Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: The use of the internet as a source of information has grown exponentially in the last decade. YouTube is currently the second most visited website and a major online educational resource for medical students. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, accuracy and attractiveness of the information acquired from YouTube videos about two central concepts in immunology. Methods: YouTube videos posted prior to August 27, 2018 were searched using selected keywords related to either antigen presentation or immunoglobulin gene rearrangement. Video characteristics were recorded and the Video Power Index was calculated. Videos were assessed using five validated scoring systems: Understandability and Attractiveness, reliability, Content and Comprehensiveness, Global Quality Score and a subjective score. Videos were categorized by educational usefulness and by source. Results: A total of 82 videos about antigen presentation and 70 about immunoglobulin gene rearrangement were analyzed. Videos had a mean Understandability and Attractiveness score of 6,57/8 and 5,84/8, Content and Comprehensiveness score of 9,84/20 and 5,84/20, reliability score of 1,65/4 and 1,53/4, Global Quality Scale of 3,38/5 and 2,76/5, and subjective score of 2,00/3 and 2,00/3, respectively. The organized channels group tended to have the highest Video Power Index and Global Quality Scale. Conclusions: YouTube can provide medical students with some useful information about immunology, although content-wise it cannot substitute textbooks and academic courses. Students and teachers should be aware of the educational quality of available videos if they intend to use them in the context of blended learning.