Studies on frequency and underlying diseases causing binocular diplopia in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) are lacking. To evaluate the prevalence of different diseases causing diplopia and the role of medical history, clinical examination, and unenhanced head computed tomography (UHCT) in the identification of secondary diplopia. Diplopic patients presenting to the ED were enrolled prospectively. Cardiovascular risk factors and associated neurological signs and symptoms were reported. UHCT was performed in the ED. Secondary diplopia was diagnosed in 93 of 260 (35.8%) diplopic patients. Among patients with secondary diplopia, the most frequent diagnoses were stroke (45.2%), multiple sclerosis (18.3%), brain tumors (11.8%), and cerebral aneurysms (7.5%). The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was similar in primary and secondary diplopia. Among the 118 (45.4%) patients without associated neurological signs or symptoms (isolated diplopia), secondary diplopia was diagnosed in 13 (11%); UHCT was negative in all 13 cases, with a derived null sensitivity. Eighty of 142 (56.3%) patients with associated signs or symptoms had secondary diplopia. The presence of signs or symptoms associated with diplopia showed a sensitivity of 87% [95% confidence interval (CI): 80-92%] and a specificity of 63% (95% CI: 59-66%) for the diagnosis of secondary diplopia. In this group, UHCT identified 30 of 80 (37.5%) cases, increasing the specificity to 98% (95% CI: 96-99%). One-third of diplopic patients had secondary diplopia. In patients with isolated diplopia, UHCT does not increase diagnostic sensitivity. In patients with associated neurological signs or symptoms, the prevalence of secondary diplopia was high and UHCT showed incremental diagnostic value.

Adverse drug reactions represent a significant public health problem. A share of no small adverse reaction is particularly serious and can even lead to patient’s death. Furthermore, hepatitis induced by serious drug reactions is a rare event but potentially fatal. Finally, we know that epidemiological studies have highlighted male gender as an independent predictor of fibrosis progression towards cirrhosis in hepatitis B and C-virus, as well as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. The importance of considering the differences between the male and female sex in clinical decision-making is crucial. The physiopathology of liver disease is different in the two genres, but these differences are not yet fully known and several potential mechanisms have been identified.

Acute pancreatitis, the most frequent hospitalization reason in internal medicine ward among gastrointestinal diseases, is burdened by high mortality rate. The disease manifests mainly in a mild form, but about 20-30% patients have a severe progress that requires intensive care. Patients presenting with acute pancreatitis should be clinically evaluated for organ failure signs and symptoms. Stratifying patients in the first days from symptoms onset is essential to determine therapy and care setting. The aim of our study is to evaluate prognostic factors for acute pancreatitis patients, hospitalized in internal medicine wards, and moreover, understanding the role of various prognostic scores validated in intensive care setting in predicting in-hospital mortality and/or admission to intensive care unit. We conducted a retrospective study enrolling all patients with diagnosis of acute pancreatitis admitted took an internal medicine ward between January 2013 and May 2019. Adverse outcome was considered in-hospital mortality and/or admission to intensive care unit. In total, 146 patients (137 with positive outcome and 9 with adverse outcome) were enrolled. The median age was (67.89 ± 16.44), with a slight prevalence of male (55.1%) compared to female (44.9%). C protein reactive (p = 0.02), creatinine (p = 0.01), sodium (p = 0.05), and troponin I (p = 0.013) after 48 h were significantly increased in patients with adverse outcome. In our study, progression in SOFA score independently increases the probability of adverse outcome in patients hospitalized with acute pancreatitis. SOFA score > 5 is highly predictive of in-hospital mortality (O.R. 32.00; C.I. 6.73-152.5; p = 0.001) compared to other scores. The use of an easy tool, validated in intensive care setting such as SOFA score, might help to better stratify the risk of in-hospital mortality and/or clinical worsening in patients hospitalized with acute pancreatitis in internal medicine ward.

Background: Multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) are an emerging health problem with an important impact on clinical outcome in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and immunocompromised patients. Conversely, the role of MDRO colonization in Internal Medicine is less clear. The objective of our study is to evaluate the clinical impact (namely sepsis development, in-hospital and 30-days mortality, and re-hospitalization) of MDRO colonization in Internal Medicine. Methods: Patients admitted to our Internal Medicine Unit between January 2019 and March 2020 were potentially includible. Outcomes in patients with a positive rectal swab for MDRO (RS+) and in patients without a RS+ were compared. Results of the multivariate analyses were expressed as Odds Ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Results: In a cohort of 2147 patients, 77 patients with RS+ were consecutively identified; 377 patients with a rectal swab negative for MDRO were randomly selected from the same cohort (five for each patient with RS+). At the multivariate analysis, RS+ was associated with an increased risk of sepsis development during hospitalization (OR 4.18; 95% CI, 1.99–8.78) and with death or re-hospitalization at 30 days (OR 4.79; 95% CI, 2.79–8.23), whereas RS+ did not appear to be associated with death during hospitalization or need for ICU transfer. Conclusions: Our results suggest for the first time a prognostic role for RS+ in Internal Medicine. Thus, assessment of rectal swab at hospital admission appears useful even in this setting. However, larger prospective studies and a cost–benefit analysis are needed to confirm our preliminary findings.

Patients hospitalized in internal medicine are frequently malnourished or at risk for malnutrition. The aim of this study, conducted by the Federation of Associations of Hospital Internists (FADOI) and the Italian Society of Artificial Nutrition and Metabolism (SINPE) was to assess the nutritional management of internal medicine inpatients in Italy, to identify critical issues and formulate practical proposals to improve nutritional treatment. From February to April 2021, FADOI and SINPE conducted a national web-based survey, including a 13 multiple-choice item questionnaire related to three key areas: screening and assessment of malnutrition and associated/overlapping sarcopenia and dysphagia; specialist consultations; and management of nutritional support. Responding to the questionnaire were 266 physicians among FADOI members (10.76%). Screening for malnutrition is performed with validated tests, within standardized care pathways, or routinely, only by 22% of participants. Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria for diagnosis of malnutrition are little used (20%). Screening for sarcopenia was insufficient as the systematic use of assessment tools (handgrip/chair test) was minimal (3%). Screening for dysphagia is not a routine procedure for at-risk patients according to 33% of participants. Systematic involvement of clinical nutrition services/units in the management of malnourished/sarcopenic patients was reported by only 17% of internists. To overcome the critical issues that emerged from the present study, FADOI and SINPE experts proposed practical solutions to promote the application of the most recent guidelines and to improve awareness and sensitivity to nutritional management in internal medicine real-life settings.