David Nisbet

Prof. David Nisbet

University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2019 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHChao Hu
Chao Hu
DADeepu Ashok
Deepu Ashok
David NisbetDavid Nisbet
David Nisbet
VGVini Gautam
Vini Gautam

1 June 2021 in Chemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMahdiar Taheri
Mahdiar Taheri
DADeepu Ashok
Deepu Ashok
TSTanuka Sen
Tanuka Sen
TET. Gabriel Enge
T. Gabriel Enge
NVNaresh K. Verma
Naresh K. Verma
TTTakuya Tsuzuki
Takuya Tsuzuki

12 December 2008 in Journal of Biomaterials Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David NisbetDavid Nisbet
David Nisbet
JFJ.S. Forsythe
J.S. Forsythe
WSW. Shen
W. Shen
DFDavid Finkelstein
David Finkelstein
MHM.K. Horne
M.K. Horne
Electrospinning has been employed extensively in tissue engineering to generate nanofibrous scaffolds from either natural or synthetic biodegradable polymers to simulate the cellular microenvironment. Electrospinning rapidly produces fibers of the nanolength scale and the process offers many opportunities to tailor the physical, chemical, and biological properties of a material for specific applications and cellular environments. There is growing evidence that nanofibers amplify certain biological responses such as contact guidance and differentiation, however this has not been fully exploited in tissue engineering. This review addresses the cellular interactions with electrospun scaffolds, with particular focus on neural, bone, cartilage, and vascular tissue regeneration. Some aspects of scaffold design, including architectural properties, surface functionalization and materials selection are also addressed.

20 May 2016 in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WWWilliam S. Y. Wong
William S. Y. Wong
ZSZbigniew H. Stachurski
Zbigniew H. Stachurski
David NisbetDavid Nisbet
David Nisbet
ATAntonio Tricoli
Antonio Tricoli

1 March 2014 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XCX.B. Chen
X.B. Chen
David NisbetDavid Nisbet
David Nisbet
RLR.W. Li
R.W. Li
PSP.N. Smith
P.N. Smith
TAT.B. Abbott
T.B. Abbott
NBNick Birbilis
Nick Birbilis

1 June 2010 in Stem Cells and Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMalcolm K. Horne
Malcolm K. Horne
David NisbetDavid Nisbet
David Nisbet
JFJohn S. Forsythe
John S. Forsythe
CPClare L. Parish
Clare L. Parish
Attempts to repair the central nervous system damaged as a result of trauma or disease will depend on the ability to restore the appropriate neuronal connectivity. This will rely on establishing appropriate chemical and physical environments for supporting neural cells and their processes and in this regard, engineering of biomaterials is of increasing interest. It will be important to understand how cells behave on these biomaterials in vitro, prior to future in vivo application. We reveal that modification of 3-dimensional (3D) electrospun poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) nanofiber scaffolds by fiber alignment and aminolysation is superior to classical 2-dimensional (2D) culture-ware in promoting in vitro proliferation and differentiation of cortical cells. Many studies have examined the importance of exogenous soluble factors to promote cell fate specification. Here, we demonstrate that tethering the neurotrophin, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), onto modified nanofibers is superior to culturing in the presence of soluble BDNF. Functional immobilization of BDNF to polymer nanofibers enhances neural stem cell (NSC) proliferation and directs cell fate toward neuronal and oligodendrocyte specification, essential for neural tissue repair. These findings indicate that modified PCL nanofibrous 3D scaffolds are capable of supporting NSCs and their derivatives and may present a new avenue for encouraging neural repair in the future.