Genevieve Albouy

Dr. Genevieve Albouy

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 August 2007 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Manuel SchabusManuel Schabus
Manuel Schabus
TDThien Thanh Dang-Vu
Thien Thanh Dang-Vu
GAGenevieve Albouy
Genevieve Albouy
EBE. Balteau
E. Balteau
MBM. Boly
M. Boly
PMP. Maquet
P. Maquet
In humans, some evidence suggests that there are two different types of spindles during sleep, which differ by their scalp topography and possibly some aspects of their regulation. To test for the existence of two different spindle types, we characterized the activity associated with slow (11–13 Hz) and fast (13–15 Hz) spindles, identified as discrete events during non-rapid eye movement sleep, in non-sleep-deprived human volunteers, using simultaneous electroencephalography and functional MRI. An activation pattern common to both spindle types involved the thalami, paralimbic areas (anterior cingulate and insular cortices), and superior temporal gyri. No thalamic difference was detected in the direct comparison between slow and fast spindles although some thalamic areas were preferentially activated in relation to either spindle type. Beyond the common activation pattern, the increases in cortical activity differed significantly between the two spindle types. Slow spindles were associated with increased activity in the superior frontal gyrus. In contrast, fast spindles recruited a set of cortical regions involved in sensorimotor processing, as well as the mesial frontal cortex and hippocampus. The recruitment of partially segregated cortical networks for slow and fast spindles further supports the existence of two spindle types during human non-rapid eye movement sleep, with potentially different functional significance.

1 April 2008 in Neuron
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GAGenevieve Albouy
Genevieve Albouy
VSVirginie Sterpenich
Virginie Sterpenich
EBEvelyne Balteau
Evelyne Balteau
Gilles VandewalleGilles Vandewalle
Gilles Vandewalle
MDMartin Desseilles
Martin Desseilles
PMPierre Maquet
Pierre Maquet

30 September 2008 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TDThien Thanh Dang-Vu
Thien Thanh Dang-Vu
Manuel SchabusManuel Schabus
Manuel Schabus
MDMartin Desseilles
Martin Desseilles
GAGenevieve Albouy
Genevieve Albouy
MBMélanie Boly
Mélanie Boly
PMPierre Maquet
Pierre Maquet
Slow wave sleep (SWS) is associated with spontaneous brain oscillations that are thought to participate in sleep homeostasis and to support the processing of information related to the experiences of the previous awake period. At the cellular level, during SWS, a slow oscillation (140 μV) and delta waves (75–140 μV) during SWS in 14 non-sleep-deprived normal human volunteers. Significant increases in activity were associated with these waves in several cortical areas, including the inferior frontal, medial prefrontal, precuneus, and posterior cingulate areas. Compared with baseline activity, slow waves are associated with significant activity in the parahippocampal gyrus, cerebellum, and brainstem, whereas delta waves are related to frontal responses. No decrease in activity was observed. This study demonstrates that SWS is not a state of brain quiescence, but rather is an active state during which brain activity is consistently synchronized to the slow oscillation in specific cerebral regions. The partial overlap between the response pattern related to SWS waves and the waking default mode network is consistent with the fascinating hypothesis that brain responses synchronized by the slow oscillation restore microwake-like activity patterns that facilitate neuronal interactions.

20 November 2007 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSteffen Gais
Steffen Gais
GAGenevieve Albouy
Genevieve Albouy
MBMélanie Boly
Mélanie Boly
TDThien Thanh Dang-Vu
Thien Thanh Dang-Vu
ADAnnabelle Darsaud
Annabelle Darsaud
Philippe PeigneuxPhilippe Peigneux
Philippe Peigneux
After encoding, memory traces are initially fragile and have to be reinforced to become permanent. The initial steps of this process occur at a cellular level within minutes or hours. Besides this rapid synaptic consolidation, systems consolidation occurs within a time frame of days to years. For declarative memory, the latter is presumed to rely on an interaction between different brain regions, in particular the hippocampus and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Specifically, sleep has been proposed to provide a setting that supports such systems consolidation processes, leading to a transfer and perhaps transformation of memories. Using functional MRI, we show that postlearning sleep enhances hippocampal responses during recall of word pairs 48 h after learning, indicating intrahippocampal memory processing during sleep. At the same time, sleep induces a memory-related functional connectivity between the hippocampus and the mPFC. Six months after learning, memories activated the mPFC more strongly when they were encoded before sleep, showing that sleep leads to long-lasting changes in the representation of memories on a systems level.

28 February 2011 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OCOlivier Collignon
Olivier Collignon
Gilles VandewalleGilles Vandewalle
Gilles Vandewalle
PVPatrice Voss
Patrice Voss
GAGenevieve Albouy
Genevieve Albouy
GCGeneviève Charbonneau
Geneviève Charbonneau
FLFranco Lepore
Franco Lepore
The study of the congenitally blind (CB) represents a unique opportunity to explore experience-dependant plasticity in a sensory region deprived of its natural inputs since birth. Although several studies have shown occipital regions of CB to be involved in nonvisual processing, whether the functional organization of the visual cortex observed in sighted individuals (SI) is maintained in the rewired occipital regions of the blind has only been recently investigated. In the present functional MRI study, we compared the brain activity of CB and SI processing either the spatial or the pitch properties of sounds carrying information in both domains (i.e., the same sounds were used in both tasks), using an adaptive procedure specifically designed to adjust for performance level. In addition to showing a substantial recruitment of the occipital cortex for sound processing in CB, we also demonstrate that auditory–spatial processing mainly recruits the right cuneus and the right middle occipital gyrus, two regions of the dorsal occipital stream known to be involved in visuospatial/motion processing in SI. Moreover, functional connectivity analyses revealed that these reorganized occipital regions are part of an extensive brain network including regions known to underlie audiovisual spatial abilities (i.e., intraparietal sulcus, superior frontal gyrus). We conclude that some regions of the right dorsal occipital stream do not require visual experience to develop a specialization for the processing of spatial information and to be functionally integrated in a preexisting brain network dedicated to this ability.

8 August 2013 in Hippocampus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GAGenevieve Albouy
Genevieve Albouy
BKBradley R. King
Bradley R. King
PMPierre Maquet
Pierre Maquet
JDJulien Doyon
Julien Doyon
While several models of memory consolidation have previously associated hippocampal activity with declarative memory, there is now increasing evidence that the hippocampus also plays a crucial role in procedural memory. Here, we review recent human functional neuroimaging studies demonstrating that the hippocampus is involved in the acquisition and sleep‐related consolidation of procedural memories, and motor sequence‐based skills in particular. More specifically, we present evidence that hippocampal activity and its functional interactions with other brain structures, particularly competition with the striatum, contribute to initial learning of sequential motor behavior. Interestingly, these early cerebral representations in the hippocampus and striatum, which may interact through the prefrontal cortex, can even predict subsequent sleep‐related memory consolidation processes. We propose that sleep can reorganize the activity within, as well as the functional interactions between, these structures, ultimately favoring overnight performance enhancement. Finally, we conclude by offering insights into the respective roles of these structures in procedural memory consolidation processes. We argue that, in the context of motor sequence memory consolidation, the hippocampal system triggers subsequent sleep‐dependent performance enhancement whereas the striatal system is involved in the maintenance of the motor behavior over time.