change is likely to increase the frequency of coastal storms and floods, with major consequences for coastal transport infrastructure. This paper assesses the extent to which projected sea-level rise is likely to impact upon the functioning of the Dawlish to Teignmouth stretch of the London to Penzance railway line, in England. Using a semi-empirical modelling approach, we identify a relationship between sea-level change and rail incidents over the last 150years and then use model-based sea-level predictions to extrapolate this relationship into the future. We find that days with line restrictions (DLRs) look set to increase by up to 1170%, to as many as 84–120 per year, by 2100 in a high sea-level rise scenario (0.55–0.81m). Increased costs to the railway industry deriving from maintenance and line restrictions will be small (£ millions) in comparison with damage caused by individual extreme events (£10s of millions), while the costs of diversion of the railway are higher still (£100s of millions to billions). Socio-economic costs to the region are likely to be significant although they are more difficult to estimate accurately. Finally, we explain how our methodology is applicable to vulnerable coastal transport infrastructure worldwide

11 December 2013 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJonathan Busch
Jonathan Busch
JSJulia K. Steinberger
Julia K. Steinberger
DDDavid Dawson
David Dawson
PPPhil Purnell
Phil Purnell
KRKaty Roelich
Katy Roelich
The transition to low carbon infrastructure systems required to meet climate change mitigation targets will involve an unprecedented roll-out of technologies reliant upon materials not previously widespread in infrastructure. Many of these materials (including lithium and rare earth metals) are at risk of supply disruption. To ensure the future sustainability and resilience of infrastructure, circular economy policies must be crafted to manage these critical materials effectively. These policies can only be effective if supported by an understanding of the material demands of infrastructure transition and what reuse and recycling options are possible given the future availability of end-of-life stocks. This Article presents a novel, enhanced stocks and flows model for the dynamic assessment of material demands resulting from infrastructure transitions. By including a hierarchical, nested description of infrastructure technologies, their components, and the materials they contain, this model can be used to quantify the effectiveness of recovery at both a technology remanufacturing and reuse level and a material recycling level. The model’s potential is demonstrated on a case study on the roll-out of electric vehicles in the UK forecast by UK Department of Energy and Climate Change scenarios. The results suggest policy action should be taken to ensure Li-ion battery recycling infrastructure is in place by 2025 and NdFeB motor magnets should be designed for reuse. This could result in a reduction in primary demand for lithium of 40% and neodymium of 70%.

24 May 2019 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Richard FennerRichard Fenner
Richard Fenner
Emily O'DonnellEmily O'Donnell
Emily O'Donnell
Sangaralingam AhilanSangaralingam Ahilan
Sangaralingam Ahilan
DDDavid Dawson
David Dawson
LKLEON KAPETAS
LEON KAPETAS
VKVercruysse Kim
Vercruysse Kim
Preliminary results of the UK Urban Flood Resilience research consortium are presented and discussed, with the work being conducted against a background of future uncertainties with respect to changing climate and increasing urbanization. Adopting a whole systems approach, key themes include developing adaptive approaches for flexible engineering design of coupled grey and blue-green flood management assets; exploiting the resource potential of urban stormwater through rainwater harvesting, urban metabolism modelling and interoperability; and investigating the interactions between planners, developers, engineers and communities at multiple scales in managing flood risk. The work is producing new modelling tools and an extensive evidence base to support the case for multifunctional infrastructure that delivers multiple, environmental, societal and economic benefits, while enhancing urban flood resilience by bringing stormwater management and green infrastructure together.

1 April 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJonathan Busch
Jonathan Busch
DDDavid Dawson
David Dawson
KRKaty Roelich
Katy Roelich

1 August 2018 in Ecological Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DDDavid Dawson
David Dawson
AHAlistair Hunt
Alistair Hunt
JSJon Shaw
Jon Shaw
WGW. Roland Gehrels
W. Roland Gehrels