Mariusz Siemiński

Prof. Mariusz Siemiński

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 August 2021 in Sleep Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Charles MorinCharles Morin
Charles Morin
BBBjørn Bjorvatn
Bjørn Bjorvatn
FCFrances Chung
Frances Chung
BHBrigitte Holzinger
Brigitte Holzinger
MPMarkku Partinen
Markku Partinen
CEColin A. Espie
Colin A. Espie

11 February 2017 in Sleep and Breathing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMariusz Siemiński
Mariusz Siemiński
JPJan Pyrzowski
Jan Pyrzowski
MPMarkku Partinen
Markku Partinen
Purpose Periodic limb movements in sleep (PLMS) are related to arousal, sympathetic activation, and increases in blood pressure (BP), but whether they are part of the arousal process or causative of it is unclear. Our objective was to assess the temporal distribution of arousal-related measures around PLMS. Methods Polysomnographic recordings of six patients with restless legs syndrome were analyzed. We analyzed 15 PLMS, plus three 5-s epochs before and after each movement, for every patient. Mean values per epoch of blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and electroencephalographic (EEG) power were calculated. For each patient, six 5-s epochs of undisturbed sleep were analyzed as controls. Results Alpha + beta EEG power, systolic BP, and HR were significantly increased following PLMS. The EEG power and HR increases were noticed in the first epoch after PLMS, whereas that of systolic BP was observed in the second and third epochs following a PLMS. No significant changes occurred in the epochs of undisturbed sleep. Conclusions The results suggest that PLMS are followed by arousal-related nervous system events. Given the high frequency of PLMS throughout the night, they could be a potential risk factor for nocturnal arrhythmias and hypertension, in addition to causing sleep deprivation.

23 June 2015 in Neurological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AYAri Ylikoski
Ari Ylikoski
KMKirsti Martikainen
Kirsti Martikainen
MSMariusz Siemiński
Mariusz Siemiński
MPMarkku Partinen
Markku Partinen

1 August 2015 in Sleep Medicine Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMariusz Siemiński
Mariusz Siemiński
JLJacek Losy
Jacek Losy
MPMarkku Partinen
Markku Partinen

10 November 2015 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJan Pyrzowski
Jan Pyrzowski
MSMariusz Siemiński
Mariusz Siemiński
ASAnna Sarnowska
Anna Sarnowska
JJJoanna Jedrzejczak
Joanna Jedrzejczak
WNWalenty M. Nyka
Walenty M. Nyka
The contemporary use of interictal scalp electroencephalography (EEG) in the context of focal epilepsy workup relies on the visual identification of interictal epileptiform discharges. The high-specificity performance of this marker comes, however, at a cost of only moderate sensitivity. Zero-crossing interval analysis is an alternative to Fourier analysis for the assessment of the rhythmic component of EEG signals. We applied this method to standard EEG recordings of 78 patients divided into 4 subgroups: temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and nonepileptic patients with headache. Interval-analysis based markers were capable of effectively discriminating patients with epilepsy from those in control subgroups (AUC~0.8) with diagnostic sensitivity potentially exceeding that of visual analysis. The identified putative epilepsy-specific markers were sensitive to the properties of the alpha rhythm and displayed weak or non-significant dependences on the number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) taken by the patients. Significant AED-related effects were concentrated in the theta interval range and an associated marker allowed for identification of patients on AED polytherapy (AUC~0.9). Interval analysis may thus, in perspective, increase the diagnostic yield of interictal scalp EEG. Our findings point to the possible existence of alpha rhythm abnormalities in patients with epilepsy.

1 September 2021 in Nature and Science of Sleep
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EFEirin Fränkl
Eirin Fränkl
Serena ScarpelliSerena Scarpelli
Serena Scarpelli
MNMichael R Nadorff
Michael R Nadorff
BBBjørn Bjorvatn
Bjørn Bjorvatn
Courtney BolstadCourtney Bolstad
Courtney Bolstad
BHBrigitte Holzinger
Brigitte Holzinger
Objective: Many have reported odd dreams during the pandemic. Given that dreams are associated with mental health, understanding these changes could provide crucial information about wellbeing during the pandemic. This study explored associations between COVID-19 and dream recall frequency (DRF), and related social, health, and mental health factors. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional web survey of 19,355 individuals in 14 countries from May to July 2020. We collected data on COVID-19, mental health, sleep and DRF during the pandemic. We performed McNemar Tests to compare low (< 3 nights per week) and high DRF (≥ 3 nights per week) before and during COVID-19 and to evaluate changes in sleep variables segmented by DRF. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare characteristics between low and high DRF. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between various independent variables and DRF. Results: Reports of high DRF during the pandemic were higher than before the pandemic (P< 0.001). Female gender (aOR=1.25, 95% CI 1.10– 1.41), nightmares (aOR=4.22, 95% CI 3.45– 5.17), sleep talking (aOR= 2.36, 1.73– 3.23), sleep maintenance problems (aOR=1.34, 95% CI 1.15– 1.56), symptoms of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD; aOR=1.24, 95% CI 1.09– 1.41) and repeated disturbing thoughts (posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms) were associated with high DRF. Age group 55– 64 years (aOR=0.69, 95% CI 0.58– 0.83) reported less high DRF than younger participants. Unadjusted OR showed associations between depression, anxiety, and DRF; however, in adjusted regression depression (aOR= 0.71, 0.59– 0.86) and anxiety (aOR=0.79, 95% CI 0.66– 0.94) were negatively associated with high DRF. Conclusion and Relevance: DRF was higher than pre-pandemic levels across four continents. DRF was associated with gender and parasomnias like nightmares and RBD symptoms, sleep maintenance problems, PTSD symptoms and negatively associated with depression and anxiety. The results implicate that COVID-19 is reflected in our dreams as an expression of the emotional intensity of the pandemic.