Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) is the leading cause of cardiovascular death in dialysis patients. This review discusses potential underlying arrhythmic mechanisms of SCD in the dialysis population. It examines recent evidence from studies using implantable loop recorders and from electrophysiological studies in experimental animal models of chronic kidney disease. The review summarizes advances in the field of non-invasive electrophysiology for risk prediction in dialysis patients focusing on the predictive value of the QRS-T angle and of the assessments of autonomic imbalance by means of heart rate variability analysis. Future research directions in non-invasive electrophysiology are identified to advance the understanding of the arrhythmic mechanisms. A suggestion is made of incorporation of non-invasive electrophysiology procedures into clinical practice. Key Concepts: – Large prospective studies in dialysis patients with continuous ECG monitoring are required to clarify the underlying arrhythmic mechanisms of SCD in dialysis patients. – Obstructive sleep apnoea may be associated with brady-arrhythmias in dialysis patients. Studies are needed to elucidate the burden and impact of sleeping disorders on arrhythmic complications in dialysis patients. – The QRS-T angle has the potential to be used as a descriptor of uremic cardiomyopathy. – The QRS-T angle can be calculated from routine collected surface ECGs. Multicenter collaboration is required to establish best methodological approach and normal values. – Heart Rate Variability provides indirect assessment of cardiac modulation that may be relevant for cardiac risk prediction in dialysis patients. Short-term recordings with autonomic provocations are likely to overcome the limitations of out of hospital 24-h recordings and should be prospectively assessed.
25 June 2018 in Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
Introduction: Mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients is high with significant proportion attributed to fatal arrhythmias. In a pilot study, we showed that intradialytic electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring can yield stable profiles of selected repolarisation descriptors and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters. This study investigated the relationship of these ECG markers with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and mortality.Methods: Continuous ECGs were obtained during HD and repeated five times at 2‐week intervals. The QRS‐T angle calculated as Total Cosine R to T (TCRT) and T‐wave morphology dispersion (TMD) were calculated in overlapping 10 s ECG segments. High‐ (HF) and low (LF)‐frequency components and the LF/HF ratio of HRV were calculated every 5 min. These indices were averaged during the first hour of dialysis and subsequently overall recordings in each subject.Results: All ECG parameters were available in 72 patients aged 61 ± 15, 23 (31.9%) females and 26 (36.1%) diabetics. After a median follow up of 54.8 months, 16 patients died, 20 were transplanted, and 9 suffered MACE. TCRT (in degrees) was higher and LF/HF was lower in patients who died compared to survivors (112 ± 30 vs. 73 ± 35, p = 0.000 and 0.222 ± 0.418 vs. 0.401 ± 0.274, p = 0.000, respectively) and in MACE positive compared to negative (117 ± 40 vs. 77 ± 34, p = 0.017 and 0.125 ± 0.333 vs.0.401 ± 0.274, p = 0.007 respectively). In multivariate Cox regression analysis of mortality risk adjusted for age, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease, TCRT and LF/HF remained significant predictors (p < 0.05).Conclusion: QRS‐T angle and HRV may serve risk assessment in future prospective studies in HD patients.
Background: The advancement of COVID-19 vaccination programs globally has been viewed as an integral strategy to reduce both the number of COVID-19 cases and consequential complications of COVID-19, particularly for high-risk patient groups. There are limited data on the antibody response and protection from disease infection and severity in patients requiring hemodialysis (HD) following COVID-19 vaccination during the Delta and Omicron variant predominance. We conducted a study aiming to evaluate humoral immunity derived from two different COVID-19 vaccines administered to our in-centre HD population and investigated the characteristics of breakthrough COVID-19 infections occurring post-vaccination within this population. Methods: This is a prospective observational study including patients receiving HD at Salford Royal Hospital. The first and second doses of COVID-19 vaccinations (Pfizer BioNTech BNT162b2 or Oxford AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) were administered to this patient cohort since January 2021. The incidence of any breakthrough COVID-19 infections occurring in double vaccinated patients between 1 April 2021 and 15 January 2022 was recorded. Patients were screened weekly with nasal and pharyngeal nasopharyngeal swabs for real-time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) for COVID-19, whilst SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing was performed alongside monthly routine HD bloods. Results: Four hundred eleven patients receiving HD were included in this study, of which 170 of 178 patients (95.5%) with available data on antibody status following two doses of the Pfizer BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccination had detectable antibody response, whilst this was the case for 97 of 101 patients (96.1%) who received two doses of the Oxford AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. For 12 seronegative patients who received a booster vaccine (third dose), nine seroconverted, while one remained negative and two were not tested. No statistically significant differences were observed with regards to antibody status between those receiving Pfizer BioNTech BNT162b2 and Oxford AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines. Sixty-three of 353 patients with two doses of COVID-19 vaccination had breakthrough COVID-19 infection (40 during Delta and 23 during Omicron variant predominance). Of the 40 patients during the delta period, five were admitted into hospital and there were two reported deaths due to COVID-19-related illness. There were no COVID-19 associated hospitalizations or deaths during the Omicron variant predominance. Conclusions: The vast majority of HD patients who received two doses of the Pfizer BioNTech BNT162b2 or Oxford AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinations developed detectable antibody responses. Our results support the value of booster vaccination with mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine in HD patients and highlight the need for ongoing surveillance programmes with rRT-PCR and antibody testing for timely detection of positive cases.
Background: Cardiovascular disease is the commonest cause of death in hemodialysis (HD) patients but accurate risk prediction is lacking. The spatial QRS – T angle is a promising electrophysiological marker for sudden cardiac death risk stratification. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of spatial QRS-T angle derived from standard 12 lead electrocardiograms (ECG) and its association with echocardiographic parameters in HD patients. Methods: This prospective study of 178 prevalent HD patients (aged 67 ± 14 years, 72% men) collected ECG and echocardiographic data on an annual basis. Baseline echocardiograms at study entry were used for cross-sectional comparisons with ECGs. Study endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The QRS – T angle was calculated from standard 10-s ECG as the total cosine R to T (TCRT) using singular value decomposition and expressed in degrees. TCRT above 100∘ was defined as abnormal. Results: During a follow-up period of 36 ± 19 months, 74 patients died, including 17 cardiac deaths, and 54 suffered from MACE. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, QRS-T angle by TCRT at baseline was associated with increased cardiovascular mortality both as a continuous value and dichotomized below or above 100∘ (HR 1.016, p = 0.029, CI: 1.002–1.030 and HR 3.506, CI: 1.118–10.995, p = 0.031 respectively) and with MACE dichotomized at 100∘ (HR 1.902, CI: 1.046–3.459; p = 0.035). In multivariate regression analysis including baseline parameters, echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) was significantly correlated with TCRT (F 9.648, r2 = 0.192, standardized β = 0.331, unstandardized β = 3.567, t = 4.4429, CI: 1.976–5.157, p < 0.001). Conclusion: TCRT correlates with GLS and is independently associated with cardiac deaths and MACE in HD patients.