The use of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) is showing early promising overall response rates in heavily pretreated patients. Infectious complications related to the use of BsAbs are not well described. We conducted a pooled analysis that included all single-agent BsAbs used in MM with no prior use of different BsAbs. A total of 1185 patients with MM were treated with a BsAb in the studied period (71.6% of the patients treated with an agent targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA). Pooled median follow-up was short at 6.1 months (7.5 vs 5.2 months for BCMA vs non-BCMA BsAbs, respectively). Adverse events of interest included all grade neutropenia in 38.6%, all grade infections in 50% (n = 542/1083), all grade cytokine release syndrome in 59.6% (n = 706/1185), grade III/IV neutropenia in 34.8% (n = 372/1068), grade III/IV infections in 24.5% (n = 272/1110), grade III/IV pneumonia in 10% (n = 52.4/506), and grade III/IV coronavirus disease 2019 in 11.4% (n = 45.4/395) of the patients. Non-BCMA–targeted BsAbs were associated with lower grade III/IV neutropenia (25.3% vs 39.2%) and lower grade III/IV infections (11.9% vs 30%) when compared with BCMA-targeted BsAbs. Hypogammaglobulinemia was reported in 4 studies, with a prevalence of 75.3% (n = 256/340) of the patients, with IV immunoglobulin used in 48% (n = 123/256) of them. Death was reported in 110 patients, of which 28 (25.5%) were reported to be secondary to infections. Certain precautions should be used when using BsAbs to mitigate the risk and/or identify and treat infections promptly.

The objective of our study was to report real-world data on the safety and efficacy of standard-of-care teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study and included all consecutive patients that received at least one dose of teclistamab up until August 2023. One hundred and ten patients were included, of whom, 86% had triple-class refractory disease, 76% penta-refractory disease, and 35% had prior exposure to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting therapies. The overall response rate (ORR) in our cohort was 62%, with a ≥ very good partial remission (VGPR) rate of 51%. The ORR in patients with and without prior BCMA-targeted therapies was 54% vs 67%, respectively (p = 0.23). At a median follow-up of 3.5 months (range, 0.39–10.92), the estimated 3 month and 6 month progression free survival (PFS) was 57% (95% CI, 48%, 68%) and 52% (95% CI, 42%, 64%) respectively. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was 56% and 11% respectively, with grade ≥3 CRS and ICANS noted in 3.5% and 4.6% of patients respectively. 78 unique infections were diagnosed in 44 patients, with the incidence of all-grade and grade ≥3 infections being 40% vs 26% respectively. Primary prophylaxis with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was associated with a significantly lower infection risk on multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; 95% CI 0.17, 0.64; p = 0.001).

Low participation of Black Americans in cancer clinical trials is a well-established predicament. Many factors resulted in this current dilemma with racism being the fundamental unit. Here, we discuss some current challenges and proposed solutions to help in increasing the enrollment of Black Americans in cancer clinical trials. We suggest implementing the least acceptable race-specific percentage as a new bar that registrational clinical trials need to pass before cancer drugs approval. Clinical trials will continue to draw the future of cancer therapeutics in which we believe that a prompt improvement of Black Americans participation is warranted.

Outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have improved over the past decades.¹ However, most patients will still relapse and require multiple lines of subsequent therapy. Patients with triple-class (proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody) refractory disease have a particularly bleak outcome.² The use of chimeric antigen receptor–T cell (CAR-T) therapy and bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma is expanding with encouraging early results emerging for triple refractory patients from various clinical trials.^3-5 Idecabtagene vicleucel is the first CAR-T product approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for multiple myeloma patients who received at least 4 different prior lines of therapy.⁶ Ciltacabtagene autoleucel was shown to result in 97% overall response rate and 67% stringent complete response in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in clinical trials and is currently approved by the FDA.⁴ Similarly, early exciting results indicate the teclistamab, a bispecific antibody, is a promising treatment option with 58% of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients achieving a very good partial response or better.⁵

The treatment of multiple myeloma has evolved significantly over the past few decades with the development of novel therapeutics. The introduction of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and high-dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has led to improved response rates and survival outcomes. The use of bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is currently under study, and early results are showing promise. Although outcomes for patients with MM have improved with the development of new treatments, there remains a subset of patients with high-risk disease who have a particularly poor prognosis. Therefore, it is critical that future clinical trials focus on developing new therapies specifically for high-risk multiple myeloma. Here we review the literature and provide guidance on treating patients with multiple myeloma for practicing oncologists.

Anti-multiple myeloma B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies represent a promising treatment strategy with high response rates in myeloma. However, durable cures following anti-BCMA CAR-T cell treatment of myeloma are rare. One potential reason is that a small subset of minimal residual myeloma cells seeds relapse. Residual myeloma cells following BCMA-CAR-T-mediated treatment show less-differentiated features and express stem-like genes, including CD24. CD24-positive myeloma cells represent a large fraction of residual myeloma cells after BCMA-CAR-T therapy. In this work, we develop CD24-CAR-T cells and test their ability to eliminate myeloma cells. We find that CD24-CAR-T cells block the CD24-Siglec-10 pathway, thereby enhancing macrophage phagocytic clearance of myeloma cells. Additionally, CD24-CAR-T cells polarize macrophages to a M1-like phenotype. A dual-targeted BCMA-CD24-CAR-T exhibits improved efficacy compared to monospecific BCMA-CAR-T-cell therapy. This work presents an immunotherapeutic approach that targets myeloma cells and promotes tumor cell clearance by macrophages.