Tracey Muir

Dr. Tracey Muir


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 April 2019 in Distance Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TMTracey Muir
Tracey Muir
NMNaomi Milthorpe
Naomi Milthorpe
CSCathy Stone
Cathy Stone
JDJanet Dyment
Janet Dyment
EFElizabeth Freeman
Elizabeth Freeman
BHBelinda Hopwood
Belinda Hopwood
Although there is ample research into student engagement in online learning, much of this investigates the student experience through surveys administered at a fixed point in time, usually at the exit point of a single unit of study or course. The study described in this paper, by contrast, aimed to understand online student engagement over a whole semester, guided by two overarching questions: What factors impact students’ engagement over a semester? What factors account for fluctuation in engagement levels over time? This paper presents results from weekly feedback on online education students’ engagement over the length of one semester at a regional Australian university. It also chronicles in more depth the experiences of one student across the same semester. The findings offer longitudinal accounts of student engagement, demonstrating that levels of engagement fluctuate and are influenced by a variety of factors.

17 June 2022 in Education Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMTracey Muir
Tracey Muir
YWYanjun Wang
Yanjun Wang
ATAllison Trimble
Allison Trimble
Casey MainsbridgeCasey Mainsbridge
Casey Mainsbridge
TDTracy Douglas
Tracy Douglas
The COVID-19 outbreak in late 2019 required a complete shift to online learning across all educational institutions, including universities. The rapid transition to online learning globally meant that many educators were suddenly tasked with adapting their classroom-based pedagogy to the online space. While this was undoubtedly challenging for teachers and students, it also opened up possibilities for reimagining the delivery of content, along with creating increased access for students who had barriers for studying remotely before the impact of COVID-19. The study discussed in this paper examines the experiences of students studying at a regional Australian university that already offered online courses, and whose instructors were already using a diverse range of online delivery tools. Specifically, the study sought to investigate how instructors used interactive strategies to promote student engagement, and how the interaction between learner and content influences student engagement. With research showing that online students typically have higher attrition rates than their on-campus counterparts, engagement has been identified as an important factor in online learning. Online interaction in particular is considered to be instrumental in influencing student engagement and positively impacting student satisfaction, persistence, and academic performance. Data collected from interviews conducted with two different cohorts of students, studying two different courses (mathematics education and Chinese language) at the same university, demonstrated ways instructors utilised interactive online pedagogies to engage students with potentially challenging course content. The study has implications for online educators who are looking for ways to adapt their on-campus courses to online delivery, with a focus on engaging and maintaining online students’ interest and ongoing participation in their courses.

18 December 2015 in Mathematics Education Research Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TMTracey Muir
Tracey Muir
VGVince Geiger
Vince Geiger

1 July 2019 in Australian and International Journal of Rural Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCathy Stone
Cathy Stone
EFElizabeth Freeman
Elizabeth Freeman
JDJanet Dyment
Janet Dyment
TMTracey Muir
Tracey Muir
NMNaomi Milthorpe
Naomi Milthorpe
Online study is generally associated with the terms flexible and flexibility. Many students choose to study online specifically for the flexibility that is offered, hoping they can combine their studies with multiple other responsibilities in their lives. For students living in regional and rural areas, such flexibility can be even more important, given the additional difficulties they face in accessing campus facilities. While a flexible learning environment has the potential to contribute positively towards equity in higher education, this equity can be compromised when university policies and processes that have been designed for on-campus students are applied equally to online students. This paper examines the experiences of a group of regional and rural Education students who have chosen to study online, to a large extent because of online learning's promised flexibility. Their experiences demonstrate that equal treatment may in fact undermine flexibility and result in an inequitable student experience.

1 January 2008 in The Journal of Mathematical Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TMTracey Muir
Tracey Muir
KBKim Beswick
Kim Beswick
JWJohn Williamson
John Williamson

15 November 2019 in Learning Environments Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CDCraig Deed
Craig Deed
DBDamian Blake
Damian Blake
JHJoanne Henriksen
Joanne Henriksen
AMAmanda Mooney
Amanda Mooney
VPVaughan Prain
Vaughan Prain
DFDoug Fingland
Doug Fingland