Zhongtai He

Prof. Dr. Zhongtai He

Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 April 2018 in Journal of Earth Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Zhongtai HeZhongtai He
Zhongtai He
BMBaoqi Ma
Baoqi Ma
JLJianyu Long
Jianyu Long
JWJinyan Wang
Jinyan Wang
HZHao Zhang
Hao Zhang

29 August 2021 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKang Li
Kang Li
Yongsheng LiYongsheng Li
Yongsheng Li
PTPaul Tapponnier
Paul Tapponnier
XXXiwei Xu
Xiwei Xu
DLDewen Li
Dewen Li
Zhongtai HeZhongtai He
Zhongtai He
The accumulation and partitioning of crustal strain in central Tibet remain debated. July 23, 2020, Mw 6.4 earthquake in the Nima region (≈86.864°E/33.144°N) thus provides an opportunity to gain insight into local, ongoing deformation. Here, we use Sentinel‐1 SAR data to assess co‐seismic deformation during that earthquake, and nonlinear/linear inversions to determine the location and geometry of the source and the finite fault slip distribution. The results show that the maximum surface subsidence was ≈25 cm, the causative fault had a ≈N28°E strike and ≈48° dip eastwards, and that the largest normal slip, with a peak of ≈1.5 m, occurred between 5 and 10 km depths. Details of the earthquake surface rupture were derived from a UAV‐based field survey. At three distinct sites, the high‐resolution UAV images revealed discontinuous, ≈N35°E‐trending arrays of fresh en‐echelon cracks and ≤20 cm‐high, free‐faced normal scarps, along a ≈10 km‐long, ≈20 m‐wide zone following the ≈ vertically projected western limit of maximum interferometric synthetic aperture radar slip at depth. These results, consistent with an earthquake intensity distribution based on building damage inspection, show that 2020 earthquake only broke a short segment of the west Yibu Chaka normal fault, along the middle stretch of the 300 km‐long Riganpei Co‐Yibu Chaka‐Jiangai Zangbo fault zone. Regional Coulomb stress changes suggest that larger, Mw 7+ earthquakes should be expected on the geomorphologically more prominent, ≈50 km‐long normal faults bounding the east side of the Yibu Chaka lake pull‐apart, and on the 120 km‐long, sinistral Riganpei‐Co fault to the southwest.

1 September 2018 in Journal of Asian Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKuan Liang
Kuan Liang
CSChangbin Sun
Changbin Sun
BMBaoqi Ma
Baoqi Ma
QTQinjian Tian
Qinjian Tian
DLDewen Li
Dewen Li
Zhongtai HeZhongtai He
Zhongtai He

1 June 2020 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zhongtai HeZhongtai He
Zhongtai He
BMBaoqi Ma
Baoqi Ma
YHYanjun Hao
Yanjun Hao
JZJunxiang Zhao
Junxiang Zhao
JWJunyi Wang
Junyi Wang

26 October 2020 in Journal of Earth Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJunyi Wang
Junyi Wang
Zhongtai HeZhongtai He
Zhongtai He

1 March 2019 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKuan Liang
Kuan Liang
BMBaoqi Ma
Baoqi Ma
DLDewen Li
Dewen Li
QTQinjian Tian
Qinjian Tian
CSChangbin Sun
Changbin Sun
JWJinpeng Wang
Jinpeng Wang