Exogenous calcium (Ca) has been used to induce host plant resistance in response to abiotic and biotic stresses, including from thrips attack. The aim of this study was to determine whether exogenously applied Ca affects the performance of Frankliniella occidentalis. We assessed the development time, total longevity, reproduction, and population parameters of F. occidentalis, and its preference choice on Ca-treated or untreated control kidney bean plants under laboratory conditions. The results showed that F. occidentalis fed on Ca-treated leaves had a longer developmental time but lower longevity (female and male) and fecundity than F. occidentalis fed on control leaves. Population parameters, including the intrinsic rate of increase (r), finite rate of increase (λ), and net reproductive rate (R₀), were all found higher in control leaves than in Ca-treated leaves, and the mean generation time (T) was shorter. In preference choices, the number of thrips on control plants was higher than the number of thrips on Ca-treated kidney bean plants. Overall, our results indicated that exogenous Ca pretreatment on kidney bean plants affected the life history and preference choice of F. occidentalis, suggesting Ca might be used as a promising elicitor of inducible plant defense against thrips.

Herbivore-induced defense responses are often specific, whereas plants could induce distinct defense responses corresponding to infestation by different herbivorous insects. Brown plant hopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens, a phloem-feeding insect, and rice leaf folder (LF) Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, a chewing insect, are both specialist herbivores on rice. To characterize the distinct resistance primed by prior damage to these two specialist herbivores, we challenged rice plants with two herbivores during vegetative growth of parent plants and assessed plant resistance in subsequent ratoons. Here, we show that LF and BPH induce different suites of defense responses in parent rice plants, LF induced higher level of JA accumulation and OsAOS, OsCOI1 transcripts, while BPH induced higher accumulation of SA and OsPAL1 transcripts. Moreover, an apparent loss of LF resistance was observed in OsAOS, OsCOI1 RNAi lines. Ratoon plants generated from parents receiving prior LF infestation exhibited higher jasmonic acid (JA) levels and elevated levels of transcripts of defense-related genes associated with JA signaling, while ratoon generated from parents receiving prior BPH infestation exhibited higher salicylic acid (SA) levels and elevated levels of transcripts of defense-related genes associated with SA signaling. Moreover, previous LF infestation obviously elevated ratoons resistance to LF, while previous infestation by BPH led to enhanced resistance in ratoons to BPH. Pre-priming of ratoons defense to LF was significantly reduced in OsAOS and OsCOI1 RNAi plant, but silencing OsAOS and OsCOI1 did not attenuate ratoons resistance to BPH. These results suggest that infestation of two specialist herbivores with different feeding styles in parent crop led to distinct defense responses in subsequent rations, and the acquired resistance to LF in ratoons is associated with priming of jasmonic acid-dependent defense responses.

Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) is a volatile substance derived from jasmonic acid (JA), and it responds to interbiotic and abiotic stresses by participating in interplant communication. Despite its function in interplant communication, the specific role of MeJA in insect defense responses is poorly understood. In this study, we found that carboxylesterase (CarE) activities, glutathione-S-transferase (GSTs) activities, and cytochrome mono-oxygenases (P450s) content increased more after the feeding of diets containing xanthotoxin, while larvae exposed to MeJA fumigation also showed higher enzyme activity in a dose-dependent manner: lower and medium concentrations of MeJA induced higher detoxification enzyme activities than higher concentrations of MeJA. Moreover, MeJA improved the growth of larvae fed on the control diet without toxins and diets with lower concentrations of xanthotoxin (0.05%); however, MeJA could not protect the larvae against higher concentrations of xanthotoxin (0.1%, 0.2%). In summary, we demonstrated that MeJA is effective at inducing S. litura defense response, but the enhanced detoxifying ability could not overcome the strong toxins.