Khe Foon Hew

Dr. Khe Foon Hew

Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 March 2018 in BMC Medical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKhe Foon Hew
Khe Foon Hew
CLChung Kwan Lo
Chung Kwan Lo
The use of flipped classroom approach has become increasingly popular in health professions education. However, no meta-analysis has been published that specifically examines the effect of flipped classroom versus traditional classroom on student learning. This study examined the findings of comparative articles through a meta-analysis in order to summarize the overall effects of teaching with the flipped classroom approach. We focused specifically on a set of flipped classroom studies in which pre-recorded videos were provided before face-to-face class meetings. These comparative articles focused on health care professionals including medical students, residents, doctors, nurses, or learners in other health care professions and disciplines (e.g., dental, pharmacy, environmental or occupational health). Using predefined study eligibility criteria, seven electronic databases were searched in mid-April 2017 for relevant articles. Methodological quality was graded using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). Effect sizes, heterogeneity estimates, analysis of possible moderators, and publication bias were computed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. A meta-analysis of 28 eligible comparative studies (between-subject design) showed an overall significant effect in favor of flipped classrooms over traditional classrooms for health professions education (standardized mean difference, SMD = 0.33, 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.21–0.46, p < 0.001), with no evidence of publication bias. In addition, the flipped classroom approach was more effective when instructors used quizzes at the start of each in-class session. More respondents reported they preferred flipped to traditional classrooms. Current evidence suggests that the flipped classroom approach in health professions education yields a significant improvement in student learning compared with traditional teaching methods.

24 September 2021 in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WHWeijiao Huang
Weijiao Huang
KHKhe Foon Hew
Khe Foon Hew
LFLuke K. Fryer
Luke K. Fryer

20 December 2009 in British Journal of Educational Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KHKhe Foon Hew
Khe Foon Hew
WCWing Sum Cheung
Wing Sum Cheung

8 June 2024 in Computers & Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Chung Kwan LoChung Kwan Lo
Chung Kwan Lo
KHKhe Foon Hew
Khe Foon Hew
Morris JONGMorris JONG
Morris JONG

22 December 2014 in British Journal of Educational Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KHKhe Foon Hew
Khe Foon Hew

9 April 2018 in Interactive Learning Environments
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBiyun Huang
Biyun Huang
KHKhe Foon Hew
Khe Foon Hew
Chung Kwan LoChung Kwan Lo
Chung Kwan Lo
In recent years, flipped learning has attracted much attention around the world. This instructional approach is appealing because it can free up class time for knowledge application activities with help from the instructor and peers. However, its implementation can be fraught with challenges. Student disengagement in out-of-class activities, for example, is one of the major challenges of flipped learning. The purpose of this study is to examine whether gamification can enhance student engagement in a flipped course. A comparison study was conducted, involving two classes of undergraduate students in an Information Management course. The results indicated that students in the gamification-enhanced flipped learning group (n = 48) were more likely to complete the pre-class and post-class activities on time than those in the non-gamified flipped learning group (n = 48). Students in the gamification-enhanced flipped learning group also produced higher quality artifacts than the non-gamified flipped learning group in the pre-class thinking activities. Moreover, students in the gamification-enhanced flipped learning group scored significantly higher in the post-course test than did their non-gamified counterparts.