In a retrospective analysis, Dickerson et al report that the incidence of hypertension in patients treated with ibruitinib is nearly 80% and is associated with an increased rate of adverse cardiovascular events, primarily atrial fibrillation. Cardiac events can be reduced by treating the hypertension.

Over the past decade, the treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has dramatically changed, shifting from cytotoxic chemotherapy to targeted therapies. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of CLL and are increasingly applied in many other malignancies. However, ibrutinib, the first BTK inhibitor approved, is associated with serious toxicities, including atrial fibrillation in up to 38% of patients, ventricular arrhythmias, and other cardiovascular toxicities. Emerging data suggest several newer BTK inhibitors (eg, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib) are still associated with cardiotoxic risks. This review examines the current state of evidence, including incidence rates, risk factors, mechanisms, and management strategies of cardiovascular toxicities with BTK inhibitors and other CLL therapies. We specifically focus on atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias/sudden death, hypertension, heart failure, bleeding, and stroke. We also touch on other emerging BTK therapies (eg, pirtobrutinib). Finally, we highlight key unanswered questions and future directions of research.

Background: Engagement is essential for the effectiveness of digital behavior change interventions. Existing systematic reviews examining hypertension self-management interventions via mobile apps have primarily focused on intervention efficacy and app usability. Engagement in the prevention or management of hypertension is largely unknown. Objective: This systematic review explores the definition and role of engagement in hypertension-focused mobile health (mHealth) interventions, as well as how determinants of engagement (ie, tailoring and interactivity) have been implemented. Methods: A systematic review of mobile app interventions for hypertension self-management targeting adults, published from 2013 to 2020, was conducted. A total of 21 studies were included in this systematic review. Results: The engagement was defined or operationalized as a microlevel concept, operationalized as interaction with the interventions (ie, frequency of engagement, time or duration of engagement with the program, and intensity of engagement). For all 3 studies that tested the relationship, increased engagement was associated with better biomedical outcomes (eg, blood pressure change). Interactivity was limited in digital behavior change interventions, as only 7 studies provided 2-way communication between users and a health care professional, and 9 studies provided 1-way communication in possible critical conditions; that is, when abnormal blood pressure values were recorded, users or health care professionals were notified. The tailoring of interventions varied at different aspects, from the tailoring of intervention content (including goals, patient education, advice and feedback from health professionals, reminders, and motivational messages) to the tailoring of intervention dose and communication mode. Tailoring was carried out in a number of ways, considering patient characteristics such as goals, preferences, disease characteristics (eg, hypertension stage and medication list), disease self-management experience levels, medication adherence rate, and values and beliefs. Conclusions: Available studies support the importance of engagement in intervention effectiveness as well as the essential roles of patient factors in tailoring, interactivity, and engagement. A patient-centered engagement framework for hypertension self-management using mHealth technology is proposed here, with the intent of facilitating intervention design and disease self-management using mHealth technology.

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have altered the treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) by offering effective and well-tolerated therapeutic options. However, since the approval of ibrutinib, concern has risen regarding the risk of cardiovascular (CV) adverse events, including atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension, and heart failure. Newer BTKis appear to have lower CV risks, but data are limited. It is important to understand the risks posed by BTKis and how those risks interact with individual patients, and we convened a panel of physicians with expertise in CLL and CV toxicities in oncology to develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for community hematologists and oncologists. Care providers should thoroughly assess a patient’s CV risk level before treatment initiation, including established CV diseases and risk factors, and perform investigations dependent on preexisting diseases and risk factors, including an electrocardiogram (ECG). For patients with high CV risk, BTKi treatment is often appropriate in consultation with a multidisciplinary team (MDT), and more selective BTKis, including acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, are preferred. BTKi treatment should generally be avoided in patients with a history of heart failure. Ibrutinib should be avoided in patients with a history of ventricular arrhythmias, but the risk of newer drugs is not yet known. Finally, an MDT is crucial to help manage emerging toxicities with the goal of maintaining BTKi therapy, if possible. Optimizing heart failure, arrhythmia, and hypertension control will likely improve tolerance and maintenance of BTKi therapy. However, additional studies are needed to identify the most optimal strategy for these drugs.