(1) Background: Accessory liver lobes are a rare finding and only a few case reports of accessory liver lobes in abdominal wall defects have been reported so far. In the case of a congenital wall defect including liver parenchyma, there is still an ongoing debate on the definition of the abdominal wall defect and best care practice. Even though congenital abdominal wall defects are frequently diagnosed in prenatal screenings, controversy on the underlying etiology, embryology and underlying anatomy remains. Prenatal distinction between omphalocele and hernia into the cord cannot always be obtained; however, due to its clinical relevance for postnatal management and counseling of parents, accurate diagnosis is essential. (2) Case Presentation: We describe the uncommon postnatal finding of a pediculated accessory liver lobe with gallbladder in a preterm with umbilical cord hernia, which was prenatally diagnosed as omphalocele. Postnatal examination revealed an amniotic sac with a diameter of six and a small abdominal wall defect of three centimeters in diameter. Postnatal management included resection of the accessory liver lobe and gallbladder and closure of the defect. (3) Results and (4) Conclusions: Throughout the literature, the distinction between umbilical cord hernia and omphalocele has been variable. This has led to confusion and difficulties regarding postnatal treatment options. In order to achieve an accurate prenatal and/or postnatal diagnosis, the morphological differences and clinical manifestation of umbilical cord hernia and omphalocele need to be assessed. Further embryological studies are warranted to understand the underlying embryological pathology of omphalocele and umbilical cord hernia and offer appropriate treatment. In consideration of possibly severe complications in the case of the torsion of a pedunculated accessory liver lobe, we strongly recommend primary removal once pre- or intraoperative identification has been made.

Pancreatic trauma in children is rare; therefore, both scientific knowledge and clinical experience regarding its management are limited. Abdominal sonography and subsequent computed tomography (CT) imaging are the diagnostic mainstay after severe abdominal trauma in many pediatric trauma centers. However, the diagnosis of pancreatic injury is missed on the initial imaging in approximately one third of cases, with even higher numbers in young children. While conservative treatment is preferred in low-grade injuries, surgical interventions may be indicated in more severe injuries. We present a case series including four patients with high-grade pancreatic injury. Two patients were treated surgically with open laparotomy and primary suture of the head of the pancreas and pancreatico-enterostomy, one patient underwent endoscopic stenting of the pancreatic duct and one received conservative management including observation and secondary endoscopic treatment. We want to emphasize the fact that using a minimally invasive approach can be a feasible option in high-grade pancreatic injury in selected cases. Therefore, we advocate the necessity of fully staffed and equipped high-level pediatric trauma centers.