Early detection through screening is critical for reducing gastric cancer (GC) mortality. However, in most high-prevalence regions, large-scale screening remains challenging due to limited resources, low compliance and suboptimal detection rate of upper endoscopic screening. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more efficient screening protocols. Noncontrast computed tomography (CT), routinely performed for clinical purposes, presents a promising avenue for large-scale designed or opportunistic screening. Here we developed the Gastric Cancer Risk Assessment Procedure with Artificial Intelligence (GRAPE), leveraging noncontrast CT and deep learning to identify GC. Our study comprised three phases. First, we developed GRAPE using a cohort from 2 centers in China (3,470 GC and 3,250 non-GC cases) and validated its performance on an internal validation set (1,298 cases, area under curve = 0.970) and an independent external cohort from 16 centers (18,160 cases, area under curve = 0.927). Subgroup analysis showed that the detection rate of GRAPE increased with advancing T stage but was independent of tumor location. Next, we compared the interpretations of GRAPE with those of radiologists and assessed its potential in assisting diagnostic interpretation. Reader studies demonstrated that GRAPE significantly outperformed radiologists, improving sensitivity by 21.8% and specificity by 14.0%, particularly in early-stage GC. Finally, we evaluated GRAPE in real-world opportunistic screening using 78,593 consecutive noncontrast CT scans from a comprehensive cancer center and 2 independent regional hospitals. GRAPE identified persons at high risk with GC detection rates of 24.5% and 17.7% in 2 regional hospitals, with 23.2% and 26.8% of detected cases in T1/T2 stage. Additionally, GRAPE detected GC cases that radiologists had initially missed, enabling earlier diagnosis of GC during follow-up for other diseases. In conclusion, GRAPE demonstrates strong potential for large-scale GC screening, offering a feasible and effective approach for early detection. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT06614179 .

An evaluation of nutrition intervention during radiation therapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma An evaluation of nutrition intervention during radiation therapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Objective: To establish a radiomics model based on intratumoral and peritumoral features extracted from pre-treatment CT to predict the major pathological response (MPR) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.Methods: A total of 148 NSCLC patients who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy from two centers (SRRSH and ZCH) were retrospectively included. The SRRSH dataset (n=105) was used as the training and internal validation cohort. Radiomics features of intratumoral (T) and peritumoral regions (P1 = 0-5mm, P2 = 5-10mm, and P3 = 10-15mm) were extracted from pre-treatment CT. Intra- and inter- class correlation coefficients and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used to feature selection. Four single ROI models mentioned above and a combined radiomics (CR: T+P1+P2+P3) model were established by using machine learning algorithms. Clinical factors were selected to construct the combined radiomics-clinical (CRC) model, which was validated in the external center ZCH (n=43). The performance of the models was assessed by DeLong test, calibration curve and decision curve analysis.Results: Histopathological type was the only independent clinical risk factor. The model CR with eight selected radiomics features demonstrated a good predictive performance in the internal validation (AUC=0.810) and significantly improved than the model T (AUC=0.810 vs 0.619, p<0.05). The model CRC yielded the best predictive capability (AUC=0.814) and obtained satisfactory performance in the independent external test set (AUC=0.768, 95% CI: 0.62-0.91).Conclusion: We established a CRC model that incorporates intratumoral and peritumoral features and histopathological type, providing an effective approach for selecting NSCLC patients suitable for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Introduction: The postoperative recurrence of gastric cancer (GC) has a significant impact on the overall prognosis of patients. Therefore, accurately predicting the postoperative recurrence of GC is crucial. Methods: This retrospective study gathered data from 2813 GC patients who underwent radical surgery between 2011 and 2017 at two medical centers. Follow-up was extended until May 2023, and cases were categorized as recurrent or nonrecurrent based on postoperative outcomes. Clinical pathological information and imaging data were collected for all patients. A new deep learning signature (DLS) was generated using pretreatment computed tomography images, based on a pretrained baseline (a customized Resnet50), for predicting postoperative recurrence. The deep learning fusion signature (DLFS) was created by combining the score of DLS with the weighted values of identified clinical features. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. Survival curves were plotted to investigate the differences between DLFS and prognosis. Results: In this study, 2813 patients with GC were recruited and allocated into training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. The DLFS was developed and assessed for its capability in predicting the risk of postoperative recurrence. The DLFS exhibited excellent performance with AUCs of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.809–0.858) in the training set, 0.831 (95% CI: 0.792–0.871) in the internal validation set, and 0.859 (95% CI: 0.806–0.912) in the external validation set, along with satisfactory calibration across all cohorts (P>0.05). Furthermore, the DLFS model significantly outperformed both the clinical model and DLS (P<0.05). High-risk recurrent patients exhibit a significantly poorer prognosis compared to low-risk recurrent patients (P<0.05). Conclusions: The integrated model developed in this study, focusing on GC patients undergoing radical surgery, accurately identifies cases at high-risk of postoperative recurrence and highlights the potential of DLFS as a prognostic factor for GC patients.

Background: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening is effective in reducing lung cancer mortality in smokers; however, the evidence in nonsmokers is scarce. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the participant rate and effectiveness of one-off LDCT screening for lung cancer among smokers and nonsmokers. Methods: A population-based prospective cohort study was performed to enroll participants aged between 40 and 74 years from 2013 to 2019 from 4 cities in Zhejiang Province, China. Participants who were evaluated as having a high risk of lung cancer from an established risk score model were recommended to undergo LDCT screening. Follow-up outcomes were retrieved on June 30, 2020. The uptake rate of LDCT screening for evaluated high-risk participants and the detection rate of early-stage lung cancer (stage 0-I) were calculated. The lung cancer incidence, lung cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality were compared between the screened and nonscreened groups. Results: At baseline, 62.56% (18,818/30,079) of smokers and 6% (5483/91,455) of nonsmokers were identified as high risk (P<.001), of whom 41.9% (7885/18,818) and 66.31% (3636/5483) underwent LDCT screening (P<.001), respectively. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 1100 lung cancer cases and 456 all-cause death cases (116 lung cancer death cases) were traced. The proportion of early-stage lung cancer among smokers was 60.3% (173/287), which was lower than the proportion of 80.3% (476/593) among nonsmokers (P<.001). Among smokers, a higher proportion was found in the screened group (72/106, 67.9%) than the nonscreened group (56/114, 49.1%; P=.005), whereas no significance was found (42/44, 96% vs 10/12, 83%; P=.20) among nonsmokers. Compared with participants who were not screened, LDCT screening in smokers significantly increased lung cancer incidence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.76; P=.007) but reduced lung cancer mortality (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.96; P=.04) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.69; P<.001). Among nonsmokers, no significant results were found for lung cancer incidence (P=.06), all-cause mortality (P=.89), and lung cancer mortality (P=.17). Conclusions: LDCT screening effectively reduces lung cancer and all-cause mortality among high-risk smokers. Further efforts to define high-risk populations and explore adequate lung cancer screening modalities for nonsmokers are needed.