The bZIP (basic leucine zipper) transcription factors have been identified as key regulators of plant responses to drought stress, which limits plant growth and yield. Overexpression of bZIP genes has shown potential in enhancing drought tolerance in various plant species. However, the constrained types of individual studies and inconsistencies among experimental approaches has resulted in a lack of statistical significance and limited the extrapolation of bZIP transcription factor overexpression for plant improvement. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate ten measured parameters of drought tolerance in bZIP transcription factor-expressing plants as well as moderators affecting the performance of transgenic plants. The results showed that seven parameters, including survival rate as well as the content of regulatory substances (proline accumulation, H2O2 concentration, CAT activity, POD activity, SOD activity and MDA accumulation), were most affected while the impact on physiological status indicators is not significant. In addition, donor/recipient species, treatment medium, duration and methods of simulating drought stress all significantly impacted the degree of drought stress tolerance in plants to some extent among the considered moderators. The findings underscore the potential of bZIP transcription factors as key targets for genetic engineering approaches aimed at improving plant resilience to water scarcity.
Abiotic stress is one of the environmental conditions that effects plant survival and growth. As a vital model plant and papermaking raw material, it is very important to identify the differentially expressed genes of Populus trichocarpa Torr. & A.Gray ex Hook under abiotic stress in order to cultivate stress-tolerant plants. We analyzed the whole transcription spectrum and potential differentially expressed genes of 54 groups of roots and stem-xylem sequencing sample data under cold, drought, heat and salt stress for different durations. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis showed that molecular function played a stronger role in stems’ response to abiotic stress, and genes in roots could barely respond to both cold stress and heat stress. Degree and betweenness centrality were used to identify transcription factors. It was considered that intermediate centrality is more suitable to determine whether the transcription factor is a hub gene. DNA binding was the biggest enrichment, while transcription factors responded to the abiotic stress. The multipronged approach identified in the roots and stems provides a genetic basis for resistance and more targeted genetic improvement of Populus trichocarpa. The comparison of two centralities can more effectively analyze the importance of complex gene network nodes in plants under corresponding abiotic stresses.