The Clinical Practice Manual for Hepatocellular Carcinoma was published based on evidence confirmed by the Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma along with consensus opinion among a Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) expert panel on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since the JSH Clinical Practice Guidelines are based on original articles with extremely high levels of evidence, expert opinions on HCC management in clinical practice or consensus on newly developed treatments are not included. However, the practice manual incorporates the literature based on clinical data, expert opinion, and real-world clinical practice currently conducted in Japan to facilitate its use by clinicians. Alongside each revision of the JSH Guidelines, we issued an update to the manual, with the first edition of the manual published in 2007, the second edition in 2010, the third edition in 2015, and the fourth edition in 2020, which includes the 2017 edition of the JSH Guideline. This article is an excerpt from the fourth edition of the HCC Clinical Practice Manual focusing on pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of HCC. It is designed as a practical manual different from the latest version of the JSH Clinical Practice Guidelines. This practice manual was written by an expert panel from the JSH, with emphasis on the consensus statements and recommendations for the management of HCC proposed by the JSH expert panel. In this article, we included newly developed clinical practices that are relatively common among Japanese experts in this field, although all of their statements are not associated with a high level of evidence, but these practices are likely to be incorporated into guidelines in the future. To write this article, coauthors from different institutions drafted the content and then critically reviewed each other’s work. The revised content was then critically reviewed by the Board of Directors and the Planning and Public Relations Committee of JSH before publication to confirm the consensus statements and recommendations. The consensus statements and recommendations presented in this report represent measures actually being conducted at the highest-level HCC treatment centers in Japan. We hope this article provides insight into the actual situation of HCC practice in Japan, thereby affecting the global practice pattern in the management of HCC.

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to elucidate the utility of two non-invasive predictive procedures for liver fibrosis: the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI) and the BARD score (which includes the following three variables: body mass index, AST/alanine aminotransferase ratio, and diabetes) in the prediction of HCC in a large population of Japanese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a public hospital. Study subjects included 6,508 patients with NAFLD diagnosed by ultrasonography. The median follow-up period was 5.6 years. The primary end point was the onset of HCC. Evaluation was performed using Kaplan–Meier methodology and Cox's proportional hazards analysis. In all, 16 (0.25%) new cases with HCC were diagnosed during the study. The cumulative rates of NAFLD-related HCC were 0.02% at year 4, 0.19% at year 8, and 0.51% at year 12. The annual rate of new HCC was 0.043%. Multivariate analysis identified serum AST level ≥40 IU/L (hazard ratio (HR): 8.20; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.56–26.26; P<0.001), platelet count <150 × 10³/μl (HR: 7.19; 95% CI: 2.26–23.26; P=0.001), age ≥60 years (HR: 4.27; 95% CI: 1.30–14.01; P=0.017), and diabetes (HR: 3.21; 95% CI: 1.09–9.50; P=0.035) as independent risk factors for HCC. With regard to the APRI, 184 patients (2.83%) were considered to have significant fibrosis (equivalent to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) stage 3–4). The cumulative rate of HCC was significantly higher in this group (HR: 25.03; 95% CI: 9.02–69.52; P<0.001). In contrast, regarding the BARD score, 3,841 (59%) patients were considered to have advanced fibrosis (NASH stage 3–4). However, no significant associations between the BARD score and the incidence of HCC were observed (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.40–3.37; P=0.780). This retrospective study indicates that the annual incidence rate of HCC among Japanese NAFLD patients is low. Elderly NAFLD patients with diabetes, elevated serum AST, and especially thrombocytopenia (suggested to be associated with advanced liver fibrosis) should be monitored carefully during follow-up that includes using the APRI to ensure early diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Summary: Background: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an aetiologic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Baseline HBV DNA is a known independent predictor of HCC, and the serum hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) level corresponds to intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA.Aim: To investigate whether the baseline and on‐treatment serum HBcrAg levels can predict HCC incidence in patients with chronic hepatitis B following nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1268 patients treated with NAs for >1 year. In all patients, serum HBcrAg and hepatitis B surface antigen levels were measured at baseline and 1 year.Results: During a median follow‐up of 8.9 years, 113 patients (8.9%) developed HCC (10.3/1000 person‐years). These patients were stratified by baseline hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) status into HBeAg+ and HBeAg‐ cohorts. High on‐treatment HBcrAg levels at 1 year were found to associate significantly with HCC (HBeAg+ cohort: P = 0.017; HBeAg‐ cohort: P = 4.30 × 10⁻⁵; cut‐off values: 4.9 log U/mL and 4.4 log U/mL, respectively). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, patients with persistently high on‐treatment HBcrAg levels had a higher risk of HCC than those with low HBcrAg levels (HBeAg+: hazard ratio [HR], 6.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.89‐20.0, P = 0.003; HBeAg‐ cohort: HR, 2.54, 95% CI: 1.40‐4.60; P = 0.002). A sub‐analysis of patients without alcoholism yielded similar findings.Conclusions: Patients with persistently high on‐treatment HBcrAg levels were more likely to develop HCC despite sustained viral suppression via long‐term NA treatment.

Background: The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of additional treatment, especially lenvatinib-transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) sequential therapy, for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Consecutive 56 patients who underwent lenvatinib treatment were reviewed. Oncological aggressiveness of tumor was estimated using a dynamic CT enhancement pattern classification, and clinical impact of subsequent treatment was investigated through analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS), and multivariate analysis of potential confounders for survival after progression during lenvatinib therapy. Results: Heterogeneous enhancement patterns (Type-3 and -4), which are reportedly associated with higher oncological aggressiveness of HCC, were associated with better objective response to lenvatinib compared to homogeneous enhancement pattern (Type-2) (86 and 85% vs. 53% in modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), resulting in similar PFS (p = 0.313). Because of significantly worse PPS, overall survival of Type-4 tumor was poor compared to Type-2 or -3 tumors (p = 0.009). However, subgroup of patients who achieved subsequent treatment showed significantly better PPS, regardless of CT enhancement pattern. Multivariate analysis confirmed that use of lenvatinib-TACE sequential treatment after progression during lenvatinib therapy was associated with better PPS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01–0.71; p = 0.023), while Type-4 enhancement pattern was correlated with worse PPS (HR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.06–8.05; p = 0.039). Conclusion: Oncological aggressiveness of HCC estimated by CT enhancement pattern was predictive of PPS after progression during lenvatinib. Successful subsequent treatment with lenvatinib-TACE sequential therapy may offer survival benefit regardless of CT enhancement pattern of HCC.