The invasive capabilities of glioblastoma (GBM) define the cancer’s aggressiveness, treatment resistance, and overall mortality. The tumor microenvironment influences the molecular behavior of cells, both epigenetically and genetically. Current forces being studied include properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM), such as stiffness and “sensing” capabilities. There is currently limited data on the physical forces in GBM—both relating to how they influence their environment and how their environment influences them. This review outlines the advances that have been made in the field. It is our hope that further investigation of the physical forces involved in GBM will highlight new therapeutic options and increase patient survival. A search of the PubMed database was conducted through to 23 March 2022 with the following search terms: (glioblastoma) AND (physical forces OR pressure OR shear forces OR compression OR tension OR torsion) AND (migration OR invasion). Our review yielded 11 external/applied/mechanical forces and 2 tumor microenvironment (TME) forces that affect the ability of GBM to locally migrate and invade. Both external forces and forces within the tumor microenvironment have been implicated in GBM migration, invasion, and treatment resistance. We endorse further research in this area to target the physical forces affecting the migration and invasion of GBM.

Introduction: Chordoma is a rare, aggressive tumor that is believed to originate from notochord remnants. It can occur anywhere from the clivus to the sacrum and often recurs even after resection and radiotherapy. We present a unique case that initially suggested a different pathology based on imaging and presentation but was found to be a chordoma on gross and pathological analysis. Case Presentation: An 11-year-old girl presented outpatient for scoliosis evaluation and was found to have what appeared to be a right L4 peripheral nerve sheath tumor on MRI, causing dextroconvex scoliosis. She underwent a gross total resection via a retroperitoneal approach and was found to have what appeared to be an extraosseous, extradural, extra-spinal canal lumbar chordoma. Immunohistochemical features on surgical pathology were consistent with chordoma. The patient was referred to radiation oncology for adjuvant radiotherapy and pediatric hematology/oncology for recurrence monitoring. Discussion: Our case is the first to present in such a manner, was shown to be external to the spinal canal, encasing the nerve root, and was the first such case in a pediatric patient. We reviewed the growing body of literature on spinal extraosseous chordomas and their characteristics within the pediatric patient population. We also reviewed chordoma pathogenesis theories as well as current and future treatment options.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: The second stage of deep brain stimulation requires the placement of an implantable pulse generator (IPG). Although the current placement technique achieves acceptable outcomes, device erosion has been reported. We describe a simple surgical option aimed at increasing device longevity by placing the hardware under the superficial pectoralis fascia. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: We describe and illustrate the technique of placing the IPG in the subfascial space in a patient undergoing deep brain stimulation. In addition, we provide pearls and pitfalls to be mindful of when implementing this method. CONCLUSION: In this technical report, we have outlined a simple alternative approach to the traditional subcutaneous IPG placement by placing the IPG under the superficial pectoralis fascia. This subfascial approach can potentially reduce complications and preserve device longevity.