The human blood–brain barrier (BBB) represents the interface of microvasculature and the central nervous system, regulating the transport of nutrients and protecting the brain from external threats. To gain a deeper understanding of (patho)physiological processes affecting the BBB, sophisticated models mimicking the in vivo situation are required. Currently, most in vitro models are cultivated on stiff, semipermeable, and non-biodegradable Transwell^® membrane inserts, not adequately mimicking the complexity of the extracellular environment of the native human BBB. To overcome these disadvantages, we developed three-dimensional electrospun scaffolds resembling the natural structure of the human extracellular matrix. The polymer fibers of the scaffold imitate collagen fibrils of the human basement membrane, exhibiting excellent wettability and biomechanical properties, thus facilitating cell adhesion, proliferation, and migration. Cultivation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) on these scaffolds enabled the development of a physiological BBB phenotype monitored via the formation of tight junctions and validated by the paracellular permeability of sodium fluorescein, further accentuating the non-linearity of TEER and barrier permeability. The novel in vitro model of the BBB forms a tight endothelial barrier, offering a platform to study barrier functions in a (patho)physiologically relevant context.

The treatment of Parkinson’s disease has been moving into the focus of pharmaceutical development. Yet, the necessity for reliable model systems in the development phase has made research challenging and in vivo models necessary. We have established reliable, reproducible in vitro model systems to evaluate the binding and transport of dopamine-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease and put the results in context with comparable in vivo results. The in vitro models have provided similar results concerning the usability of the investigated nanoparticles as the previously used in vivo models and thus provide a good alternative in line with the 3R principles in pharmaceutical research.

In vitro model systems of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) play an essential role in pharmacological research, specifically during the development and preclinical evaluation of new drug candidates. Within the past decade, the trend in research and further development has moved away from models based on primary cells of animal origin towards differentiated models derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSs). However, this logical progression towards human model systems from renewable cell sources opens up questions about the transferability of results generated in the primary cell models. In this study, we have evaluated both models with identical experimental parameters and achieved a directly comparable characterisation showing no significant differences in protein expression or permeability even though the achieved transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) values showed significant differences. In the course of this investigation, we also determined a significant deviation of both model systems from the in vivo BBB circumstances, specifically concerning the presence or absence of serum proteins in the culture media. Thus, we have further evaluated both systems when confronted with an in vivo-like distribution of serum and found a notable improvement in the differential permeability of hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds in the hiPS-derived BBB model. We then transferred this model into a microfluidic setup while maintaining the differential serum distribution and evaluated the permeability coefficients, which showed good comparability with values in the literature. Therefore, we have developed a microfluidic hiPS-based BBB model with characteristics comparable to the established primary cell-based model.