Gallium-labeled positron emission tomography (PET) probes targeting activated fibroblasts or somatostatin receptor expression are frequently used for varying applications in oncology. With the widespread availability of ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga generators and cold kits, ⁶⁸Ga tracers have become a main tool in molecular imaging. These tracers, such as [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI, and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-pentixafor, allow targeted imaging of the key pathological processes, including inflammation, fibrosis, and necrosis. This review highlights their potential in conditions like myocardial infarction, cardiac sarcoidosis, myocarditis, and other cardiomyopathies. Clinical and preclinical studies underscore their utility in visualizing active disease processes, predicting outcomes, and guiding therapeutic strategies. However, challenges remain, including the need for standardization, larger clinical trials, and integration into routine practice. These advancements position ⁶⁸Ga-based PET as a promising modality for enhancing diagnostic precision and personalized treatment in cardiovascular disease.

Aims: Factors underlying clinical tolerance and hemodynamic consequences of monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) need to be clarified. Methods: Intra-arterial pressures (IAP) during VT were collected in patients admitted for VT ablation and correlated to clinical, ECG and baseline echocardiographical parameters. Results: 114 VTs from 58 patients were included (median 67 years old, 81% ischemic heart disease, median left ventricular ejection fraction 30%). 61 VTs were untolerated needing immediate termination (54%). VT tolerance was tightly linked to the evolution of IAPs. Faster VT rates (p<0.0001), presence of resynchronization therapy (p = 0.008), previous anterior myocardial infarction (p = 0.009) and more marginally larger baseline QRS duration (p = 0.1) were independently associated with VT tolerance. Only an inferior myocardial infarction was more often present in patients with only tolerated VTs vs patients with only untolerated VTs in multivariate analysis (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.4–1000, p = 0.03). In patients with both well-tolerated and untolerated VTs, a higher VT rate was the only variable independently associated with untolerated VT (p = 0.02). Two different patterns of hemodynamic profiles during VT could be observed: a regular 1:1 relationship between electrical (QRS) and mechanical (IAP) events or some dissociation between both. VT with the second pattern were more often untolerated compared to the first pattern (78% vs 29%, p<0.0001). Conclusion: This study helps to explain the large variability in clinical tolerance during VT, which is clearly related to IAP. VT tolerance may be linked to resynchronization therapy, VT rate, baseline QRS duration and location of myocardial infarction.

BackgroundToxic dilated cardiomyopathy (T-DCM) due to substance abuse is now recognized as a potential cause of severe left ventricular dysfunction. The burden of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and the role of a prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are not well documented in this population. We aim to assess the usefulness of ICD implantation in a T-DCM cohort. MethodsPatients younger than 65 years with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35% followed at a tertiary center heart failure (HF) clinic between January 2003 and August 2019 were screened for inclusion. The diagnosis of T-DCM was confirmed after excluding other etiologies, and substance abuse was established according to the DSM-5 criteria. The composite primary endpoints were arrhythmic syncope, sudden cardiac death (SCD), or death of unknown cause. The secondary endpoints were the occurrence of sustained VA and/or appropriate therapies in ICD carriers. ResultsThirty-eight patients were identified, and an ICD was implanted in 19 (50%) of these patients, only one for secondary prevention. The primary outcome was similar between the two groups (ICD vs. non-ICD; p = 1.00). After a mean follow-up of 33 +/- 36 months, only two VA episodes were reported in the ICD group. Three patients received inappropriate ICD therapies. One ICD implantation was complicated with cardiac tamponade. Twenty-three patients (61%) had an LVEF >= 35% at 12 months. ConclusionVA are infrequent in the T-DCM population. The prophylactic ICD benefit was not observed in our cohort. The ideal timing for potential prophylactic ICD implantation in this population needs further studies.

Introduction: Superior vena cava (SVC) tear is the most lethal complication during transvenous lead extraction (TLE) with a mortality rate as high as 50%. Treatment involves aggressive attempts to maintain cardiac output and immediate sternotomy to localize and repair the vascular tear. Occlusion balloons have been developed to provisionally occlude the lacerated SVC and to provide hemodynamic stability allowing time for surgery. In case of mediastinal hematoma without hemodynamic instability, the strategy remains unclear.Methods and Results: We describe two cases of SVC tear during TLE. The first case was a 60‐year‐old man who presented with a right ventricular single‐chamber defibrillator lead fracture and innominate vein stenosis. The RV lead was removed using a laser sheath causing a mediastinal hematoma with no active bleeding during surgical exploration few hours later. The second case was a 28‐year‐old man that presented with a right atrial (RA) lead fracture and RV lead insulation failure in a dual‐chamber defibrillator (ICD).Conclusion: Both the RA and RV leads were removed with mechanical sheaths, and a mediastinal hematoma was medically managed.

Background: Ozanimod is a novel immune modulator that could be useful in viral pulmonary infections by reducing lung inflammation. It is an S1P receptor ligand known to induce bradycardia and more serious adverse cardiac effects, such as atrioventricular block and QT interval prolongation. We present a substudy of the COVID-19 Ozanimod Intervention (COZI) trial in which ozanimod was administered in acute pulmonary infection patients, to assess cardiac safety. Methods: In this pilot randomized open-label trial, COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen support were randomized into 2 groups: standard-of-care + ozanimod (OZA) vs standard-of-care alone (SOC). All patients were monitored with a 14-day electrocardiogram monitor (CardioSTAT, Icentia, Quebec, QC) during their hospitalization. We evaluated the cardiac effects of ozanimod on heart rate (HR), PR interval length, and QT interval duration. Results: A total of 42 patients were analyzed: 23 in the SOC group and 19 in the OZA group. Mean hourly HR over the first 10 days of treatment decreased in the OZA group, compared with that in the SOC group (P < 0.0001). The maximum decrease in HR occurred on day 3. The maximum decrease in HR occurred on day 3, without a significant difference between groups: 49 beats per minute (interquartile range, 42-59) in the OZA group, and 54 beats per minute (48-60) in the SOC group, P = 0.45. No high-degree atrioventricular block was recorded. QT and PR interval median values were within the normal range in both groups, without a significant difference. Conclusions: The maximal reduction in HR occurred 3 days after the onset of ozanimod treatment in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, but it did not remain significant over the 10-day treatment period. No relevant cardiac adverse event was observed.