Objectives Glucose homeostasis changes after pancreatic resection are not well understood. We aimed to identify the incidence of, and risk factors for, a change in glucose homeostasis in patients who underwent pancreatectomy for benign pancreatic tumors. Methods Clinical and pathological data from 229 patients were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The pancreas resection volume was calculated by computed tomography volumetry. Results After pancreatectomy, newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) occurred in 52 patients (22.7%) and impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance occurred in 74 patients (32.3%). The incidence of DM was highest for patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP) (30.5%). Patients in the DP group had a significantly increased rate of DM as the pancreatic resection volume (in milliliters) and resected volume ratio (in percent) increased. A high body mass index and older age were significant risk factors for the development of DM by multivariate analysis. Conclusions The resection volume of the pancreas is associated with a change in glucose homeostasis after pancreatectomy. Therefore, preservation of the pancreatic parenchyma is important to minimize the onset of DM in patients with a high pancreatic resected volume ratio (>35.6%) in DP, a high body mass index, or in old age.

Over the past two decades, the age of liver transplantation (LT) recipients has been increasing. We reviewed our experience with LT for patients aged ≥70 years (range: 70–78 years) and investigated the feasibility of performing LT, especially living donor LT (LDLT), for older patients. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 25 patients (15 LDLT recipients, 10 deceased donor LT recipients) aged ≥70 years who underwent LT from January 2000 to April 2016. Their perioperative morbidity rate was 28.0%, and the in‐hospital mortality rate was 16.0%; these results were comparable to those of matched patients in their 60s (n = 73; morbidity, p = 0.726; mortality, p = 0.816). For patients in their 70s, the 1‐ and 5‐year patient survival rates were 84.0% and 69.8%, and the 1‐ and 5‐year graft survival rates were 83.5% and 75.1%, respectively. Comparisons of patient and graft survival rates between matched patients in their 60s and 70s showed no statistically significant differences (patient survival, p = 0.372; graft survival, p = 0.183). Our experience suggests that patients aged ≥70 years should not be excluded from LT, or even LDLT, based solely on age and implies that careful selection of recipients and donors as well as meticulous surgical technique are necessary for successful results.

Simultaneous splenectomy (SSPX) in adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) has definitely beneficial roles such as portal flow modulation in small‐for‐size graft and correction of hypersplenism‐related pancytopenia, and so on, but disastrous complications after SSPX often occur. For the first time, we devised unique and innovative splenic devascularization (SDV) procedure to alleviated untoward effects of SSPX but to maintain its benefits for the indicated patients. From April 2013 to December 2014, 520 recipients underwent ALDLT, and the SSPX and SDV were simultaneously performed in 62 (11.9%) and 61 (11.7%) patients respectively. The most common indication was hypersplenism‐related pancytopenia (n=101), small‐for‐size graft (n=14), HCV (n=7), and splenic artery aneurysm (n=1). Postoperative small‐for‐size graft syndrome (SFSS) was absent in both SSPX and SDV, and preoperative pancytopenia was improved in both groups since postoperative 1 week, although SSPX was more substantial than SDV. Preoperative splenic volume (706.2 ± 282.9 mL) after SDV significantly decreased to 425.5 ± 204.4 mL on 1 month, respectively. In contrast to SDV, SSPX resulted in longer operation time and higher incidence of postoperative complications including mortality. In conclusion, SDV can replace SSPX during ALDLT without hampering its beneficial roles seriously, but get rid of splenectomy‐related lethal complication.

Park S, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2022 Dec;23(12):1260-1268. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2022.0334

Background: The relative benefit of anatomical resection (AR) versus non-anatomical resection (NAR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. This study compared the survival outcomes and recurrence rates of HCCs analysed according to tumour size and the extent of resection. Methods: Consecutive patients with HCC who underwent curative resection at Asan Medical Center between January 1999 and December 2009 were included in this study. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) according to tumour size to compare the survival outcomes between AR and NAR. A total of 986 patients were analysed; 812 and 174 patients underwent AR and NAR, respectively. Results: Before PSM, regardless of tumour size, the AR group demonstrated significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) than the NAR group (p < 0.001). After PSM, the AR group demonstrated better OS and RFS rates than the NAR group when tumour size was less than 5 cm, but there was no significant difference in the OS and RFS rates between the two groups when tumour size was equal to or greater than 5 cm. In tumours less than 5 cm in size, AR was the most significant factor associated with OS and RFS. However, this prognostic effect of AR was not demonstrated in tumours with sizes equal to or greater than 5 cm. Conclusion: In patients with HCCs smaller than 5 cm, AR reduced the risk of tumour recurrence and improved OS. In HCCs larger than 5 cm, AR and NAR showed comparable survival outcomes.