Akhila Reddy

Dr. Akhila Reddy

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 May 2014 in The Oncologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAkhila Reddy
Akhila Reddy
MCMaxine de la Cruz
Maxine de la Cruz
EREden Mae Rodriguez
Eden Mae Rodriguez
JTJessica Thames
Jessica Thames
JWJimin Wu
Jimin Wu
EBEduardo Bruera
Eduardo Bruera
Purpose.: Improper storage, use, and disposal of prescribed opioids can lead to diversion or accidental poisoning. Our objective was to determine the patterns of storage, utilization, and disposal of opioids among cancer outpatients. Patients and Methods.: We surveyed 300 adult cancer outpatients receiving opioids in our supportive care center and collected information regarding opioid use, storage, and disposal, along with scores on the CAGE (cut down, annoyed, guilty, eye-opener) alcoholism screening questionnaire. Unsafe use was defined as sharing or losing opioids; unsafe storage was defined as storing opioids in plain sight. Results.: The median age was 57 years. CAGE was positive in 58 of 300 patients (19%), and 26 (9%) had a history of illicit drug use. Fifty-six (19%) stored opioids in plain sight, 208 (69%) kept opioids hidden but unlocked, and only 28 (9%) locked their opioids. CAGE-positive patients (p = .007) and those with a history of illicit drug use (p = .0002) or smoking (p = .03) were more likely to lock their opioids. Seventy-eight (26%) reported unsafe use by sharing (9%) or losing (17%) their opioids. Patients who were never married or single (odds ratio: 2.92; 95% confidence interval: 1.48–5.77; p = .006), were CAGE positive (40% vs. 21%; p = .003), or had a history of illicit drug use (42% vs. 23%; p = .031) were more likely to use opioids unsafely. Overall, 223 of 300 patients (74%) were unaware of proper opioid disposal methods, and 138 (46%) had unused opioids at home. Conclusion.: A large proportion of cancer patients improperly and unsafely use, store, and dispose of opioids, highlighting the need for establishment of easily accessed patient education and drug take-back programs.

1 March 2019 in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMary Lynn McPherson
Mary Lynn McPherson
KWKathryn A. Walker
Kathryn A. Walker
MDMellar P. Davis
Mellar P. Davis
EBEduardo Bruera
Eduardo Bruera
ARAkhila Reddy
Akhila Reddy
RCRoger Chou
Roger Chou

20 February 2020 in Current Treatment Options in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJaya Amaram-Davila
Jaya Amaram-Davila
MDMellar Davis
Mellar Davis
ARAkhila Reddy
Akhila Reddy

8 April 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMichael Jay Tang
Michael Jay Tang
ARAkhila Reddy
Akhila Reddy
The landscape of healthcare delivery has considerably changed due to the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This is nowhere more evident than in the care of advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care. This population is susceptible to the severe complications of COVID-19, and immediate measures had to be taken to ensure their safety. Thus, the adoption of telemedicine as a health care delivery model emerged. This model provides many benefits, such as improved access to care while maintaining social distancing; however, there exist challenges to this model, including health care disparities, reimbursement, and monitoring of opioids in high-risk populations. This narrative review provides an overview of the unique benefits and barriers of telemedicine in palliative care patients.

1 September 2017 in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAkhila Reddy
Akhila Reddy
MVMarieberta Vidal
Marieberta Vidal
SSSaneese Stephen
Saneese Stephen
KBKaren Baumgartner
Karen Baumgartner
SDSara Dost
Sara Dost
EBEduardo Bruera
Eduardo Bruera

13 April 2016 in Palliative and Supportive Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJulio Silvestre
Julio Silvestre
ARAkhila Reddy
Akhila Reddy
MCMaxine de la Cruz
Maxine de la Cruz
JWJimin Wu
Jimin Wu
DLDiane Liu
Diane Liu
KTKnox H. Todd
Knox H. Todd
Objective: Approximately 75% of prescription opioid abusers obtain the drug from an acquaintance, which may be a consequence of improper opioid storage, use, disposal, and lack of patient education. We aimed to determine the opioid storage, use, and disposal patterns in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) of a comprehensive cancer center.Method: We surveyed 113 patients receiving opioids for at least 2 months upon presenting to the ED and collected information regarding opioid use, storage, and disposal. Unsafe storage was defined as storing opioids in plain sight, and unsafe use was defined as sharing or losing opioids.Results: The median age was 53 years, 55% were female, 64% were white, and 86% had advanced cancer. Of those surveyed, 36% stored opioids in plain sight, 53% kept them hidden but unlocked, and only 15% locked their opioids. However, 73% agreed that they would use a lockbox if given one. Patients who reported that others had asked them for their pain medications (p= 0.004) and those who would use a lockbox if given one (p= 0.019) were more likely to keep them locked. Some 13 patients (12%) used opioids unsafely by either sharing (5%) or losing (8%) them. Patients who reported being prescribed more pain pills than required (p= 0.032) were more likely to practice unsafe use. Most (78%) were unaware of proper opioid disposal methods, 6% believed they were prescribed more medication than required, and 67% had unused opioids at home. Only 13% previously received education about safe disposal of opioids. Overall, 77% (87) of patients reported unsafe storage, unsafe use, or possessed unused opioids at home.Significance of Results: Many cancer patients presenting to the ED improperly and unsafely store, use, or dispose of opioids, thus highlighting a need to investigate the impact of patient education on such practices.